Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Neuroscience Gateway
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Article
Nature Neuroscience  3, 927 - 931 (2000)
doi:10.1038/78840

Multi-unit recordings reveal context-dependent modulation of synchrony in odor-specific neural ensembles

Thomas A. Christensen, Vincent M. Pawlowski, Hong Lei & John G. Hildebrand

Arizona Research Laboratories, Division of Neurobiology, University of Arizona, PO Box 210077, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0077, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Thomas A. Christensen tc@neurobio.arizona.edu
We used neural ensemble recording to examine odor-evoked ensemble patterns in the moth antennal (olfactory) lobe. Different odors are thought to evoke unique spatiotemporal patterns of glomerular activity, but little is known about the population dynamics underlying formation of these patterns. Using a silicon multielectrode array, we observed dynamic network interactions within and between glomeruli. Whereas brief odor pulses repeatedly triggered activity in the same coding ensemble, the temporal pattern of synchronous activity superimposed on the ensemble was neither oscillatory nor odor specific. Rather, synchrony strongly depended on contextual variables such as odor intensity and intermittency. Also, because of emergent inhibitory circuit interactions, odor blends evoked temporal ensemble patterns that could not be predicted from the responses to the individual odorants. Thus even at this early stage of information processing, the timing of odor-evoked neural representations is modulated by key stimulus factors unrelated to the molecular identity of the odor.

 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

Open Innovation Challenges

Figures & Tables
See also: News and Views by Galizia & Menzel
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Neuroscience
ISSN: 1097-6256
EISSN: 1546-1726
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2000 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy