Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Neuroscience Gateway
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Article
Nature Neuroscience 9, 743 - 751 (2006)
Published online: 7 May 2006; | doi:10.1038/nn1694

The timing of cortical neurogenesis is encoded within lineages of individual progenitor cells

Qin Shen1, Yue Wang1, John T Dimos2, Christopher A Fasano1, Timothy N Phoenix1, Ihor R Lemischka2, Natalia B Ivanova2, Stefano Stifani3, Edward E Morrisey4 & Sally Temple1

1  Center for Neuropharmacology and Neuroscience, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York 12208, USA.

2  Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.

3  Center for Neuronal Survival, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada.

4  Department of Medicine and Molecular Cardiology Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

Correspondence should be addressed to Qin Shen shenq@mail.amc.edu

In the developing cerebral cortex, neurons are born on a predictable schedule. Here we show in mice that the essential timing mechanism is programmed within individual progenitor cells, and its expression depends solely on cell-intrinsic and environmental factors generated within the clonal lineage. Multipotent progenitor cells undergo repeated asymmetric divisions, sequentially generating neurons in their normal in vivo order: first preplate cells, including Cajal-Retzius neurons, then deep and finally superficial cortical plate neurons. As each cortical layer arises, stem cells and neuroblasts become restricted from generating earlier-born neuron types. Growth as neurospheres or in co-culture with younger cells did not restore their plasticity. Using short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) to reduce Foxg1 expression reset the timing of mid- but not late-gestation progenitors, allowing them to remake preplate neurons and then cortical-plate neurons. Our data demonstrate that neural stem cells change neuropotency during development and have a window of plasticity when restrictions can be reversed.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Chalk one up for 'nature' during neocortical neurogenesis

Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Jun 2006)

Trailblazers of the cortex

Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Jul 2006)

See all 4 matches for News And Views
 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
CrossRef lists 23 articles citing this articleCrossRef lists 23 articles citing this article
Save this linkSave this link
Figures & Tables
Supplementary info
See also: News and Views by Mizutani & Gaiano
Export citation

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
Nature Neuroscience
ISSN: 1097-6256
EISSN: 1546-1726
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy