Editorial

Nature Clinical Practice Oncology (2008) 5, 363
doi:10.1038/ncponc1177  

Lost in translation—prognostic signatures for breast cancer

Lajos Pusztai

This article has no abstract so we have provided the first paragraph of the full text.

The number of prognostic gene signatures reported for breast cancer has increased dramatically in the past 5 years. The use of genomic prognostic assays, however, remains low, both in routine practice and in clinical trials. Currently, there are three commercially available genomic prognostic assays: Oncotype DX®, MammaPrint®, and H/I®. Only the Oncotype DX® assay is used frequently in routine practice, although the other two assays were only recently introduced to the market. In addition, there are only two ongoing randomized clinical trials in breast cancer that use genomic assays for risk stratification: TAILORx and MINDACT. This situation might be considered reminiscent of the single-gene prognostic marker research field, where thousands of manuscripts were published over several decades but only three biomarkers, namely PR, ER, and HER2 were, and are still, used in the clinic routinely.

Full text of this article is available with one of the following:
  1. Personal subscription Purchase your own personal subscription to this journal. Already a subscriber? Please log in for immediate access.
  2. 7 day single article pass for US$18 In order to purchase this article you must be a registered user. Please register or log in.
  3. Site licence Learn more about institutional site licences

Current Subscribers

Please log in to access the full text article using the login box at the top of the page.



Extra navigation

.