Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Neuroscience Gateway
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Article
Nature Neuroscience - 9, 1412 - 1420 (2006)
Published online: 22 October 2006; Corrected online: 08 November 2006 | doi:10.1038/nn1792

Optimal decoding of correlated neural population responses in the primate visual cortex

Yuzhi Chen, Wilson S Geisler & Eyal Seidemann

Department of Psychology and Center for Perceptual Systems, 1 University Station, A8000, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

Correspondence should be addressed to Eyal Seidemann eyal@mail.cps.utexas.edu

Even the simplest environmental stimuli elicit responses in large populations of neurons in early sensory cortical areas. How these distributed responses are read out by subsequent processing stages to mediate behavior remains unknown. Here we used voltage-sensitive dye imaging to measure directly population responses in the primary visual cortex (V1) of monkeys performing a demanding visual detection task. We then evaluated the ability of different decoding rules to detect the target from the measured neural responses. We found that small visual targets elicit widespread responses in V1, and that response variability at distant sites is highly correlated. These correlations render most previously proposed decoding rules inefficient relative to one that uses spatially antagonistic center-surround summation. This optimal decoder consistently outperformed the monkey in the detection task, demonstrating the sensitivity of our techniques. Overall, our results suggest an unexpected role for inhibitory mechanisms in efficient decoding of neural population responses.
NOTE: In the supplementary information initially published online to accompany this article,the " ¢ " symbols in Supplementary Figure 6 and Supplementary Methods were incorrectly placed in the equations. The correct symbol should be " ' ". The error has been corrected online.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Noisy neurons can certainly compute

Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Nov 2006)

More light on brains

Nature News and Views (14 Jan 1988)

See all 3 matches for News And Views
 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
CrossRef lists 5 articles citing this articleCrossRef lists 5 articles citing this article
Save this linkSave this link
Figures & Tables
Supplementary info
Export citation

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
Nature Neuroscience
ISSN: 1097-6256
EISSN: 1546-1726
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy