Abstract
Mounting evidence indicates that oncogenic Ras can modulate cell autonomous inflammatory cytokine production, although the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here we show that squamous cell carcinoma antigens 1 and 2 (SCCA1/2), members of the Serpin family of serine/cysteine protease inhibitors, are transcriptionally upregulated by oncogenic Ras via MAPK and the ETS family transcription factor PEA3. Increased SCCA expression leads to inhibition of protein turnover, unfolded protein response, activation of NF-κB and is essential for Ras-mediated cytokine production and tumour growth. Analysis of human colorectal and pancreatic tumour samples reveals a positive correlation between Ras mutation, enhanced SCCA expression and IL-6 expression. These results indicate that SCCA is a Ras-responsive factor that plays an important role in Ras-associated cytokine production and tumorigenesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Constitutively active mutants of Ras are found in a large number of human cancers1,2. Among the oncogenic activities of mutant Ras, its ability to alter the tumour microenvironment has been well appreciated with numerous studies implicating Ras in various non-cell autonomous processes including basement membrane degradation, immune cell infiltration and angiogenesis3,4. This tumour microenvironment altering function of Ras is at least partially caused by the ability of Ras to induce the production and secretion of proinflammatory and pro-tumorigenic cytokines. As cellular senescence has been largely attributed to the cytokine secretory response termed senescence-associated secretion phenotype (SASP)5,6, the possibility remains that oncogene-induced secretory profile is a senescence-independent process on Ras activation. Several reports have implicated Ras in the ability to modulate the tumour microenvironment at least due in part to Ras’ ability to promote the production of cytokines and chemokines such as Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, granulocyte–macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in a cell autonomous manner3,4,7,8. Therefore, it remains to be determined whether premature senescence is a prerequisite of oncogene-induced secretory phenotype, and how Ras mechanistically regulates the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines.
Squamous cell carcinoma antigens (SCCAs) are members of the serpin family of endogenous protease inhibitors. Approximately 98 and 92% homologous at their nucleotide and amino-acid levels, respectively, SCCA1 (SerpinB3) and SCCA2 (SerpinB4) are ‘suicide-substrate’ protease inhibitors with differing substrate specificities because of amino-acid differences within their reactive site loop domain9. Upregulated in numerous cancers (the cervical, lung, head and neck, liver and breast)10,11,12,13, both SCCA1 and SCCA2 are thought to promote cell survival through the inhibition of cell death14,15. Moreover, the level of SCCA has been shown to predict pathological grade, disease stage, recurrence and response to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy16,17,18. Despite SCCA’s well-reported involvement in cancer, how SCCA is transcriptionally upregulated during transformation and contributes to tumour development remains largely unknown. Here, we study the oncogenic regulation of SCCA and uncover a novel proinflammatory role for SCCA downstream of mutant Ras. We demonstrate that through MAPK signalling and the ETS transcription factor PEA3, oncogenic Ras upregulates the expression of SCCA1/2 (SerpinB3/B4) to promote inflammatory cytokine production and xenograft tumour growth. Moreover, SCCA upregulation is observed in human colorectal and pancreatic cancer. Our findings suggest an important role of serpins in Ras-driven tumorigenesis.
Results
Oncogenic Ras upregulates SCCA expression
Elevated expression of SCCA has been found in numerous human cancers. However, the underlying molecular mechanism of its upregulation remains unclear. We began to study this by expressing several oncoproteins (HRasV12, myristolated-Akt (myr-Akt), and c-Myc) in IMR90 primary human lung fibroblasts. While myr-Akt and c-Myc failed to induce SCCA expression, HRasV12 led to a marked increase in SCCA protein levels (Fig. 1a). The SCCA antibody utilized was unable to distinguish between the SCCA isoforms10, although quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT–PCR) analysis revealed an increase in the transcript levels of both SCCA1 and SCCA2 in response to RasV12 expression (Fig. 1b). This is not surprising as the two SCCA isoforms are tandemly arranged on human chromosome 18q and their promoters are highly homologous19.
To determine whether persistent Ras signalling is required for SCCA expression, we used the oestrogen receptor (ER):RasV12 fusion protein that allows for RasV12 stabilization on the addition of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) to the culture medium20. While 4-OHT induced the expression of Ras and SCCA (Fig. 1c), removal of 4-OHT led to a drastic reduction in RasV12 protein levels and diminished downstream signalling indicated by decreased phospho-ERK, accompanied by a reduction of SCCA at both protein and transcript levels (Fig. 1c,d), indicating that sustained Ras signalling is required for maintaining SCCA expression.
In addition to HRasV12, expression of KRasV12 or NRasQ61 also resulted in elevated SCCA expression in IMR90 cells (Fig. 1e). Similar to IMR90 cells, increased SCCA expression was observed by expressing HRasV12 in the BJ primary human foreskin fibroblast cells, and by expression of KRasV12 in a number of cancer cell lines with wild-type Ras, including the colon cancer cell lines HT-29 and Caco-2, and HeLa cells (Fig. 1f). Taken together, these results indicate that upregulation of SCCA expression is a general feature of oncogenic Ras proteins in various human cell lines.
It is important to note that in IMR90 and BJ fibroblasts expression of RasV12 elicits oncogene-induced senescence21. The upregulation of SCCA in response to RasV12 in Caco-2, HT-29 and HeLa cells, which do not undergo senescence3,22, suggests that upregulation of SCCA by RasV12 is independent of cellular senescence. To further elucidate that the increased SCCA expression is not a consequence of cellular senescence, we induced premature senescence by treating IMR90 cells with etoposide or H2O2 and replicative senescence by continually passaging the cells. Indeed, unlike RasV12, these senescence-inducing conditions failed to upregulate SCCA expression (Fig. 2). These results indicate that expression of oncogenic Ras stimulates expression of SCCA in a manner that is independent of oncogene-induced senescence.
Ras-induced SCCA is dependent on the MAPK/PEA3 pathway
To elucidate the mechanism by which RasV12 stimulates SCCA expression, we used pharmacological inhibitors to selectively inhibit MAPK and Akt pathways that are well characterized to be activated by Ras2,23. While inhibition of Akt signalling had little to no effect on SCCA expression (Fig. 3a,b), the MEK inhibitor U0126 caused a marked inhibition of both SCCA1 and SCCA2 transcription in both IMR90 (Fig. 3c,d) and HeLa cells (Supplementary Fig. 1a,b). Similarly, expression of the dominant-negative ERK2 blocked Ras-induced SCCA expression (Supplementary Fig. 1c,d). Along the Ras/Raf/MAPK/ERK pathway, expression of oncogenic BRafV600E also induced SCCA expression (Supplementary Fig. 1e). We next sought to identify which transcription factor may be mediating Ras-induced expression of SCCA. The ETS transcription factor family member PEA3 has been shown to be modulated by MAPK via sumolyation24 and can activate SCCA transcription25. Indeed, silencing of PEA3 in RasV12-expressing cells (Fig. 3e) resulted in a drastic decrease of both SCCA1 and SCCA2 at protein and transcript levels (Fig. 3f,g), without affecting MAPK signalling indicated by similar levels of phospho-ERK in RasV12-expressing cells (Fig. 3f). This PEA3-dependent SCCA expression was also observed in RasV12-expressing HeLa cells (Supplementary Fig. 2a–c) and was rescued by expression of wild-type murine PEA3, but not by a PEA3 sumolyation-defective mutant24 (Supplementary Fig. 2d–f). These results indicate that mutant Ras leads to SCCA upregulation via the MAPK/PEA3 pathway.
SCCA is essential for Ras-induced cytokine production
Next we examined the biological role of elevated SCCA expression. We chose to focus on using the IMR90 cell line that is widely used for studying the effect of Ras activation during the early phase of tumorigenesis. We began by examining the downstream signalling pathways activated by oncogenic Ras (MAPK, Akt, NF-κB). To this end, SCCA expression was silenced in RasV12-expressing cells using two independent shRNA constructs that effectively silenced both SCCA1 and SCCA2 (Fig. 4a), and the signalling pathways examined by respective phosphorylation antibodies. While loss of SCCA had little to no effect on the ability of mutant Ras to activate Akt and MAPK phosphorylation (Fig. 4b), loss of SCCA significantly diminished RasV12-induced RelA/p65 phosphorylation that is indicative of NF-κB activation (Fig. 4b). This effect was further confirmed by utilizing a NF-κB luciferase reporter construct (Fig. 4c).
Activation of NF-κB signalling has been attributed to cytokine production downstream of Ras activation26. Indeed, inhibition of NF-κB signalling using the pharmacological inhibitor BAY11-7082 abrogated Ras-induced cytokine production in IMR90 and HeLa cells (Supplementary Fig. 3). Therefore, we examined whether SCCA plays a role in Ras-induced cytokine production and performed a quantitative cytokine array analysis using cell culture media. In agreement with literature5,6, RasV12-expressing cells displayed a marked increase in a spectrum of cytokines including IL-6, IL-8, CXCL1, G-CSF and GM-CSF (Fig. 4d). Consistent with the observed decrease in NF-κB signalling (Fig. 4b,c), this increased cytokine expression was significantly abrogated on SCCA silencing (Fig. 4d,e). Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that the suppression of cytokine production was due to transcriptional downregulation (Fig. 4f) and was rescued by ectopically activating NF-κB signalling with TNFα treatment (Fig. 4g). The SCCA-dependent NF-κB activation and cytokine production downstream of oncogenic Ras were also observed in HeLa and Caco-2 cells (Supplementary Fig. 4). The introduction of oncogenic Ras in IMR90 elicits a DNA damage response that has been reported to mediate cytokine production6,27. However, silencing of SCCA had virtually no effect on Ras-induced DNA damage indicated by the phosphorylation of H2A.X (Fig. 5a,b) or the senescence-associated cell cycle arrest (Fig. 5c). Taken together, these results indicate that SCCA plays an essential role in Ras-mediated NF-κB activation and inflammatory cytokine production that is independent of the DNA-damage response.
SCCA promotes cytokine production by inducing the unfolded protein response
We next sought to understand how SCCA promotes Ras-mediated NF-κB activation and cytokine production. A possible mechanism is through upregulation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), which has been implicated in mediating NF-κB activation and inflammatory transcriptional programmes28. Our previous work showed that SCCA leads to decreased lysosomal and proteasomal protein turnover, two major protein degradation pathways, and hence increases the steady-state level of ER stress29. Thus, we speculated that mutant Ras induces ER stress through upregulation of SCCA. Indeed, the ability of RasV12 to promote an ER stress response has been reported30. Silencing of SCCA relieved the Ras-induced inhibition of protein turnover as measured through total ubiquitinated proteins (Fig. 6a). Furthermore, while RasV12 cells showed a robust increase in UPR indicated by the appearance of proteolytically cleaved ATF6 as well as both unspliced and spliced XBP1, this response was significantly reduced in SCCA-silenced cells (Fig. 6b), indicating that SCCA mediates the UPR induced by RasV12. Silencing of ATF6 or XBP1 in RasV12-expressing cells (Fig. 6c) drastically diminished RasV12-induced cytokine production (Fig. 6d–f; Supplementary Fig. 5) that was accompanied by decreased RelA/p65 phosphorylation (Fig. 6g; Supplementary Fig. 5). Conversely, ectopic expression of the transcriptionally active spliced variant of XBP1 (XBP1s) restored cytokine production in RasV12 cells when SCCA was silenced (Fig. 6h,i). These results indicate that SCCA modulates cytokine production downstream of mutant Ras by stimulating UPR.
SCCA is upregulated in colorectal and pancreatic cancers
Our results thus far show that SCCA is a Ras-responsive gene that plays an essential role in Ras-induced cytokine production. We next sought to identify an in vivo connection between Ras and SCCA expression. Using TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) data of human colorectal cancer, which were available with sizeable samples with the KRas mutation, we identified a positive correlation between the presence of mutant Ras and SCCA upregulation (Fig. 7a). We also chose to examine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), where the mutant KRas functions as the primary driver31. It also offers a unique model where the precursor lesions to PDAC have a defined pathological progression31. To this end, we analysed the pancreatic cancer gene expression data sets for SCCA expression through Oncomine. In the seven available patient data sets, SCCA1 mRNA was upregulated in six and SCCA2 mRNA in three independent data sets32,33,34,35,36,37 (Fig. 7b–d). Of note, the Logsdon data set37 identified both SCCA1 and SCCA2 to be upregulated in pancreatic cancer when compared with chronic pancreatitis (Fig. 7d). To further examine the association of SCCA expression in human pancreatic cancer, we performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) for SCCA using a pancreatic cancer tissue microarray. While all non-neoplastic/normal pancreatic samples were negative for SCCA expression, positive staining for SCCA was seen throughout all stages of pancreatic cancer progression. The incidence of SCCA positivity increased in relation to the progression of pancreatic cancer: 2 out of 17 (11.8%) PanIN-1 lesions, 5 out of 19 (26.3%) PanIN-2 lesions, 8 out of 15 (53.3%) PanIN-3 lesions and 20 out of 30 (66.7%) of PDAC (Fig. 7e; P<0.001). Moreover, consistent with the result that SCCA promotes inflammatory cytokine production in cultured cells, IHC of IL-6 on the same panel of pancreatic tissues showed a positive correlation between IL-6 and SCCA in both PDAC (Fig. 7f,g) and PanIN (Supplementary Fig. 6) samples.
Endogenous SCCA promotes IL-6 production and tumorigenesis
To further explore the physiological relevance of SCCA, we tested the expression and function of SCCA in a setting when mutant Ras is expressed at endogenous levels. RasV12 failed to induce the expression of the SCCA paralogues Serpinb3a or Serpinb3b in immortalized MEF NIH3T3 (Supplementary Fig. 7a) or in primary MEFs (Supplementary Fig. 7b). The failure to detect upregulation of SCCA paralogues in the murine system prevented us from using the well-established LSL-KRas mouse model38. Hence, we instead examined a panel of human pancreatic cancer cell lines that harbour the mutant KRas. We found five out of nine cell lines to be positive for SCCA expression (Fig. 8a). In the cell lines that displayed detectable levels of SCCA and can tolerate loss of KRas (CFPAC-1, L3.6 and Capan-1), silencing of mutant KRas significantly reduced SCCA expression (Fig. 8b). Consistent with the essential role of SCCA in Ras-mediated cytokine production, silencing of SCCA in three SCCA-positive cell lines resulted in decreased expression of IL-6, whereas the SCCA shRNAs did not affect IL-6 expression in the SCCA-low PANC-1 cells (Fig. 8c). Moreover, while silencing of SCCA in CFPAC-1, L3.6 and HPAF-II cells did not compromise cell proliferation in cell culture (Supplementary Fig. 8), it led to impaired xenograft tumour growth in all three cell lines (Fig. 8d). These results, taken together with the above finding that SCCA positivity correlates with progression of pancreatic cancer development (Fig. 7e), indicate that SCCA expression is under the control of mutant Ras expressed at endogenous level, and that the SCCA-mediated inflammatory response plays a pro-tumorigenic role in Ras-driven cancer.
Discussion
In this study, we show that the endogenous serine/cysteine proteinase inhibitor SCCA is upregulated on activation of oncogenic Ras, in a manner that is dependent on hyper-active MAPK signalling and the ETS transcription factor PEA3. Downstream of oncogenic Ras, SCCA promotes activation of NF-κB signalling and cytokine production by blocking protein turnover and inducing the UPR.
Our study implicates SCCA as a direct link between oncogenic Ras mutation, NF-κB activation and cytokine production. While it has been clearly demonstrated that the mutant Ras can activate NF-κB and induce inflammatory cytokine production in various settings, the underlying molecular mechanism has remained elusive. In numerous settings, inflammatory cytokine production has been attributed to oncogene-induced senescence that is associated with excess production of reactive oxygen species and subsequent DNA damage or loss of p53 (refs 6, 27). We found that oncogenic Ras upregulates SCCA to promote cytokine production, whereas SCCA is not upregulated in the setting of drug-induced and replicative senescence. These results suggest that the secretory response seen in cells with oncogenic Ras mutations may be distinct from SASP induced by DNA damage or loss of p53. Although the physiological significance of Ras-induced cellular senescence remains an open topic, our results show that Ras can induce SCCA expression in cells where Ras does not induce senescence (Fig. 1f). Furthermore, we found that SCCA-dependent cytokine production occurs in human cells expressing endogenous level of mutant Ras (Fig. 8) and this provides a mechanism that uncouples cellular senescence from inflammatory cytokine production on Ras activation. Importantly, our study shows that the incidence of SCCA positivity within PanIN lesions and PDAC increases with disease progression (Fig. 7e). Therefore, monitoring SCCA levels may become an attractive diagnostic tool in pancreatic cancer patients, as the levels of SCCA have been used in numerous studies to successfully predict disease stage and response to therapy16,17,18.
Our work uncovers SCCA as a critical mediator of Ras-induced UPR. Until now, SCCA’s involvement in cancer was largely attributed to its protective role against lysosomal permeability that leads to unscheduled activation of lysosomal proteases29,39. We have previously reported that, through its protease inhibitory activity, SCCA leads to a decrease in both lysosomal and proteasomal protein turnover and elicits a non-lethal level of ER stress response29. It remains to be determined how SCCA mechanistically suppresses protein turnover, and whether other functions of SCCA such as its possible role in the nucleus contribute to increased UPR. Nevertheless, here we show that SCCA-mediated UPR plays a critical role in the context of oncogenic Ras mutation. Enhanced UPR has been well implicated in cancer, largely owing to the highly proliferative status of cancer cells and their encounter of growth limiting conditions such as nutrient deprivation and hypoxia40,41. Targeting the enhanced UPR of cancer cells remains an attractive therapeutic option, although the precise prediction of sensitivity has been difficult. Consistent with this notion, tumours driven by the mutant Ras have been shown to be susceptible to proteotoxic therapies42. Our current work showing that SCCA expression is stimulated by oncogenic Ras and plays an essential role in Ras-induced ER stress response, together with our previous report demonstrating SCCA sensitizes cells to proteotoxic stress29, suggest that SCCA may be a valuable predictor of response to proteotoxic agents in tumours harbouring oncogenic Ras.
The contribution of the tumour stroma and inflammation to tumour development and progression, especially in pancreatic and colorectal cancer, is well accepted43,44. While NF-κB signalling has been shown to mediate the SASP response26, it is critical for the development of Ras-driven lung adenocarcinoma45. The pro-tumorigenic role of SCCA mediating NF-κB activation and inflammatory cytokine production is consistent with these reports. This adds a new pro-tumour mechanism of SCCA in addition to its well-documented anti-cell death function15,46,47,48,49. In a parallel study, we find that ectopic expression of SCCA can independently promote the transformation of the non-tumorigenic mammary epithelial cell line MCF10A (Sheshadri et al., in preparation). As numerous studies utilizing anti-inflammatories to target the tumour microenvironment have shown great promise in the treatment of malignancies50,51, the ability of SCCA to promote cytokine production and tumorigenesis suggests a therapeutic value of targeting its protease inhibitory activity.
Methods
Cell lines and culture
293T, IMR90, BJ, HT-29, Caco-2, HeLa, AsPC-1, Capan-1, Capan-2, CFPAC-1, HPAF-II, L3.6, PANC-1, PL45 and S2-013 cells were cultured according to ATCC recommendations. 293T, HeLa, PANC-1, PL45 and S2-013 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone). IMR90, BJ and HPAF-II cells were cultured in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS. HT-29 and Capan-2 cells were cultured in McCoy’s 5a supplemented with 10% FBS. Caco-2 cells were cultured in MEM supplemented with 20% FBS. AsPC-1 and L3.6 cells were cultured in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS. Capan-1 cells were cultured in Iscove’s supplemented with 20% FBS. CFPAC-1 cells were cultured in Iscove’s supplemented with 10% FBS. All media were supplemented with 100 units per ml penicillin and 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin (Invitrogen).
Plasmids and reagents
Retroviral expression vectors for WZL-hygro and WZL-HRasV12 were a kind gift of Dr Alea Mills at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory21. pBABE-puro and pBABE-KRasV12 were a kind gift of Dr Scott Lowe at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Institute. pBABE-NRasQ61 was purchased from Addgene (Dr Channing Der; Plasmid 12543)52. pLNCX-ER:HRasV12 was a kind gift of Dr Masashi Narita at University of Cambridge20. pcDNA3-FLAG-ERK2-WT and pcDNA3-FLAG-ERK2-T138A (DN) were a kind gift of Dr Scott Eblen at the Medical University of South Carolina53. pcDNA3-PEA3-WT and pcDNA3-PEA3-K123R (MUT) were a kind gift of Dr Andrew Sharrocks at the University of Manchester24. Human XBP1s was cloned by RT-PCR from total RNA from IMR90 cells. Primers used were as follows, forward with HindIII restriction and FLAG tag: 5′-AAGCTTATGGATTACAAGGATGACGATGACAAGTGGTGGTGGCAGCCGCGCCGAACCC-3′ and reverse primer with HindIII restriction site: 5′-AAGCTTTTAGACACTAATCAGCTGGGGAAAG-3′. The RT-PCR product was digested with HindIII and ligated into the pLPC retroviral expression vector. All shRNA lentiviral constructs were in the pLKO (Sigma) backbone. shRNA targeting sequences used are shGFP: 5′-TACAACAGCCACAACGTCTAT-3′; shScramble: 5′-CAACAAGATGAAGAGCACCAA-3′; shSCCA#1: 5′-GCACAACAGATTAAGAAGGTT-3′; shSCCA#2: 5′-CCGCTGTAGTAGGGATTCGGAT-3′; shPEA3: 5′-GCTCCGATACTATTATGAGAA-3′; shATF6: 5′-GCAGCAACCAATTATCAGTTT-3′; shXBP1: 5′-GCCTGTCTGTACTTCCATTCAA-3′; shKRas: 5′-CAGTTGAGACCTTCTAATTGG-3′. Bay-11-7082 (B5556), 4-hydroxytamoxifen (H7904) and crystal violet (C0775) were purchased from Sigma. U0126 (V1121) was purchased from Promega. AKT inhibitor VIII (124018) was purchased from Calbiochem. TNFα (210-TA) was purchased from R&D Systems. X-gal (15520-018) was purchased from Invitrogen. Etoposide (8154-1) was purchased from Clontech.
DNA transfection and viral infection
Both retrovirus and shRNA lentivirus were generated in 293T cells. In brief, 293T were transfected by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) with the plasmid of interest, packaging plasmid, and a plasmid encoding for the VSV-G envelope protein. Forty-eight and seventy-two hours after initial transfection, viral supernatant was collected, filtered, supplemented with polybrene (10 μg ml−1) and used to infect target cells. Forty-eight hours after last infection, cells were selected with appropriate antibiotics. IMR90 cells were selected for 2 days with 100 μg ml−1 of hygromycin, 2 μg ml−1 of puromycin or 1.75 mg ml−1 of G418. HeLa and L3.6 cells were selected with 0.5 μg ml−1 of puromycin for 2 days. Caco-2, Capan-1, CFPAC-1 and PANC-1 cells were selected with 1.0 μg ml−1 of puromycin for 3 days.
Immunoblot analysis
Cell lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer (1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 0.01 M Tris pH 8.0, 0.14 M NaCl). Protein expression was examined by western blotting using antibodies against SCCA1/2 (FL-390; Santa Cruz; 1:1,000), Ras (Clone Ras10; Millipore; 1:10,000), p21 (C-19; Santa Cruz; 1:500), ERK1/2 (4,695; Cell Signaling; 1:10,000), P-ERK1/2 (4,370; Cell Signaling; 1:2;000), Akt (9,272; Cell Signaling; 1;2,000), P-Akt (4,058; Cell Signaling; 1:2,000), P-RelA/p65 (3,031; Cell Signaling; 1;1,000), RelA/p65 (F-6; Santa Cruz; 1:2,000), ATF6 (F-7; Santa Cruz; 1:500), XBP1 (M-186; Santa Cruz; 1:500), Ubiquitin (P4D1; Covance; 1:1,000) and β-tubulin (Sigma; 1:10,000). All primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C. Horseradish peroxidase or Alexafluor-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Rockland) or goat anti-mouse (Rockland) antibodies were used as secondary antibodies (1:2,000). Western blots were developed using an ECL detection kit (Thermo Scientific) or an Odyssey Imager (LI-COR). Full scans of uncropped blots can be found in Supplementary Figs 9,10.
Gene expression analysis and quantitative PCR
Total RNA was isolated and purified using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen). cDNA was obtained by reverse transcribing 1–2 μg of total RNA using SuperscriptIII Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) and used for qPCR. qPCR reactions were performed in triplicate using SYBR Green reagents (Quanta Biosciences) on a StepOnePlus (Life Technologies). GAPDH was used as an endogenous control. All results were normalized to GAPDH. Primer sets used are: GAPDH: 5′-AAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTT G-3′ and 5′-CCATGGGTGGAATCATATTGGAA-3′; SCCA1: 5′-AGCCGCGGTCTCGTGC-3′ and 5′-GGCAGCTGCAGCTTCTG-3′; SCCA2: 5′-AGCCACGGTCTCTCAG-3′ and 5-GCAGCTGCAGCTTCCA-3′; Serpinb3a: 5′-CATTTGTTTGCTGAAGCCACTAC-3′ and 5′-CATGTTCGAAATCCAGTGATTCC-3′; Serpinb3b: 5′-ATTCGTTTTCATGCAGCTGATGT-3′ and 5′-GAAAGCTGAAGTTAAATTTGTTCG-3′; PEA3: 5′-GGACTTCGCCTACGACTCAG-3′ and 5′-CGCAGAGGTTTCTCATAGCC-3′; IL-6: 5′-TCCACAAGCGCCTTCGGTCCA3′ and 5′-AGGGCTGAGATGCCGTCGAGGA-3′; IL-8: 5′-AAGGAAAACTGGGTGCAGAG-3′ and 5′-ATTGCATCTGGCAACCCTAC-3′; CXCL1: 5′-CACCCCAAGAACATCCAAAG-3′ and 5′-TAACTATGGGGGATGCAGGA-3′; G-CSF: 5′-ACTACAAGCAGCACTGCCCT-3′ and 5′-AGCAGTCAAAGGGGATGACA-3′; GM-CSF: 5′-CAAGTGAGGAAGATCCAGGG-3′; and 5′-AGAGAGTGTCCGAGCAGCAC-3′.
Cytokine array
Cells were washed once with PBS and incubated for 8 h with fresh media. Supernatant was collected, cleared by centrifugation and used immediately. The amount of supernatant used was normalized to cell number and used with the human cytokine array kit (R&D Systems). IRDye 800CW Streptavidin (Rockland) was used as secondary (1:2,000) and arrays were imaged and quantified on an Odyssey Imager.
Senescence assays
Senescence was induced by oncogenic Ras, etoposide (100 μM, 48 h), H2O2 (100 μM, 1 h) or long-term passaging (replicative senescence). All cells were analysed 7 days post-selection or post-treatment. For SA-β-gal staining, cells were fixed in 2% formaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 15 min and stained (150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 40 mM NaPi, pH 6.0, 1 μg ml−1 X-Gal) overnight at 37 °C. For BrdU staining, cells were cultured with BrdU (10 nM) for 6 h, fixed with acid ethanol (90% ethanol, 5% acetic acid, 5% H2O) for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed once with PBS, incubated with 2 M HCl for 20 min, 0.1 M sodium borate, pH 8.5 for 2 min and washed once with PBS. Cells were blocked in 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with anti-BrdU (BD Pharmingen, 1:500 in 5% BSA in 0.1% PBS-tween) overnight at 4 °C. Cells were washed, incubated with anti-mouse Alexa-594 (1:500) for 1 h at room temperature, washed, co-stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and mounted.
NF-κB luciferase activity assay
NF-κB activity was determined by using an NF-κB luciferase reporter construct where the luciferase gene is under control of the IL-6 promoter and internal control plasmid pCMV-RL using a dual-luciferase reporter system (Promega). Cells were plated 24 h before transfection at 5 × 104 cells per well of 24-well plate. NF-κB-luciferase vector (250 ng) and 100 ng pCMV-RL were used for transfection. Twenty-four hours post transfection, cells were washed with PBS and lysed in 100 μl passive lysis buffer for 10 min. Luciferase activity was determined following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol with a SpectraMax M5 Microplate Reader. The ratios of firefly luciferase versus renilla luciferase are used as relative luciferase activities.
TCGA analysis
TCGA human colorectal cancer (study abbreviation: COADREAD) data were downloaded from Broad Institute’s Genome Data Analysis Center (GDAC). Standard data of somatic mutations (Mutation_Packager_Calls_Level_3) and RNA expression (Merge_transcriptome__agilentg4502a_07_3__unc_edu__Level_3__unc_lowess_normalization _gene_level__data.Level_3) were used. There were 207 human colorectal tumours that have both somatic mutation and mRNA expression data available. KRas was mutated in 87 out of the 207 samples. SCCA mRNA expression level was compared between the groups with wild-type and mutant KRas.
Immunohistochemistry
Tissue microarrays came from the Vanderbilt GI SPORE Tissue Core. Distribution and the use of all human samples were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Stony Brook University, and samples were obtained with informed consent. IHC was performed on a Ventana XT (Tucson, AZ, USA) autostainer, according to the manufacturer’s directions.
Tissue microarray analysis
Damaged core spots and those that did not contain cancerous tissue were eliminated from scoring. The sections were scored independently by two evaluators blinded to the clinical status of the patients. Samples were scored as previously described10. In brief, samples were scored as percent of tumour cells with SCCA or IL-6 expression: 0, no expression; 1, <10%; 2, 10–50%; 3, >50%. For SCCA, a score ≥1 was considered positive. For IL-6, 0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong.
Xenograft tumour experiments
Male athymic nude mice, 6- to 8 weeks old, were obtained from Taconic Farms. Mice were housed and monitored at the Division of Laboratory Animal Resources at Stony Brook University. All experimental procedures and protocols were approved by the Stony Brook University institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC). Tumours were established by resuspending 1 × 106 tumour cells in 100 μl PBS and injecting the cells into the mid-flanks of mice using a 26-gauge needle. For each tumour, the tumour length (l) and width (w) was measured every 4–5 days with an electronic caliper. Tumour volume (v) was calculated using the formula v=(l × w2)/2 and plotted in mm3.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism (Graphpad Software Inc). For gene expression, luciferase activity and xenograft tumour growth significance was calculated with t-tests. χ2-tests were used to assess statistical significance of various categorical clinical features between SCCA-negative and SCCA-positive samples. For the TCGA colorectal cancer data analysis, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was performed. For all tests, P-values were considered statistically significant when <0.05.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Catanzaro, J. M. et al. Oncogenic Ras induces inflammatory cytokine production by upregulating the squamous cell carcinoma antigens SerpinB3/B4. Nat. Commun. 5:3729 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4729 (2014).
References
Bos, J. L. Ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review. Cancer Res. 49, 4682–4689 (1989).
Downward, J. Targeting RAS signalling pathways in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 11–22 (2003).
Sparmann, A. & Bar-Sagi, D. Ras-induced interleukin-8 expression plays a critical role in tumor growth and angiogenesis. Cancer Cell 6, 447–458 (2004).
Pylayeva-Gupta, Y., Lee, K. E., Hajdu, C. H., Miller, G. & Bar-Sagi, D. Oncogenic Kras-induced GM-CSF production promotes the development of pancreatic neoplasia. Cancer Cell 21, 836–847 (2012).
Kuilman, T. et al. Oncogene-induced senescence relayed by an interleukin-dependent inflammatory network. Cell 133, 1019–1031 (2008).
Coppe, J. P. et al. Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor. PLoS Biol. 6, 2853–2868 (2008).
Ancrile, B., Lim, K. H. & Counter, C. M. Oncogenic Ras-induced secretion of IL6 is required for tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 21, 1714–1719 (2007).
Leslie, K. et al. Differential interleukin-6/Stat3 signaling as a function of cellular context mediates Ras-induced transformation. Breast Cancer Res. 12, R80 (2010).
Schneider, S. S. et al. A serine proteinase inhibitor locus at 18q21.3 contains a tandem duplication of the human squamous cell carcinoma antigen gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3147–3151 (1995).
Catanzaro, J. M. et al. Elevated expression of squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) is associated with human breast carcinoma. PLoS ONE 6, e19096 (2011).
Guido, M. et al. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen in human liver carcinogenesis. J. Clin. Pathol. 61, 445–447 (2008).
Vassilakopoulos, T. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of squamous cell carcinoma antigen in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 32, 137–144 (2001).
Cataltepe, S. et al. Co-expression of the squamous cell carcinoma antigens 1 and 2 in normal adult human tissues and squamous cell carcinomas. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 48, 113–122 (2000).
McGettrick, A. F., Barnes, R. C. & Worrall, D. M. SCCA2 inhibits TNF-mediated apoptosis in transfected HeLa cells. The reactive centre loop sequence is essential for this function and TNF-induced cathepsin G is a candidate target. Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 5868–5875 (2001).
Suminami, Y. et al. Inhibition of apoptosis in human tumour cells by the tumour-associated serpin, SCC antigen-1. Br. J. Cancer 82, 981–989 (2000).
Brioschi, P. A., Bischof, P., Delafosse, C. & Krauer, F. Squamous-cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-A) values related to clinical outcome of pre-invasive and invasive cervical carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 47, 376–379 (1991).
Scambia, G. et al. The value of squamous cell carcinoma antigen in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 164, 631–636 (1991).
Ngan, H. Y., Chan, S. Y., Wong, L. C., Choy, D. T. & Ma, H. K. Serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen in the monitoring of radiotherapy treatment response in carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 37, 260–263 (1990).
Suminami, Y. et al. Promoter analyses of SCC antigen genes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1727, 208–212 (2005).
Young, A. R. et al. Autophagy mediates the mitotic senescence transition. Genes Dev. 23, 798–803 (2009).
Serrano, M., Lin, A. W., McCurrach, M. E., Beach, D. & Lowe, S. W. Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 88, 593–602 (1997).
Kikuchi, H., Pino, M. S., Zeng, M., Shirasawa, S. & Chung, D. C. Oncogenic KRAS and BRAF differentially regulate hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and -2alpha in colon cancer. Cancer Res. 69, 8499–8506 (2009).
Baines, A. T., Xu, D. & Der, C. J. Inhibition of Ras for cancer treatment: the search continues. Future Med. Chem. 3, 1787–1808 (2011).
Guo, B. & Sharrocks, A. D. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling initiates a dynamic interplay between sumoylation and ubiquitination to regulate the activity of the transcriptional activator PEA3. Mol. Cell Biol. 29, 3204–3218 (2009).
Iwasaki, M. et al. E1AF/PEA3 reduces the invasiveness of SiHa cervical cancer cells by activating serine proteinase inhibitor squamous cell carcinoma antigen. Exp. Cell Res. 299, 525–532 (2004).
Chien, Y. et al. Control of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype by NF-kappaB promotes senescence and enhances chemosensitivity. Genes Dev. 25, 2125–2136 (2011).
Rodier, F. et al. Persistent DNA damage signalling triggers senescence-associated inflammatory cytokine secretion. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 973–979 (2009).
Garg, A. D. et al. ER stress-induced inflammation: does it aid or impede disease progression? Trends. Mol. Med. 18, 589–598 (2012).
Ullman, E., Pan, J. A. & Zong, W. X. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen 1 promotes caspase-8-mediated apoptosis in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress while inhibiting necrosis induced by lysosomal injury. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 2902–2919 (2011).
Denoyelle, C. et al. Anti-oncogenic role of the endoplasmic reticulum differentially activated by mutations in the MAPK pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 1053–1063 (2006).
Maitra, A. & Hruban, R. H. Pancreatic cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 3, 157–188 (2008).
Pei, H. et al. FKBP51 affects cancer cell response to chemotherapy by negatively regulating Akt. Cancer Cell 16, 259–266 (2009).
Badea, L., Herlea, V., Dima, S. O., Dumitrascu, T. & Popescu, I. Combined gene expression analysis of whole-tissue and microdissected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma identifies genes specifically overexpressed in tumor epithelia. Hepatogastroenterology 55, 2016–2027 (2008).
Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A. et al. Exploration of global gene expression patterns in pancreatic adenocarcinoma using cDNA microarrays. Am. J. Pathol. 162, 1151–1162 (2003).
Segara, D. et al. Expression of HOXB2, a retinoic acid signaling target in pancreatic cancer and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 3587–3596 (2005).
Grutzmann, R. et al. Gene expression profiling of microdissected pancreatic ductal carcinomas using high-density DNA microarrays. Neoplasia 6, 611–622 (2004).
Logsdon, C. D. et al. Molecular profiling of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis identifies multiple genes differentially regulated in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 63, 2649–2657 (2003).
Jackson, E. L. et al. Analysis of lung tumor initiation and progression using conditional expression of oncogenic K-ras. Genes Dev. 15, 3243–3248 (2001).
Luke, C. J. et al. An intracellular serpin regulates necrosis by inhibiting the induction and sequelae of lysosomal injury. Cell 130, 1108–1119 (2007).
Wang, S. & Kaufman, R. J. The impact of the unfolded protein response on human disease. J. Cell Biol. 197, 857–867 (2012).
Luo, B. & Lee, A. S. The critical roles of endoplasmic reticulum chaperones and unfolded protein response in tumorigenesis and anticancer therapies. Oncogene 32, 805–818 (2013).
De Raedt, T. et al. Exploiting cancer cell vulnerabilities to develop a combination therapy for ras-driven tumors. Cancer Cell 20, 400–413 (2011).
Terzic, J., Grivennikov, S., Karin, E. & Karin, M. Inflammation and colon cancer. Gastroenterology 138, 2101–2114 e2105 (2010).
Coussens, L. M. & Werb, Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature 420, 860–867 (2002).
Meylan, E. et al. Requirement for NF-kappaB signalling in a mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 462, 104–107 (2009).
Katagiri, C., Nakanishi, J., Kadoya, K. & Hibino, T. Serpin squamous cell carcinoma antigen inhibits UV-induced apoptosis via suppression of c-JUN NH2-terminal kinase. J. Cell Biol. 172, 983–990 (2006).
Vidalino, L. et al. SERPINB3, apoptosis and autoimmunity. Autoimmun. Rev. 9, 108–112 (2009).
Murakami, A. et al. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen suppresses radiation-induced cell death. Br. J. Cancer 84, 851–858 (2001).
Suminami, Y. et al. Suppression of a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)-related serpin, SCC antigen, inhibits tumor growth with increased intratumor infiltration of natural killer cells. Cancer Res. 61, 1776–1780 (2001).
Baron, J. A. et al. A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas. New Engl. J. Med. 348, 891–899 (2003).
Sandler, R. S. et al. A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas in patients with previous colorectal cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 348, 883–890 (2003).
Khosravi-Far, R. et al. Oncogenic Ras activation of Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase-independent pathways is sufficient to cause tumorigenic transformation. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 3923–3933 (1996).
Slack, J. K., Catling, A. D., Eblen, S. T., Weber, M. J. & Parsons, J. T. c-Raf-mediated inhibition of epidermal growth factor-stimulated cell migration. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27177–27184 (1999).
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs Alea Mills, Scott Lowe, Masashi Narita, Scott Eblen, Andrew Sharrocks and Erich Mackow for reagents and Drs Richard Lin and Dafna Bar-Sagi for critical reading. J.M.C. was supported by the NCI T32 training grant (T32CA009176). This work was supported by grants from NIH (R01CA129536 and R01GM97355 to W.-X.Z., U01CA168409 to R.S.P., and R01CA159222 and R01CA100126 to H.C.C.), and the Carol Baldwin Breast Cancer Research Foundation (to W.-X.Z.). P50CA095103 for the Vanderbilt University Medical Center GI Spore Tissue Core.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.M.C., N.S., J.-A.P., Y.S. and C.S. performed experiments. J.L. R.S.P., and H.C.C. aided with data analysis. J.M.C. and W.-X.Z. wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1-10 (PDF 1594 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Catanzaro, J., Sheshadri, N., Pan, JA. et al. Oncogenic Ras induces inflammatory cytokine production by upregulating the squamous cell carcinoma antigens SerpinB3/B4. Nat Commun 5, 3729 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4729
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4729
This article is cited by
-
Identification of genomic determinants contributing to cytokine release in immunotherapies and human diseases
Journal of Translational Medicine (2022)
-
Regulation of senescence traits by MAPKs
GeroScience (2020)
-
Expression of pro-angiogenic factors as potential biomarkers in experimental models of colon cancer
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (2020)
-
Do locally advanced and metastatic human epithelial cancers evolve in ‘placental/decidual-like microenvironments’?
Clinical and Translational Oncology (2019)
-
Switching off IMMP2L signaling drives senescence via simultaneous metabolic alteration and blockage of cell death
Cell Research (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.