Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

The highs and lows of being tone deaf

Representations of pitch and space seem to interact. A new study now reports that people with amusia, a pitch processing deficit, do not show the interference between these concepts that is found in control subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The link between musical and spatial processing was investigated via a set of tasks.

Ann Thompson

References

  1. Repp, B.H. & Knoblich, G. Psychol. Sci. 18, 6–7 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B.L., Umilta, C. & Butterworth, B. Cognition 99, 113–129 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayotte, J., Peretz, I. & Hyde, K. Brain 125, 238–251 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peretz, I. et al. Neuron 33, 185–191 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Douglas, K.M. & Bilkey, D.K. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 915–921 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peretz, I., Champod, A.S. & Hyde, K. Neurosciences and Music Vol. 999 (eds. Avanzini, G. et al.) 58–75 (New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shepard, R.N. & Metzler, J. Science 171, 701–703 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart, L., von Kriegstein, K., Warren, J.D. & Griffiths, T.D. Brain 129, 2533–2553 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hubbard, E.M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P. & Dehaene, S. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 435–448 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Walsh, V. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 483–488 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyde, K.L., Zatorre, R.J., Griffiths, T.D., Lerch, J.P. & Peretz, I. Brain 129, 2562–2570 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaab, N., Gaser, C., Zaehle, T., Jancke, L. & Schlaug, G. Neuroimage 19, 1417–1426 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Janata, P., Tillmann, B. & Bharucha, J.J. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2, 121–140 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zatorre, R.J., Evans, A.C. & Meyer, E. J. Neurosci. 14, 1908–1919 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janata, P. The highs and lows of being tone deaf. Nat Neurosci 10, 810–812 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0707-810

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0707-810

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing