Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Neuroscience Gateway
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Article
Nature Neuroscience - 9, 1404 - 1411 (2006)
Published online: 8 October 2006; | doi:10.1038/nn1783

Force field effects on cerebellar Purkinje cell discharge with implications for internal models

S Pasalar1, 2, A V Roitman1, W K Durfee2 & T J Ebner1

1  Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

2  Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

Correspondence should be addressed to T J Ebner ebner001@umn.edu

The cerebellum has been hypothesized to provide internal models for limb movement control. If the cerebellum is the site of an inverse dynamics model, then cerebellar neural activity should signal limb dynamics and be coupled to arm muscle activity. To address this, we recorded from 166 task-related Purkinje cells in two monkeys performing circular manual tracking under varying viscous and elastic loads. Hand forces and arm muscle activity increased with the load, and their spatial tuning differed markedly between the viscous and elastic fields. In contrast, the simple spike firing of 91.0% of the Purkinje cells was not significantly modulated by the force nor was their spatial tuning affected. For the 15 cells with a significant force effect, changes were small and isolated. These results do not support the hypothesis that Purkinje cells represent the output of an inverse dynamics model of the arm. Instead these neurons provide a kinematic representation of arm movements.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
CrossRef lists 8 articles citing this articleCrossRef lists 8 articles citing this article
Save this linkSave this link
Figures & Tables
Export citation

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
Nature Neuroscience
ISSN: 1097-6256
EISSN: 1546-1726
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy