Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Brain activity before an event predicts later recollection

Abstract

Neural activity elicited by an event can predict whether the event is successfully encoded into memory. Here we assessed whether memory encoding relies not only on neural activity that follows an event, but also on activity that precedes it. In two experiments we found that human brain activity elicited by a cue presented just before a word could predict whether the word would be recollected in a later memory test.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Prestimulus activity predictive of encoding success.
Figure 2: Word-elicited activity predictive of encoding success.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanquist, T.F., Rohrbaugh, J.W., Syndulko, K. & Lindsley, D.B. Psychophysiology 17, 568–576 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rugg, M.D. in Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition (eds. Rugg, M.D. & Coles, M.G.H.) 132–170 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paller, K.A. & Wagner, A.D. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 93–102 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Otten, L.J., Henson, R.N.A. & Rugg, M.D. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 1339–1344 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Uhl, F. et al. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2, 373–382 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner, A.D. et al. Science 281, 1188–1191 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rugg, M.D., Otten, L.J. & Henson, R.N.A. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357, 1097–1110 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Driver, J. & Frith, C. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 147–148 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Boxtel, G.J.M. & Bocker, K.B.E. J. Psychophysiol. 18, 61–76 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Düzel, E. et al. Neuroimage 25, 690–700 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mangun, G.R. & Hillyard, S.A. in Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition (eds. Rugg, M.D., & Coles, M.G.H.) 40–85 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pashler, H., Johnston, J.C. & Ruthruff, E. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 629–651 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Otten, L.J., Henson, R.N.A. & Rugg, M.D. Brain 124, 399–412 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruchkin, D.S., Grafman, J., Cameron, K. & Berndt, R.S. Behav. Brain Sci. 26, 709–777 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meeter, M., Murre, J.M.J. & Talamini, L.M. Hippocampus 14, 722–741 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust and the National Institute of Mental Health (1R01MH074528).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leun J Otten.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Pre-stimulus subsequent memory effect in Experiment 1 at all measured electrode sites. (PDF 125 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Pre-stimulus subsequent memory effect in Experiment 2 at all measured electrode sites. (PDF 84 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Cue-locked ERP waveforms for the experimental condition unique to Experiment 1. (PDF 126 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

Cue-locked ERP waveforms for the experimental condition unique to Experiment 2. (PDF 85 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 5

Attention-related cueing effect in Experiment 2. (PDF 550 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Recognition memory performance in Experiment 1. (PDF 48 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Recognition memory performance in Experiment 2. (PDF 48 kb)

Supplementary Data (PDF 27 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 98 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otten, L., Quayle, A., Akram, S. et al. Brain activity before an event predicts later recollection. Nat Neurosci 9, 489–491 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1663

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1663

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing