Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Ethics and social policy in research on the neuroscience of human sexuality

The potential benefits of neuroscientific research into sexuality are great, but neuroscientists must participate in debates over the social, forensic and therapeutic implications of their findings. If serious research in sexuality is to be supported by the public, researchers must continue to earn society's trust with responsible and thoughtful presentation of their work.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Feldman, R.P. & Goodrich, J.T. Neurosurgery 48, 647–657 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolpe, P.R. Brain Cogn. 50, 387–395 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farah, M.J. & Wolpe, P.R. Hastings Cent. Rep. 34, 35–45 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Farah, M.J. et al. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 421–425 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cacioppo J.T. et al. Introduction to the special section on social neuroscience: promise and caveats. in Social Neuroscience Series (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Harmon-Jones, E. & Devine, P.G. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85, 589–593 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Katz, J.N. The Invention of Heterosexuality (Dutton, New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lancaster, R.N. Ethnology 27, 111–125 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hines, M. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1007, 272–282 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Byne, W. & Lasco, M. The origins of sexual orientation: possible biological contributions. in Same Sex: Debating the Ethics, Science, and Culture of Homosexuality (ed. Corvino, J.) 107–120 (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bing, J. Women Lang. 22, 4–12 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tracy, J. et al. Cereb. Cortex 13, 904–910 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Richards, T.L. Learn. Disabil. Q. 24, 189–203 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown, D.W. Med. Hypotheses 45, 383–385 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Raichle, M. Political Psychol. 24, 759–764 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolpe, P. Ethics and social policy in research on the neuroscience of human sexuality. Nat Neurosci 7, 1031–1033 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1324

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1324

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing