Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Neuroscience Gateway
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Article
Nature Neuroscience  1, 324 - 328 (1998)
doi:10.1038/1142

Genetic influence on language delay in two-year-old children

Philip Dale1, Emily Simonoff2, Dorothy Bishop3, Thalia Eley2, Bonny Oliver2, Thomas Price2, Shaun Purcell2, Jim Stevenson4 & Robert Plomin2

1  Department of Psychology, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington 98195, USA

2  Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF, UK

3  MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (formerly Applied Psychology Unit), Cambridge, CB2 2EF, UK

4  Centre for Research into Psychological Development, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

Correspondence should be addressed to Robert Plomin r.plomin@iop.bpmf.ac.uk
Previous work suggests that most clinically significant language difficulties in children do not result from acquired brain lesions or adverse environmental experiences but from genetic factors that presumably influence early brain development. We conducted the first twin study of language delay to evaluate whether genetic and environmental factors at the lower extreme of delayed language are different from those operating in the normal range. Vocabulary at age two was assessed for more than 3000 pairs of twins. Group differences heritability for the lowest 5% of subjects was estimated as 73% in model-fitting analyses, significantly greater than the individual differences heritability for the entire sample (25%). This supports the view of early language delay as a distinct disorder. Shared environment was only a quarter as important for the language-delayed sample (18%) as for the entire sample (69%).

 Top
Abstract
Previous
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

naturejobs

Figures & Tables
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Neuroscience
ISSN: 1097-6256
EISSN: 1546-1726
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©1998 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy