Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Neuroscience Gateway
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
News and Views
Nature Neuroscience  3, 1236 (2000)
doi:10.1038/81753

Keep your eye off the ball

Jack Horne
The frequently heard coach's advice, "Keep your eye on the ball", may not be the best approach, suggests a new study on page 1236 of this issue*. The authors used the cricket batsman's challenge (how to react to a fast-approaching ball) to address how athletes use visual cues to produce rapid and accurate motor responses. Previous theories proposed that a batsman must use direct visual measurements, such as image expansion or the rate of change of binocular disparity, to predict the ball's trajectory. However, given that the batsman has only a fraction of a second to monitor such visual cues, it has been controversial whether these parameters could be measured accurately enough to guide the correct response.

Land and McLeod took a new approach to this problem by monitoring the eye movements of batsmen as the ball was approaching, to determine what type of visual information they were actually collecting. The authors monitored the eye movements of three cricket batsman of widely varying skill, and found that, in general, they made a similar sequence of eye movements. Their eyes followed the ball's trajectory for a short period after release, then made a saccade below the ball to the site where it would be predicted to bounce. They then fixated again on the ball as it bounced, and followed its upward trajectory for approximately 200 ms afterward. The parameters that best distinguished most skilled from least skilled batsmen were the speed and variability of the initial saccade. The best batsman had the shortest delay between the ball's release and saccade initiation, and also used different saccade timing and magnitude for different ball trajectories. Therefore, the cricket batsman prepares his response to an oncoming ball by quickly assessing its predicted trajectory and directing visual attention to appropriate regions of the visual field with a precisely timed sequence of eye movements.

Due to an error, the incorrect related page number was printed. Please click here to go to the correct related page 1340.

 Top
FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

See also: Article by Land & McLeod
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Neuroscience
ISSN: 1097-6256
EISSN: 1546-1726
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2000 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy