Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Fool me once, shame on me—fool me twice, blame the ACC

The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is thought to detect unfavorable outcomes and thus influence behavior. A new paper reports that ACC-lesioned monkeys respond normally to reduced rewards, but do not maintain their improved behavioral strategy. The ACC thus is not a simple error detector, but an integrator of past reward experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Monkeys with lesions in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) correct errors but fail to maintain the new rewarded behavior.

Ann Thomson

References

  1. Terborgh, J. Five New-World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology (Monographs in Behavior and Ecology) (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Stephens, D.W. & Krebs, J.R. Foraging Theory (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schultz, W. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 87–115 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charnov, E.L. Theor. Popul. Biol. 9, 129–136 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennerley, S.W., Walton, M.E., Behrens, T.E.J., Buckley M.J. & Rushworth, M.F.S. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 940–947 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Paus, T. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 417–424 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter, C.S. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1944–1948 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gehring, W.J., Goss, B., Coles, M.G.H., Meyer, D.E. & Donchin, E. Psychol. Sci. 4, 385–390 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Botvinick, M.M., Braver, T.S., Barch, D.M., Carter, C.S. & Cohen, J.D. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624–652 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rescorla, R.A. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 329–352 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura, K., Roesch, M.R. & Olson, C.R. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 884–908 (2005).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shima, K. & Tanji, J. Science 282, 1335–1338 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrnstein, R.J. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 4, 267–272 (1961).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sugrue, L.P., Corrado, G.S. & Newsome, W.T. Science 304, 1782–1787 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aston-Jones, G. & Cohen, J.D. J. Comp. Neurol. 493, 99–110 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayden, B., Platt, M. Fool me once, shame on me—fool me twice, blame the ACC. Nat Neurosci 9, 857–859 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0706-857

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0706-857

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing