Abstract
A recent decision in the United States by the New Jersey Supreme Court has led to improved jury instructions that incorporate psychological research showing that memory does not operate like a video recording. Here we consider how cognitive neuroscience could contribute to addressing memory in the courtroom. We discuss conditions in which neuroimaging can distinguish true and false memories in the laboratory and note reasons to be skeptical about its use in courtroom cases. We also discuss neuroscience research concerning false and imagined memories, misinformation effects and reconsolidation phenomena that may enhance understanding of why memory does not operate like a video recording.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
EEG Lie Detection Evidence and Potential Australian Jurors
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Open Access 17 April 2024
-
Epistemic agency and the generalisation of fear
Synthese Open Access 17 June 2023
-
Cross-stage neural pattern similarity in the hippocampus predicts false memory derived from post-event inaccurate information
Nature Communications Open Access 21 April 2023
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
State v. Henderson, 208 N.J. 208 (2011).
Anonymous. Identification: in-court and out-of-court identifications. Criminal Jury Charges <http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/criminal/charges/idinout.pdf> (2012; accessed 15 September 2012).
Schmechel, R.S., O'Toole, T.P., Easterly, C. & Loftus, E.F. Jurimetr. J. 46, 177–214 (2006).
Simon, D.J. & Chabris, C.F. PLoS ONE 6, e22757 (2011).
Brainerd, C.J. & Reyna, V.F. The Science of False Memory (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2005).
Gallo, D.A. Associative Illusions of Memory (Taylor & Francis, New York, 2006).
Loftus, E.F. Am. Psychol. 58, 867–873 (2003).
Schacter, D.L. The Sevens Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers (Houghton Mifflin, New York and Boston, 2001).
Schacter, D.L., Guerin, S.A. & St. Jacques, P.L. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 467–474 (2011).
Brewer, A. & Wells, G.L. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 24–27 (2011).
Loftus, E.F. Learn. Mem. 12, 361–366 (2005).
Frenda, S.J., Nichols, R.M. & Loftus, E.F. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 20–23 (2011).
Meissner, C.A. & Brigham, J.C. Psychol. Public Policy Law 7, 3–35 (2001).
Deffenbacher, K.A., Borstein, B.H., Penrod, S.D. & McGorty, E.K. Law Hum. Behav. 28, 687–706 (2004).
Garrett, B.L. Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 2011).
Dudai, Y. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 227–247 (2012).
Hardt, O., Einarsson, E.O. & Nader, K. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 61, 141–167 (2010).
Schacter, D.L., Norman, K.A. & Koutstaal, W. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49, 289–318 (1998).
Squire, L.R. in Memory Distortion: How Minds, Brains, and Societies Reconstruct the Past (eds. Schacter, D.L., Coyle, J.T., Fischbach, G.D., Mesulam, M.-M. & Sullivan, L.E.) 197–225 (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1995).
Bernstein, D.M. & Loftus, E.F. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4, 370–374 (2009).
Schacter, D.L. & Slotnick, S.D. Neuron 44, 149–160 (2004).
Schacter, D.L., Chamberlain, J., Gaesser, B. & Gerlach, K. in Memory and Law (eds. Nadel, L. & Sinnott-Armstrong, W.P.) 233–262 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2012).
Straube, B. Behav. Brain Functions 8, 35 (2012).
Abe, N. et al. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2811–2819 (2008).
Guerin, S.A., Robbins, C.A., Gilmore, A.W. & Schacter, D.L. Neuron 75, 1122–1134 (2012).
Schacter, D.L. et al. Neuron 17, 267–274 (1996).
Slotnick, S.D. & Schacter, D.L. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 664–672 (2004).
Gonsalves, B. et al. Psychol. Sci. 15, 655–660 (2004).
Kensinger, E.A. & Schacter, D.L. Cereb. Cortex 16, 1126–1133 (2006).
Baym, C.L. & Gonsalves, B.D. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 10, 339–348 (2010).
Okado, Y. & Stark, C.E. Learn. Mem. 12, 3–11 (2005).
Stark, C.E., Okado, Y. & Loftus, E.F. Learn. Mem. 17, 485–488 (2010).
Schooler, J.W., Gerhard, D. & Loftus, E.F. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 12, 171–181 (1986).
Gutchess, A.H. & Schacter, D.L. Neuroimage 59, 3418–3426 (2012).
Garoff-Eaton, R.J., Kensinger, E.A. & Schacter, D.L. Learn. Mem. 14, 684–692 (2007).
McDermott, K.B., Szpunar, K.K. & Christ, S.E. Neuropsychologia 47, 2290–2298 (2009).
Rissman, J., Greely, H.T. & Wagner, A.D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9849–9854 (2010).
Chua, E.F. in Memory and Law (eds. Nadel, L. & Sinnott-Armstrong, W.P.) 119–141 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2012).
Greely, H.T. & Illes, J. Am. J. Law Med. 33, 377–431 (2007).
Rosenfeld, J.P., Ben-Shakhar, G. & Ganis, G. in Memory and Law (eds. Nadel, L. & Sinnott-Armstrong, W.P.) 263–303 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2012).
Abe, N. Neuroscientist 17, 560–574 (2011).
Ganis, G., Rosenfeld, J.P., Meixner, J., Kievit, R.A. & Schendan, H.E. Neuroimage 55, 312–319 (2011).
Garoff-Eaton, R.J., Slotnick, S.D. & Schacter, D.L. Cereb. Cortex 16, 1645–1652 (2006).
Garry, M., Manning, C., Loftus, E.F. & Sherman, S.J. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 3, 208–214 (1996).
Goff, L.M. & Roediger, H.L. III. Mem. Cognit. 26, 20–33 (1998).
Schacter, D.L. et al. Neuron 76, 677–694 (2012).
Edelson, M., Sharot, T., Dolan, R.J. & Dudai, Y. Science 333, 108–111 (2011).
Lee, J.L. Trends Neurosci. 32, 413–420 (2009).
Agren, T. et al. Science 337, 1550–1552 (2012).
Hupbach, A., Hardt, O., Gomez, R. & Nadel, L. Learn. Mem. 15, 574–579 (2008).
Schiller, D. et al. Nature 463, 49–53 (2010).
St. Jacques, P.L. & Schacter, D.L. Psychol. Sci. (in the press).
Gazzaniga, M.S. Sci. Am. 304, 54–59 (2011).
State v. Nelson, 11th Fl. Cir. Ct., F05–846 (2010).
Brown, T. & Murphy, E. Stanford Law Rev. 62, 1119–1208 (2010).
McCabe, D.P. & Castel, A.D. Cognition 107, 343–352 (2008).
McCabe, D.P., Castel, A.D. & Rhodes, M.G. Behav. Sci. Law 29, 566–577 (2011).
Schweitzer, N.J. et al. Psychol. Public Policy Law 17, 357–393 (2011).
Laris, M. Debate on brain scans as lie detectors highlighted in Maryland murder trial. Washington Post (26 August 2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schacter, D., Loftus, E. Memory and law: what can cognitive neuroscience contribute?. Nat Neurosci 16, 119–123 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3294
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3294
This article is cited by
-
EEG Lie Detection Evidence and Potential Australian Jurors
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology (2024)
-
Cross-stage neural pattern similarity in the hippocampus predicts false memory derived from post-event inaccurate information
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Epistemic agency and the generalisation of fear
Synthese (2023)
-
Die aussagepsychologische Begutachtung: eine verengte Perspektive?
Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie (2019)
-
Conducting Successful Memory Interviews with Children
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (2018)