Introduction

Heterostructures consisting of two-dimensional (2D) layers of graphene, hexagonal boron-nitride (h-BN), MoS2 and so on coupled by van der Waals interactions1,2 exhibit many intriguing physical properties2 and new device functionalities that are not achievable by individual constituting materials3,4,5,6,7. In particular, graphene/h-BN heterostructures have shown great potentials for band structure engineering of graphene8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 including inducing a bandgap11,13,15,16,17,18,19,20 (Fig. 1a), which is of great fundamental21,22,23,24 and technological25 interest. The coupling between graphene and h-BN results in a periodic moiré superlattice potential due to a 1.8% lattice mismatch8, which gives rise to superlattice minibands and new Dirac points near the edges of the superlattice Brillouin zone8,9,10,11,12,14. Furthermore, the local sublattice symmetry of graphene is broken owing to different local potentials produced by boron and nitrogen atoms17,18,19 (Fig. 1b), inducing a local bandgap18,19. Although this effect varies spatially and is predicted to nearly disappear after spatial averaging18, transport studies showed signatures of a global bandgap in these heterostructures11,13. It is suggested that many-body interactions may be responsible for the observed bandgap15,16, but the issue remains unresolved experimentally.

Figure 1: Graphene/h-BN heterostructures.
figure 1

(a) Energy spectrum of pristine graphene (left) and gapped graphene (right). (b) Schematic of the moire pattern in graphene on h-BN with zero crystallographic rotation angle and an exaggerated lattice mismatch of 11% (carbon, grey; boron, blue; and nitrogen, red). The lattice alignments in different regions lead to different local sublattice symmetry breaking in graphene. (c) Atomic force microscopy image of a monolayer graphene sample grown on h-BN and treated by hydrogen plasma etching, with bare BN shown in dark colour. The inset shows the observed moiré pattern with a periodicity of 15±1 nm. (d) Schematic of the magneto-optical measurements.

Here we report the observation of a finite bandgap in epitaxially grown graphene/h-BN heterostructures with zero crystallographic rotation angle12 (Fig. 1c; see Methods section) by probing their Landau levels (LL) using magneto-optical spectroscopy. The inter-band (inter-LL) transition peaks measured by optical spectroscopy are determined by peaks in the joint density of states between two bands (LLs), which are not limited by disorder26,27 such as impurities and defects, and therefore enable the measurement of the intrinsic bandgap. On the other hand, disorder may lead to a reduced mobility gap (or thermal activation gap) measured by other techniques compared with the intrinsic gap26,27.

At zero magnetic field, the energy dispersion of graphene with a bandgap Δ is11,28 , where vF is the Fermi velocity and p is the momentum (Fig. 1a). In a magnetic field, B, the electronic spectrum of pristine graphene is quantized into LLs described by refs 11, 28:

where e is the elementary charge, is Planck’s constant divided by 2π, the integer n is LL index, and sgn(n) is the sign function. The LLs for gapped graphene have the form28:

which features two zeroth LLs labelled as n=+0 and n=−0 with energies of E±0 =±Δ/2. Here δ is the Kronecker delta function. Therefore, the bandgap of graphene can be explored by probing its LL energy spectrum.

Our study provides a direct spectroscopic determination of the bandgap in epitaxial graphene/h-BN heterostructures from optical measurements of LL transitions. We observe an intrinsic bandgap of ~38 meV (440 K) in this system, which is comparable to the gap value found in transport studies11,13. Moreover, we find different values of effective Fermi velocity for different LL transitions, indicating LL renormalization by interaction effects. These findings have broad implications for the fundamental understanding of graphene heterostructures and their potential applications.

Results

Transmission spectra in magnetic field

Infrared (IR) transmission spectra T(B) were measured in magnetic field applied perpendicular to the samples as shown in Fig. 1d (see Methods section). Figure 2 depicts the T(B)/T(B0) spectra for a representative sample, where B0=0 T. Data for more samples are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Three dip features denoted as T1, T2 and T3 are observed, all of which systematically shift to higher energies with increasing magnetic field. The zero-field transmission spectrum T(B0) of either pristine or gapped graphene shows a step-like feature without any sharp resonances in the energy range explored here, so the observed dip features in the T(B)/T(B0) spectra are corresponding to transmission minima in T(B) and thus absorption peaks in magnetic fields (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 1).

Figure 2: Magneto-transmission ratio spectra of graphene/h-BN.
figure 2

(a) Colour rendition of the −ln[T(B)/T(B0)] spectra as a function of magnetic field and energy for sample 1, where B0=0 T. (b) Schematic of LLs of gapped graphene. The arrows indicate transitions observed in this study. (c,d) Several representative T(B)/T(B0) spectra for sample 1; dashed lines are guides to eyes. For clarity, the data in c and d are displaced from one another by 0.06 and 0.02, respectively.

The effective bulk mobility of our samples estimated from the widths of the resonances in the optical spectra is higher than 50,000 cm2 V−1 s−1 (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 2). Our optical data also indicate that the Fermi energy for our samples is in the range of EF <19 meV (Supplementary Note 3).

Observed LL transitions

The energies (E) of all observed features in graphene/h-BN exhibit an approximate linear dependence on (or equivalently, E2 has an approximate linear dependence on B) in our spectral range as shown in Fig. 3. However, they all show non-zero energy intercepts at zero magnetic field under linear extrapolations, in stark contrast to the LL transitions of pristine graphene described by equation (1), which converge to zero energy at zero field29,30. Similar behaviours were observed in all five samples we have measured (Supplementary Fig. 1). Within the non-interacting single-particle picture, the finite zero-field extrapolation values of all observed absorption energies suggest that the LLs of our graphene/h-BN samples are described by equation (2). From the selection rule31 for allowed optical transitions from LLn to LLn, Δn=|n|−|n′|=±1, and a quantitative comparison with equation (2), we assign feature T1 to transitions of LL-1→LL+0 and LL-0→LL+1 (Fig. 2b), with an energy given by:

Figure 3: LL transition energies of graphene/h-BN.
figure 3

(a) All observed transitions shown in a E2B plot. Symbols: data for sample 1 and 2. Solid lines: best fits to the data for sample 1 using equations (3)–(5), , and parameters discussed in the text. Δ=38 meV and are used for the fit to T3 transition shown here. (b) The low energy part of a to highlight the extraction of the gap. Dashed line: a guide for eye showing linear extrapolation of the data. The error bars in both panels, δ(E2) , are calculated as δ(E2) = 2(E) , where δ(E) is the uncertainty in determining the energy of each LL transition from the T(B)/T(B0) spectra.

Fitting the T1 feature based on equation (3) from a least squares fit yields a bandgap Δ≈38±4 meV and an effective Fermi velocity (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Note 4). We emphasize that the bandgap explored here is at the main Dirac point of graphene instead of the secondary Dirac points at the edges of graphene/BN superlattice Brillouin zone8,9,10,11,12. The T1 transition energies in Fig. 2 are well below the energy (~200 meV) of the secondary Dirac points9,10,11,12, so the LLs in this energy region are not significantly affected by the strong band structure modifications at the boundary of the superlattice Brillouin zone, which is supported by the observed linear dependence of the LL transition energy.

The observed T2 and T3 features have higher energies compared with T1 features and can be assigned as (Fig. 2b): T2, LL−2→LL+1 and LL−1→LL+2; T3, LL−3→LL+2 and LL−2→LL+3. Their energies are described by:

The energies of T2 transition show a deviation from linear dependence above 4 T (or 220 meV in energy) as shown in Fig. 3, with E2 deviating from a linear B-dependence, which is perhaps due to the effect of moiré superlattice or many-body interactions. Therefore, we focus on the low field (<4 T) region where the T2 transition exhibits an overall linear dependence, which most likely arises from the intrinsic behaviours of gapped graphene alone. We observed a splitting of the T2 transition near 169 meV owing to the coupling to the IR active phonon of h-BN, which nonetheless does not affect the main conclusions of our analysis because this effect only occurs in a very narrow field and energy range. Based on equation (4), we find that the T2 transition in low field is consistent with a bandgap similar to that extracted from the T1 transition, Δ≈38±4 meV, and an effective Fermi velocity (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Note 4). The T3 transition is discussed in details below and in Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Note 4.

Comparison with pristine and gapped graphene

We stress that our data on graphene/h-BN cannot be explained by many-body effects of pristine graphene (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Note 5). One prominent feature of interaction effects in pristine graphene is that the effective Fermi velocity varies for different LL transitions, so that the energy ratios E T 2 /[( 2 +1) E T 1 ] and E T 3 /[( 3 + 2 ) E T 1 ] are higher than one, as demonstrated by previous IR studies29 and our data on graphene on SiO2. However, the data for graphene/h-BN exhibit an entirely different behaviour (Fig. 4a) compared with interaction effects in pristine graphene. Instead, the energy ratios of different LL transitions for graphene/h-BN are consistent with the behaviours of gapped graphene. A theoretical result of E T 2 /[( 2 +1) E T 1 ] based on equations (3) and (4) is shown in Fig. 4a, with Δ≈38 meV, and , which agrees very well with the experimental results.

Figure 4: Many-body effects on LL transitions for pristine and gapped graphene.
figure 4

(a) Energy ratios of different LL transitions for graphene on SiO2 (blue colour) and graphene/h-BN sample 1 (red colour) shown in a common vertical scale. Open symbols: E T 2 /[( 2 +1) E T 1 ]. Solid symbols: E T 3 /[( 3 + 2 ) E T 1 ]. Red solid line: theoretical result of E T 2 /[( 2 +1) E T 1 ] based on equations (3) and (4) for gapped graphene. The ratios for graphene on SiO2 are >1, which is a signature of interaction effects in pristine graphene (Supplementary Note 5). On the other hand, the ratios for graphene/h-BN exhibit an entirely different behaviour, which is consistent with gapped graphene. The error bars of energy ratios are calculated using standard formulas for propagation of uncertainty for division based on the uncertainty in determining the energy of each LL transition from the T(B)/T(B0) spectra. (b) Fermi velocity ratios of different LL transitions for graphene/h-BN with a constant . For T2 transition, a constant Fermi velocity is extracted from the data. These ratios are distinct from the value expected from the single-particle picture, which is indicative of interaction effects in gapped graphene. The error bars indicate the range of Fermi velocity values that could fit the data in Fig. 3 (Supplementary Note 4).

Discussion

Previous transport measurements on graphene/h-BN heterostructures indicated a gap of ~300 K at 0.4° crystallographic rotational angle (θ)11. A recent study13 reported the existence of large domains of graphene with the same lattice constant as h-BN separated by domain walls with concentrated strain for small θ, and a gap of 360 K was found for θ=0°. Our optical study provides a direct spectroscopic determination of the bandgap with similar magnitude (~440 K) in epitaxial graphene/h-BN heterostructures. This bandgap value is larger than those found in theories within the single-particle picture18,19,20, which suggests the relevance of many-body interactions in generating the gap15,16. It was argued that the gap at the Dirac point is greatly enhanced by interaction effects due to coupling to a constant sublattice-asymmetric superlattice potential15, which is not affected by the spatial variations shown in Fig. 1b. The intrinsic gap value for graphene/h-BN obtained in our study provides a critical input for the basic understanding of the gap in this system.

Our study further reveals the crucial role of many-body interactions in renormalizing LL transitions32 in graphene/h-BN heterostructures. Specifically, the effective Fermi velocity associated with the LL transitions varies with particular transitions as well as the magnetic field. We find that the T3 transition cannot be consistently fitted by equation (5) using a constant vF, so we use an effective field-dependent parameter (B) to describe this transition (Supplementary Note 4). Figure 4b depicts the Fermi velocity ratios and , both of which are higher than one and therefore very different from the constant vF for all transitions expected from single-particle pictures. Intriguingly, shows a systematic increase in low magnetic fields. For T2 transitions (consider LL−1→LL+2, for example), it shows even at 1 T field with E T 2 =115 meV (Supplementary Fig. 1c), which corresponds to ELL+2 ~66 meV and ELL−1 ~49 meV. According to theoretical studies33, the band structure of graphene/BN at such low energy scales are quite linear and not strongly modified by the superlattice Dirac points (~200 meV; refs 9, 10, 11, 12), so the value extracted from data at low magnetic field (thus low energy) is little affected by the superlattice Dirac points. Similar argument can be made for T1 and T3 transitions at low magnetic fields and low energy. Note that the LL transitions at high field and high energy (for instance, T2 transition above 4 T field) may be affected by the band structure modification due to the superlattice Dirac points8,33, but our discussions here are only focused on the low field regime shown in Fig. 4b. Our results in Fig. 4b indicate LL renormalization due to many-body interactions in magnetic field. Theoretical studies34,35,36,37 showed that interaction effects of electron-hole excitations between LLs, such as direct Coulomb interactions between the excited electrons and holes and the exchange self-energy of electrons and holes between LLs, can significantly renormalize the inter-LL transition energy. The observation shown in Fig. 4b in gapped graphene is qualitatively similar to the results from many-body theories34,35,36,37 as well as experimental studies29 on pristine graphene, so our results strongly suggest contributions of many-body effects to the inter-LL transitions34,35,36,37. Further theoretical investigations are required to quantitatively understand these interactions in gapped graphene, with many open questions yet to be addressed such as the role of superlattice potential15 and bond distortion20 in graphene/h-BN heterostructures.

Multi-valley (band extrema in momentum space) Dirac systems such as gapped graphene, silicene and 2D transition metal dichalcogenides are described by the same Dirac Hamiltonian and share several essential properties such as valley-dependent orbital magnetic moment and Berry curvature23,38, which are intimately related to their unconventional valley-dependent LL structures38,39,40. In this context, the strong LL renormalization observed here has broad implications for fundamental studies of many novel phenomena related to LLs in these Dirac materials, such as magnetic control of valley degree of freedom38 and valley-spin polarized magneto-optical response39,40.

In summary, we have observed a bandgap of ~38 meV (440 K) in graphene/h-BN heterostructures with zero crystallographic rotation angle using magneto-optical spectroscopy. The intrinsic gap value reported here is important for fundamental understanding of the bandgap and many-body interaction effects in this system. Our demonstration of a finite bandgap in epitaxial graphene/h-BN heterostructures can also lead to novel applications in electronics and optoelectronics.

Methods

Sample preparation and characterization

h-BN was mechanically exfoliated onto double-side-polished SiO2/Si substrates with 300 nm SiO2. Graphene was epitaxially grown on h-BN by remote plasma enhanced chemical vapour deposition12. Some multilayer grains can be found on monolayer graphene in as-grown samples, so hydrogen plasma etching technique12 was applied to reduce these additional grains. The resulting sample is continuous monolayer graphene with minor etched hexagonal pitches in plane, as shown in Fig. 1c. The moiré pattern (Fig. 1c) due to lattice mismatch shows a periodicity of 15±1 nm as measured by atomic force microscopy, indicating zero crystallographic alignment angle between graphene and h-BN12. This moiré pattern is observed over the entire areas of all samples, establishing these epitaxial samples as single-crystalline and single-domain graphene heterostructures. The samples studied in this work have typical lateral sizes of ~100 μm. The observed sharp LL transitions indicate that the optical absorption of our samples is little affected by defects or grain boundaries. The effective mobility of our samples estimated from the widths of the resonances in the optical spectra is higher than 50,000 cm2 V−1 s−1 (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 2). The absence of the LL−1→LL−0 and LL+0→LL+1 transitions in our optical data indicates that the Fermi energy is within the gap for our samples, namely EF <19 meV (Supplementary Note 3).

Magneto-transmission measurements

The measurements were performed at ~4.5 K in a superconducting or resistive magnet in the Faraday geometry (magnetic field perpendicular to the sample surface). IR light from a Fourier transform spectrometer is delivered to the sample using a copper light pipe, and the light transmitted through the sample is detected by a composite Si bolometer. The focus of the IR light on the sample is ~0.5–1 mm. To reduce the stray light around our small samples, an aluminium aperture of ~200 μm diameter was placed around the sample. We report data at energies above 60 meV corresponding to wavelengths shorter than 20 μm, which ensures that the wavelength is significantly smaller than the sizes of the samples, and therefore a macroscopic description of the data using optical constants is applicable.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Chen, Z.-G. et al. Observation of an intrinsic bandgap and Landau level renormalization in graphene/boron-nitride heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 5:4461 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5461 (2014).