Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Neuroscience Gateway
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Review
Music and the Brain
 Contents  Introduction    Reviews     Feedback 


Nature Neuroscience  6, 663 - 668 (2003)
Published online: 25 June 2003; | doi:10.1038/nn1080

The evolution of the music faculty: a comparative perspective

Marc D Hauser1, 2 & Josh McDermott2, 3

1  Department of Psychology and Program in Neurosciences, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.

2  Primate Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.

3  Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.

Correspondence should be addressed to Marc D Hauser mdhauser@wjh.harvard.edu or Josh McDermott jhm@mit.edu
We propose a theoretical framework for exploring the evolution of the music faculty from a comparative perspective. This framework addresses questions of phylogeny, adaptive function, innate biases and perceptual mechanisms. We argue that comparative studies can make two unique contributions to investigations of the origins of music. First, musical exposure can be controlled and manipulated to an extent not possible in humans. Second, any features of music perception found in nonhuman animals must not be part of an adaptation for music, and must rather be side effects of more general features of perception or cognition. We review studies that use animal research to target specific aspects of music perception (such as octave generalization), as well as studies that investigate more general and shared systems of the mind/brain that may be relevant to music (such as rhythm perception and emotional encoding). Finally, we suggest several directions for future work, following the lead of comparative studies on the language faculty.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

REFERENCE
Williams Syndrome
Nature Encyclopaedia of Life Sciences

REVIEWS
The developmental origins of musicality
Nature Neuroscience Review (01 Jul 2003)
 See all 7 matches for Reviews

NEWS AND VIEWS
Neuropsychology: Brains out of tune
Nature News and Views (07 Feb 2002)
How do our brains analyze temporal structure in sound?
Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Sep 1998)
 See all 4 matches for News And Views

RESEARCH
Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity in paralimbic brain regions
Nature Neuroscience Article (01 Apr 1999)
 See all 10 matches for Research

 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

naturejobs

Figures & Tables
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Neuroscience
ISSN: 1097-6256
EISSN: 1546-1726
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2003 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy