Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Neuroscience Gateway
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
News and Views
Nature Neuroscience  1, 10 - 12 (1998)
doi:10.1038/208

Neurolab Launches the Decade of the Brain into Space

Sandra Aamodt

Sandra Aamodt is an assistant editor with Nature Neuroscience.

April will see the launch of Neurolab, a set of experiments aboard the space shuttle that will investigate the effects of zero gravity on the nervous system.

The space shuttle Columbia, scheduled to launch Neurolab into orbit on 16 April. The mission will last 16 days, and will carry 26 projects designed investigate the effect of zero gravity on the nervous system. The crew will perform physiological and behavioural experiments on a wide range of species, from crickets to rats to human astronauts themselves.

As Nature Neuroscience goes to press, nine astronauts are scheduled to take rats, mice, fish, snails and crickets into orbit aboard the space shuttle Columbia on 16 April. The mission's goal is to increase understanding of the mechanisms responsible for neurological and behavioral changes under microgravity. The shuttle will remain in orbit for 16 days, and six 'mission specialists' (with eight advanced biology or medicine degrees among them) will carry out a total of 26 separate projects. In addition to performing the animal experiments, some of the astronauts are subjects themselves, for experiments on human physiological and behavioral adaptations to microgravity . The Neurolab mission is NASA's contribution to the Decade of the Brain, and it results from an unusual collaboration between NASA and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). The experiments were reviewed and selected by NIH, from a total of 175 applications that were submitted in response to the original announcement of the mission back in 1993. Since then, NASA, as well as NIH, NSF, the European Space Agency and other national funding bodies from France, Canada and Japan, have sponsored the several years of ground-based research that has led to the final flight selection. Some of the experiments are intended to examine human physiology in space, partly with a view to preparing the way for longer space flights in the future. Others address more basic scientific questions; the principle criteria for selection were scientific merit and feasibility. What follows is a brief account of three projects that illustrate the range of topics being studied.

Bruce McNaughton and colleagues at the University of Arizona are taking advantage of the microgravity environment to test a theory of how visual and vestibular inputs interact to calibrate cognitive maps of spatial location. In a familiar environment, a rat's location is signaled by ensemble coding in the place cells of the hippocampus. Each place cell fires most strongly at a preferred spatial location, and the population response of all place cells defines the rat's position in a two-dimensional map of the space. This spatial map is anchored to visual landmarks, as moving the set of landmarks causes the preferred locations of the place cells to change.

Although the hippocampus does not receive any direct projections from the vestibular system, behavioral experiments show that vestibular stimuli affect spatial maps. In complete darkness, rats can return to the nest by a direct path, even if they have reached their current position by a complicated series of turns. If the test area (including the nest) is rotated at a rate that exceeds the threshold for the vestibular system, the rat can still find its way back. But if the rotation is below the threshold of detection, the rat behaves as if no movement had occurred, and loses its way . These findings imply that rats use vestibular inputs to keep track of their location when visual cues are unavailable.

The source of this vestibular information may be a group of neurons called head direction or H cells, which are tuned to the orientation of the rat's head in space. The H cells are found in many regions of the brain, including the subicular complex, cingulate and parietal cortex, lateral dorsal thalamus and superior colliculus. Like place cells, H-cell tuning is controlled by vision in a familiar environment, but H cells will maintain their absolute direction sense if the transition to an unfamiliar environment is smooth. If rats are disoriented or visual landmarks are unreliable, H cells adopt random preferences. Although H cells remain tuned in darkness, their preferences tend to drift over time.

McNaughton and colleagues have postulated that H-cell preferences do not drift in the light because active head cells form associations with cells sensitive to the spatial location of visual stimuli. This process would recalibrate the H cells to familiar visual landmarks. The hypothesis predicts that after rotation of the rat's environment, landmarks and all, the visual input should control H cell tuning in a familiar environment, but the vestibular input should dominate in an unfamiliar environment. Three experiments in normal gravity confirmed this prediction.

Another way to demonstrate that stable spatial maps require associations between H cells and place cells involves recording from both types of cell in an environment with a single visual landmark, a white card on one wall. The card determines the preferred locations of place cells − unless the rat is disoriented every time it enters the environment. In that case, both H cells and place cells act as they would in the dark. Because disorientation causes H cells to adopt an arbitrary orientation, the rat presumably perceives the white card as moving from trial to trial and therefore rejects it as a visual landmark. This interpretation is strengthened by a control in which rats initially are exposed to the white card without disorientation. The initial training allows the card to gain control of the place-cell fields, which persists even in later trials with disorientation.

The Escher maze used by McNaughton and colleagues to study the effect of gravity on the brain's representation of space. Rats are trained to walk around the maze, using the dark velcro strips to enhance their grip. In this three-dimensional arrangement, three turns lead the rat back to its starting point, whereas in a flattened maze four would be needed. In zero gravity, however, the vestibular cues that would normally distinguish the two arrangements are absent; the experiment will use a multiple recording electrode to test how spatial representations in the hippocampus are affected by the conflict between vestibular and visual cues.

The microgravity environment of Neurolab offers a unique opportunity to find out what happens when both visual cues and vestibular inputs fail to match the cognitive spatial map. McNaughton's plan is to record from an array of 30-40 place cells in the hippocampus while the rat performs the "Escher maze" shown in the picture. Rats have been trained to walk along the maze while hanging onto both edges of the track, to obtain a brain stimulation reward. Previous experiments indicate that H cells should perceive only the 90° yaw turns, and not the 90° forward pitches, as changes of direction. In this three-dimensional maze, though, the rat returns to its starting position after three (rather than the usual four) turns, suggesting that H cells will lag by 90° after each full circuit. This will lead to a false input to the hippocampal place cells, such that the hippocampal spatial coordinates will not be fully updated as the animal makes its turns; instead, the map coordinate will indicate that the rat is on third base when it has in fact already returned to the home plate. This continuing lag as the rat walks around the maze should prevent the formation of consistent associations between place cells and visual landmarks. Possible outcomes of the experiment include complete suppression of place cell activity, as occurs when rats cannot move, control of place cells by visual landmarks, or dissociation of place cell firing from the rat's spatial location. Any of these results will increase our understanding of how cognitive spatial maps are constructed and maintained.

One Neurolab experiment on human subjects will test how gravity is incorporated into internal cognitive models of external object motion. This project has been coodinated by the Centre National d'etude Spatiale in France, and the primary investigators are Alain Berthoz at CNRS-College de France in Paris, Francesco Lacquaniti at Clinica Santa Lucia in Rome and Joseph McIntyre, who has a joint appointment at both institutions. Berthoz describes his experiment as a dynamic version of what the French refer to as "L'expérience du garçon de café". If a waiter who is carrying a bottle of wine on his tray lifts the bottle himself, the tray will not move upward in spite of the load release; but if a client suddenly lifts the bottle unexpectedly, the tray will rise. The brain of the garçon de café has been able to anticipate (in the case of active lifting) the consequences of the load release using his internal model of the mechanics involved. These static representations of the force of gravity are formed by about one year of age; the microgravity experiments will test whether the brain has a similar model of the acceleration due to gravity, and whether these are susceptible to experience-dependent modification in the zero-gravity environment of the space shuttle.

The task is to use an outstretched hand to catch a tennis ball dropped with varying initial velocities. The timing of ball arrival theoretically could be computed from the expansion of its signal on the retina by assuming a constant velocity for the ball. In practice, although subjects do need to see the ball for at least 330 ms to make the correct anticipatory muscle response, they also take gravity into account when computing the ball's motion path.

The hypothesis of this study is that the brain instead assumes that gravity will remain constant. In space, where the ball does not accelerate, the hypothesis predicts premature anticipatory muscle responses, measured by surface electrodes on the hand muscles and by arm movements detected by a video-computerized technique. The hypothesis is supported by the observation that one newly arrived cosmonaut on the Russian space station MIR, upon dropping his camera, immediately reached "down" to grab it, missing completely as the camera continued moving away in an unanticipated straight line.

If the constant-gravity model is supported by this experiment, the investigation will focus on whether and how the response changes over the mission duration. On the other hand, if subjects perform perfectly in microgravity from the beginning, follow-up experiments during future shuttle flights are planned to determine whether calculation of the gravitational force is based on visual, vestibular, proprioceptive information or on efferent copy from motor commands. These experiments will rely on a virtual environment, which allows visual and vestibular cues to be manipulated independently. The virtual environment generator includes a three-dimensional graphics workstation, helmet-mounted display, head tracker and joystick. The subject also wears a harness that pulls the body "downward" to simulate gravity. This apparatus gives the experimenters more complete control of the sensory input than would be possible on earth.

Aside from producing temporary adaptations in the spatial computations of adult animals, the sensory environment has profound and often permanent effects on neural development. For example, visual experience during a critical period is required to produce the normal pattern of connections from the thalamus to the visual cortex, and changes in visual input can cause permanent deficits in young animals. If neural activity is similarly important for developing vestibular areas, then the signals provided by gravity are expected to be critical for normal synapse formation in brain regions that process spatial information.

Ken Kosik at Harvard and Oswald Steward at the University of Virginia are testing this by investigating the effects of gravity on synapse development. Young rats are raised in microgravity from postnatal day 4 to 20 days of age. This period was chosen because synapse number, dendritic complexity and spine number, and expression of synaptic proteins all increase dramatically in the hippocampus during this time. Upon returning from space, the animals will be perfused for light and electron microscopy. Because of space shuttle procedures, the earliest time point is approximately 24 hours after landing, and the second is at 30 days after landing to assay for long-lasting changes. Synapse development in several brain regions will be determined with unbiased stereological sampling to determine volume and synapse density.

Three regions have been chosen for analysis. The vestibulocerebellum receives input from vestibular nuclei and sends an inhibitory projection to brainstem motor pathways thought to be important for posture and balance. The parietal cortex receives information from sensory association areas and projects to motor cortex. As discussed above, the hippocampus signals location in space and responds to vestibular information. Given that many other sensory systems show experience-dependent plasticity during development, it is possible that any or all of these regions may show alterations as a result of the exposure to microgravity.

There is of course much uncertainty as to whether any of the Neurolab experiments will work exactly as planned. They have been thoroughly screened for feasibility, with extensive pilot experiments culminating in dummy runs performed by the astronauts themselves in a mock-up of the shuttle lab. But there is plenty that could still go wrong; McNaughton notes, for instance, that although his rats are trained and the tetrodes are already implanted and working (two weeks prior to the launch date), the effects of brain edema in zero gravity may yet compromise the recordings once the rats are in space. Worse still, the rats may decide on exposure to zero gravity that the novelty of floating round the cabin outweighs the rewards of cooperation with the experimenters. But these uncertainties are inescapable; it is of course the unfamiliarity of the zero gravity environment that constitutes the justification, as well as the risk, of all the Neurolab experiments.

 Top
FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

Abstract
See also: Article by Yan & Suga
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Neuroscience
ISSN: 1097-6256
EISSN: 1546-1726
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©1998 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy