Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Mechanisms of scent-tracking in humans

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 01 February 2007

This article has been updated

Abstract

Whether mammalian scent-tracking is aided by inter-nostril comparisons is unknown. We assessed this in humans and found that (i) humans can scent-track, (ii) they improve with practice, (iii) the human nostrils sample spatially distinct regions separated by 3.5 cm and, critically, (iv) scent-tracking is aided by inter-nostril comparisons. These findings reveal fundamental mechanisms of scent-tracking and suggest that the poor reputation of human olfaction may reflect, in part, behavioral demands rather than ultimate abilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Human subject's path following a scent trail, as compared to a dog's path.
Figure 2: Training increased tracking velocity, decreased deviation from track, and increased sniffing frequency.
Figure 3: The two-nostril advantage in sampling and tracking.

Change history

  • 04 January 2007

    corrected last name

References

  1. Vickers, N.J. Chem. Senses 31, 155–166 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koehl, M.A. et al. Science 294, 1948–1951 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thesen, A., Steen, J.B. & Doving, K.B. J. Exp. Biol. 180, 247–251 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Settles, G.S. J. Fluids Eng. 127, 189–218 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mainland, J. & Sobel, N. Chem. Senses 31, 181–196 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moulton, D.G. Am. Zool. 7, 421–428 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Crimaldi, J.P. & Koseff, J.R. Exp. Fluids 31, 90–102 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson, D.A. & Sullivan, R.M. Physiol. Behav. 66, 41–44 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilad, Y., Wiebel, V., Przeworski, M., Lancet, D. & Paabo, S. PLoS Biol. 2, 120–125 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Laska, M., Seibt, A. & Weber, A. Chem. Senses 25, 47–53 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shepherd, G.M. PLoS Biol. 2, 572–575 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, T.D. & Bhatnagar, K.P. Anat. Rec. B New Anat. 279, 24–31 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajan, R., Clement, J.P. & Bhalla, U.S. Science 311, 666–670 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Porter, J., Anand, T., Johnson, B., Khan, R.M. & Sobel, N. Neuron 47, 581–592 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibbons, B. Nat. Geogr. Mag. 170, 324–361 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Studies were funded by Army Research Office grant #46666-LS and by US National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders grants DC006915 and DC005958. The authors wish to thank B. Willmore for help with the video tracking algorithm and K. Scott for comments on the manuscript, as well as Arak Elite.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jess Porter or Noam Sobel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

An example dynamic power spectra and tracking path. (PDF 370 kb)

Supplementary Video 1

Sample trial. (MOV 2171 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 90 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Porter, J., Craven, B., Khan, R. et al. Mechanisms of scent-tracking in humans. Nat Neurosci 10, 27–29 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1819

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1819

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing