Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

You won't regret reading this

The orbitofrontal cortex and ventral striatum encode expected outcomes during economic decision-making. Research now demonstrates that activity in these structures also represents missed opportunities during a foraging task cleverly designed to elicit regret in rats, the Restaurant Row task.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Neural encoding of regret in OFC and ventral striatum in rats performing the Restaurant Row task.

References

  1. Steiner, A.P. & Redish, A.D. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 995–1002 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wallis, J.D. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 31–56 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Padoa-Schioppa, C. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 34, 333–359 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Takahashi, Y.K. et al. Neuron 80, 507–518 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barron, H.C., Dolan, R.J. & Behrens, T.E. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1492–1498 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abe, H. & Lee, D. Neuron 70, 731–741 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coricelli, G., Dolan, R.J. & Sirigu, A. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 258–265 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Takahashi, Y.K. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1590–1597 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schultz, W., Dayan, P. & Montague, P.R. Science 275, 1593–1599 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Roesch, M.R., Calu, D.J. & Schoenbaum, G. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1615–1624 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bromberg-Martin, E.S., Matsumoto, M. & Hikosaka, O. Neuron 68, 815–834 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Camille, N. et al. Science 304, 1167–1170 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Larquet, M., Coricelli, G., Opolczynski, G. & Thibaut, F. Schizophr. Res. 116, 266–273 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roese, N.J., Park, S., Gibson, C. & Smallman, R. Schizophr. Res. 103, 343–344 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hooker, C., Roese, N.J. & Park, S. Psychiatry 63, 326–335 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew R Roesch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bissonette, G., Bryden, D. & Roesch, M. You won't regret reading this. Nat Neurosci 17, 892–893 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3745

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3745

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing