Does catheter size affect pressure–flow studies in women with lower urinary tract symptoms?
Asnat Groutz
Correspondence 26A Poaley Harakevet Street, Givataim 53255, Israel
Email agroutz@yahoo.com
This article has no abstract so we have provided the first paragraph of the full text.
The PFS is considered to be the best method to assess the voiding phase of the micturition cycle. Ideally, the flow pattern in a PFS should be representative of the equivalent noninvasive, or free-flow, uroflowmetry in a given patient. Factors associated with the pressure–flow technique and setting, however, can affect the voiding process. Specifically, the use of a transurethral catheter could potentially cause urethral irritation, relative BOO, or both, during the study. Previous studies suggested that the presence of 7 Fr or 6 Fr transurethral catheters have a profound effect on uroflow, falsely increasing the prevalence of urethral obstruction in women undergoing PFS.1, 2
Full text of this article is available with one of the following:
- Personal subscription Purchase your own personal subscription to this journal. Already a subscriber? Please log in for immediate access.
- 7 day single article pass for US$18 In order to purchase this article you must be a registered user. Please register or log in.
- Site licence Learn more about institutional site licences
Current Subscribers
Please log in to access the full text article using the login box at the top of the page.
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
A role for nitric oxide synthase in urinary ?urge syndrome?Nature Medicine News and Views (01 May 1997)

