Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Speed of visual processing increases with eccentricity

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 01 August 2003

Abstract

The visual system has a duplex design to meet conflicting environmental demands: the fovea has the resolution required to process fine spatial information, but the periphery is more sensitive to temporal properties1,2,3. To investigate whether the periphery's sensitivity is partly due to the speed with which information is processed, we measured the full timecourse of visual information processing by deriving joint measures of discriminability and speed, and found that speed of information processing varies with eccentricity: processing was faster when same-size stimuli appeared at 9° than 4° eccentricity, and this difference was attenuated when the 9° stimuli were magnified to equate cortical representation size. At the same eccentricity, larger stimuli are processed more slowly. These temporal differences are greater than expected from neurophysiological constraints4,5,6.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: SAT methodology and hypothetical functions.
Figure 2: SAT results and speed of visual processing.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeValois, R.L. & DeValois, K.K. Spatial Vision (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hartmann, E., Lachenmayr, B. & Brettel, H. Vision Res. 19, 1019–1023 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McKee, S.P. & Nakayama, K. Vision Res. 24, 25–32 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lennie, P. Perception 27, 889–935 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmolesky, M.T. et al. Neurophysiology 79, 3272–3278 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamme, V.A. & Roelfsema, P.R. Trends Neurosci. 23, 571–579 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Azzopardi, P., Jones, K.E. & Cowey, A. Vision Res. 39, 2179–2189 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Breitmeyer, B.G. Visual Masking (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reed, A. Science, 181, 574–576 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McElree, B. & Carrasco, M. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25, 1517–1539 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carrasco, M. & McElree, B. PNAS 98, 5363–5367 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Virsu, V., Rovamo, J., Laurinen, P. & Nasanen, R. Vision Res. 22, 1211–1217 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bringuier, V., Chavane, F., Glaeser, L. & Fregnac, Y. Science 283, 695–699 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Girard, P., Hupé, J.M. & Bullier, J. J. Neurophysiol. 85, 1328–1331 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rousselet, G.A., Fabre-Thorpe, M. & Thorpe, S.J. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 629–630 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.M. Hupé, M. Landy, P. Lennie, L. Maloney, D. Pelli and R. Shapley for discussions. A National Science Foundation (BCS–9910734/HCP] grant to M.C. and a National Institute of Mental Health (MH57458) grant to B.M. supported this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marisa Carrasco.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carrasco, M., McElree, B., Denisova, K. et al. Speed of visual processing increases with eccentricity. Nat Neurosci 6, 699–700 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1079

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1079

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing