<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.nature.com/ncponc/current_issue/rss">
<title>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</title>
<description>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology provides oncologists with authoritative and timely interpretations of key developments in the field, translating the latest findings into clinical practice.</description>
<link>http://www.nature.com/ncponc/current_issue/</link>
<dc:publisher>Nature Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:rights>&#169;  Nature Publishing Group</dc:rights>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1743-4254</prism:issn>
<prism:eIssn>1743-4262</prism:eIssn>
<prism:copyright>&#169;  Nature Publishing Group</prism:copyright>
<prism:rightsAgent>permissions@nature.com</prism:rightsAgent>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.nature.com/includes/rj_globnavimages/ncponc_logo.gif"/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1176"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1163"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1174"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1162"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0963"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0953"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0952"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0955"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0936"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1175"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0954"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1173"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1179"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1156"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1161"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1159"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1155"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1137"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1134"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1157"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://www.nature.com/includes/rj_globnavimages/ncponc_logo.gif">
<title>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</title>
<url>http://www.nature.com/includes/rj_globnavimages/ncponc_logo.gif</url>
<link>http://www.nature.com/ncponc/</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1176">
<title>Radiation therapy improves survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1176</link>
<description/>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Radiation therapy improves survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1176">doi:10.1038/ncponc1176</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Felix Y Feng
&amp; Edgar Ben-Josef</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Radiation therapy improves survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Felix Y Feng</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Edgar Ben-Josef</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1176</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice Point</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1163">
<title>Adjuvant EBRT improves survival in patients with lymph-node-negative pancreatic cancer</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1163</link>
<description/>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Adjuvant EBRT improves survival in patients with lymph-node-negative pancreatic cancer</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1163">doi:10.1038/ncponc1163</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Lisa J Hazard, Jonathan D Tward
&amp; Dennis C Shrieve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Adjuvant EBRT improves survival in patients with lymph-node-negative pancreatic cancer</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Lisa J Hazard</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Jonathan D Tward</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Dennis C Shrieve</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1163</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-06-24</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice Point</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1174">
<title>The CCR9&#8211;CCL25 axis mediates melanoma metastasis to the small intestine</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1174</link>
<description/>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>The CCR9&#8211;CCL25 axis mediates melanoma metastasis to the small intestine</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1174">doi:10.1038/ncponc1174</a>
</p>
<p>Author: Joost van den Oord</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>The CCR9&#8211;CCL25 axis mediates melanoma metastasis to the small intestine</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Joost van den Oord</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1174</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-06-24</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice Point</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1162">
<title>Bevacizumab plus interferon &#945; in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1162</link>
<description/>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Bevacizumab plus interferon &#945; in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1162">doi:10.1038/ncponc1162</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Przemyslaw Twardowski
&amp; Robert A Figlin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Bevacizumab plus interferon &#945; in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Przemyslaw Twardowski</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Robert A Figlin</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1162</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-06-17</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice Point</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0963">
<title>Does computer-aided detection increase the accuracy of interpretation of mammograms?</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0963</link>
<description/>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Does computer-aided detection increase the accuracy of interpretation of mammograms?</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0963">doi:10.1038/ncponc0963</a>
</p>
<p>Author: Berkman Sahiner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Does computer-aided detection increase the accuracy of interpretation of mammograms?</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Berkman Sahiner</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc0963</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2007-10-02</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-10-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice Point</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0953">
<title>Chemotherapy for osteosarcoma with high-dose methotrexate is effective and outpatient therapy is now possible</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0953</link>
<description/>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Chemotherapy for osteosarcoma with high-dose methotrexate is effective and outpatient therapy is now possible</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0953">doi:10.1038/ncponc0953</a>
</p>
<p>Author: Pete Anderson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Chemotherapy for osteosarcoma with high-dose methotrexate is effective and outpatient therapy is now possible</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Pete Anderson</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc0953</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2007-09-18</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice Point</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0952">
<title>Does adjuvant radiotherapy increase survival in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin?</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0952</link>
<description/>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Does adjuvant radiotherapy increase survival in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin?</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0952">doi:10.1038/ncponc0952</a>
</p>
<p>Author: Marc Bischof</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Does adjuvant radiotherapy increase survival in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin?</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Marc Bischof</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc0952</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2007-09-18</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice Point</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0955">
<title>Aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen: where do we go from here?</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0955</link>
<description/>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen: where do we go from here?</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0955">doi:10.1038/ncponc0955</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Matthew P Goetz
&amp; Charles L Loprinzi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen: where do we go from here?</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Matthew P Goetz</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Charles L Loprinzi</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc0955</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2007-09-11</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice Point</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0936">
<title>The CA125 antigen level as a prognostic versus a predictive test in epithelial ovarian cancer</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0936</link>
<description/>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>The CA125 antigen level as a prognostic versus a predictive test in epithelial ovarian cancer</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0936">doi:10.1038/ncponc0936</a>
</p>
<p>Author: Maurie Markman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>The CA125 antigen level as a prognostic versus a predictive test in epithelial ovarian cancer</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Maurie Markman</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc0936</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2007-09-04</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice Point</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1175">
<title>Who should receive myeloablative therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1175</link>
<description>Over half of all newly-diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients can be cured with first line treatment based on the combination of rituximab with anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens. The authors of this Viewpoint discuss the use of high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support in patients with DLBCL who have relapsed or are refractory to first line treatment.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Who should receive myeloablative therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1175">doi:10.1038/ncponc1175</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Luciano Wannesson
&amp; Emanuele Zucca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Who should receive myeloablative therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Luciano Wannesson</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Emanuele Zucca</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1175</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Viewpoint</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0954">
<title>Stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer&#8212;the triumph of technology over biology?</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0954</link>
<description>Should patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer who are unsuitable for surgery receive hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy? In the rush to implement new technology, there could be a danger of overlooking refinements important to ensure safety, according to the author of this Viewpoint.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer&#8212;the triumph of technology over biology?</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0954">doi:10.1038/ncponc0954</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: David Ball
&amp; H Rodney Withers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer&#8212;the triumph of technology over biology?</dc:title>
<dc:creator>David Ball</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>H Rodney Withers</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc0954</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2007-09-11</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Viewpoint</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1173">
<title>Mechanisms of Disease: survival benefit of temsirolimus validates a role for mTOR in the management of advanced RCC</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1173</link>
<description>Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an important and clinically relevant therapeutic target. Temsirolimus has significantly improved overall survival rates in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, thereby validating the importance of mTOR in the natural history of this disease. This Review discusses the clinical development of temsirolimus, its novel mechanism of action, and the investigational strategies for targeting mTOR in other tumor types.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Mechanisms of Disease: survival benefit of temsirolimus validates a role for mTOR in the management of advanced RCC</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1173">doi:10.1038/ncponc1173</a>
</p>
<p>Author: Robert A Figlin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Mechanisms of Disease: survival benefit of temsirolimus validates a role for mTOR in the management of advanced RCC</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Robert A Figlin</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1173</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1179">
<title>The role of hormonal therapy in the management of hormonal-receptor-positive breast cancer with co-expression of HER2</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1179</link>
<description>Estrogen-deprivation strategies with aromatase inhibitors are superior to tamoxifen in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant and advanced breast-cancer settings in postmenopausal patients. Short-term hormonal resistance especially in the HER2-positive patient population, however, is a significant issue with these endocrine agents. The authors discuss the progress made in our understanding of resistance to endocrine therapy, and provide insights regarding the management of patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>The role of hormonal therapy in the management of hormonal-receptor-positive breast cancer with co-expression of HER2</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1179">doi:10.1038/ncponc1179</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Aleix Prat
&amp; Jos&#233; Baselga</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>The role of hormonal therapy in the management of hormonal-receptor-positive breast cancer with co-expression of HER2</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Aleix Prat</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Jos&#233; Baselga</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1179</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-07-08</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1156">
<title>Drug Insight: intracellular inhibitors of HER2&#8212;clinical development of lapatinib in breast cancer</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1156</link>
<description>There are few treatment options for patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer who are unresponsive to trastuzumab. The combination of lapatinib and capecitabine significantly prolongs time to disease progression in women previously treated with chemotherapy and trastuzumab for HER2-positive advanced disease. The rationale for using this combination and the promising activity of lapatinib in early trials of inflammatory breast cancer is highlighted.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Drug Insight: intracellular inhibitors of HER2&#8212;clinical development of lapatinib in breast cancer</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1156">doi:10.1038/ncponc1156</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: David A Cameron
&amp; Steven Stein</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Drug Insight: intracellular inhibitors of HER2&#8212;clinical development of lapatinib in breast cancer</dc:title>
<dc:creator>David A Cameron</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Steven Stein</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1156</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1161">
<title>Combined targeting of EGFR-dependent and VEGF-dependent pathways: rationale, preclinical studies and clinical applications</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1161</link>
<description>It is unlikely that tumors are entirely dependent on only one abnormally activated signaling pathway and, consequently, treatment with an agent interfering with a single target may be insufficient. This Review discusses the experimental and early-stage clinical evidence to support the relevance of EGFR-dependent and VEGF-dependent pathways, their functional links and the implications of acquired resistance to targeted therapies.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Combined targeting of EGFR-dependent and VEGF-dependent pathways: rationale, preclinical studies and clinical applications</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1161">doi:10.1038/ncponc1161</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Giampaolo Tortora, Fortunato Ciardiello
&amp; Giampietro Gasparini</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Combined targeting of EGFR-dependent and VEGF-dependent pathways: rationale, preclinical studies and clinical applications</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Giampaolo Tortora</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Fortunato Ciardiello</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Giampietro Gasparini</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1161</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1159">
<title>Chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy: persisting uncertainties</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1159</link>
<description>There is a paucity of phase III data comparing chemoradiation with radiation alone for treating invasive bladder cancer; however, an ongoing Australian trial is attempting to address this lack of data. Strategies that combine systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been explored and have yielded better local control than either modality alone. The role of systemic chemotherapy and the controversies surrounding the use of radical surgery versus chemoradiation are discussed.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy: persisting uncertainties</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1159">doi:10.1038/ncponc1159</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Toni K Choueiri
&amp; Derek Raghavan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy: persisting uncertainties</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Toni K Choueiri</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Derek Raghavan</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1159</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-06-24</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1155">
<title>Mechanisms of Disease: temozolomide and glioblastoma&#8212;look to the future</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1155</link>
<description>Until recently, the standard of care for the treatment of glioblastoma involved surgical resection followed by radiation therapy with or without nitrosourea-based chemotherapy. In 2005, a large trial established adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy and radiotherapy as a new standard therapy. This Review summarizes new developments in the treatment of glioblastoma and speculates on possible future treatment strategies for managing this aggressive cancer.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Mechanisms of Disease: temozolomide and glioblastoma&#8212;look to the future</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1155">doi:10.1038/ncponc1155</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Maciej M Mrugala
&amp; Marc C Chamberlain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Mechanisms of Disease: temozolomide and glioblastoma&#8212;look to the future</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Maciej M Mrugala</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Marc C Chamberlain</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1155</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1137">
<title>Predictive factors for chemotherapy-related toxic effects in patients with colorectal cancer</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1137</link>
<description>Many drugs are used to treat colorectal cancer but there is little information about how predictive factors can be used to improve treatment response and reduce toxic effects related to anticancer treatment. The authors of this Review analyse the main data in this investigation field, and highlight the most important predictive factors that relate to toxic effects in patients with colorectal cancer who are treated with anticancer chemotherapy, both in adjuvant and in advanced setting.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Predictive factors for chemotherapy-related toxic effects in patients with colorectal cancer</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1137">doi:10.1038/ncponc1137</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Bruno Vincenzi, Gaia Schiavon, Francesco Pantano, Daniele Santini
&amp; Giuseppe Tonini</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Predictive factors for chemotherapy-related toxic effects in patients with colorectal cancer</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Bruno Vincenzi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Gaia Schiavon</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Francesco Pantano</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Daniele Santini</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Giuseppe Tonini</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1137</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1134">
<title>Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival?</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1134</link>
<description>Although many studies have investigated the associations between stress-related psychosocial factors and cancer outcomes, the results have been inconclusive. The authors of this Review use meta-analytical methods from 165 studies to determine if there is an association, and discuss the results indicating that stress-related psychosocial factors have an adverse effect on cancer incidence and survival.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival?</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1134">doi:10.1038/ncponc1134</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Yoichi Chida, Mark Hamer, Jane Wardle
&amp; Andrew Steptoe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival?</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Yoichi Chida</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Mark Hamer</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Jane Wardle</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Andrew Steptoe</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1134</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-05-20</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1157">
<title>Audiologic and radiographic response of NF2-related vestibular schwannoma to erlotinib therapy</title>
<link>http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1157</link>
<description>The tumor suppressor syndrome neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion. Plotkin  et al. report the case of a 48-year-old man who was diagnosed with progressive NF2-related vestibular schwannomas and received erlotinib therapy, which resulted in improved audiologic and radiographic responses. The authors discuss the potential effectiveness of targeted therapies for progressive vestibular schwannoma in NF2 patients.</description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p>
<b>Audiologic and radiographic response of NF2-related vestibular schwannoma to erlotinib therapy</b>
</p>
<p>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1157">doi:10.1038/ncponc1157</a>
</p>
<p>Authors: Scott R Plotkin, Marybeth A Singh, Caroline C O'Donnell, Gordon J Harris, Andrea I McClatchey
&amp; Chris Halpin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<dc:title>Audiologic and radiographic response of NF2-related vestibular schwannoma to erlotinib therapy</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Scott R Plotkin</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Marybeth A Singh</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Caroline C O'Donnell</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Gordon J Harris</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Andrea I McClatchey</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Chris Halpin</dc:creator>
<dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/ncponc1157</dc:identifier>
<dc:source>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</dc:source>
<dc:date>2008-06-17</dc:date>
<prism:publicationName>Nature Clinical Practice Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Case Study</prism:section>
<prism:startingPage/>
<prism:endingPage/>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
