Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Neuroscience Gateway
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Article
Nature Neuroscience  5, 1345 - 1352 (2002)
Published online: 4 November 2002; | doi:10.1038/nn969

Human fMRI evidence for the neural correlates of preparatory set

Jason D. Connolly1, Melvyn A. Goodale1, Ravi S. Menon2 & Douglas P. Munoz3

1  CIHR Group on Action and Perception, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6C 5C2, Canada

2  Robarts Research Institute, Box 5015, 100 Perth Drive, London, Ontario N6A 5K8, Canada

3  Center for Neuroscience Studies, Department of Physiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada

Correspondence should be addressed to Melvyn A. Goodale mgoodale@uwo.ca
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study readiness and intention signals in frontal and parietal areas that have been implicated in planning saccadic eye movements—the frontal eye fields (FEF) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS). To track fMRI signal changes correlated with readiness to act, we used an event-related design with variable gap periods between disappearance of the fixation point and appearance of the target. To track changes associated with intention, subjects were instructed before the gap period to make either a pro-saccade (look at target) or an anti-saccade (look away from target). FEF activation increased during the gap period and was higher for anti- than for pro-saccade trials. No signal increases were observed during the gap period in the IPS. Our findings suggest that within the frontoparietal networks that control saccade generation, the human FEF, but not the IPS, is critically involved in preparatory set, coding both the readiness and intention to perform a particular movement.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

REFERENCE
Brain Imaging: Observing Ongoing Neural Activity
Nature Encyclopaedia of Life Sciences

REVIEWS
Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement
Nature Reviews Neuroscience Review (01 Mar 2004)
 See all 8 matches for Reviews

NEWS AND VIEWS
The cortical basis of motor planning: does it take two to tango?
Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Dec 2002)
Attention -- brains at work!
Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Mar 2000)
 See all 6 matches for News And Views

RESEARCH
Antisaccade performance predicted by neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field
Nature Letters to Editor (27 Nov 1997)
 See all 32 matches for Research

 Top
Abstract
Previous
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

Figures & Tables
See also: News and Views by Marois
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Neuroscience
ISSN: 1097-6256
EISSN: 1546-1726
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2002 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy