Abstract
Förster resonance energy transfer (ET) between luminescent species is applied in bio-imaging, lighting and photovoltaics, and has an important role in photosynthesis. However, the fundamental question of whether ET rates and efficiencies can be tuned by the photonic environment remains under debate. Here we show that ET rates are independent of the photonic environment, using the model system of LaPO4 nanocrystals co-doped with Ce3+ donors and Tb3+ acceptors. Although the radiative emission rate of the Ce3+ excited state increases with the refractive index of the solvent in which the nanocrystals are dispersed, the Ce3+-to-Tb3+ ET rate does not. We demonstrate that, as a result, lower refractive index solvents enable higher ET efficiencies leading to higher Tb3+ emission intensities. Furthermore, an analytical model for ET in (nano)crystalline host materials is presented, able to predict the dependence of ET efficiencies on the photonic environment and the concentration of acceptor ions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Tuning of spontaneous emission by photonic crystals, plasmonic nanostructures or dielectric cavities, has been a field of intense research1,2,3,4. Key is control over the local density of optical states (LDOS), which is directly proportional to the radiative emission rate. On the other hand, there have been few reports about photonic effects on Förster resonance energy transfer (ET) between luminescent centres. This type of ET is important in photosynthesis5,6, as well as for the operation of devices such as fluorescent tubes and solid state lasers. It also lies at the core of emerging technologies such as background-free bio-imaging7,8, and spectral conversion for increased solar cell efficiencies9. Tunability of ET would allow for precise control over energy flow and spectral output of luminescent materials. Unfortunately, previous studies disagree on the most fundamental question of how ET rates scale with the LDOS. De Dood et al.10 and Blum et al.11 find that ET rates are independent of the LDOS, whereas other works claim a linear12,13, or even a quadratic14 dependence.
The contradictory findings reported thus far may in part result from the complexity of the experimental systems used. The decay dynamics of the donor were measured in layered structures with (varying) distance between donor–acceptor pairs and an interface. Some studies compared separately fabricated samples12,11, which is not ideal because reproducible control over the thickness and refractive index of the spacer layers can be difficult. In other cases, energy migration among donors and transfer to multiple acceptors10,12,13,14 would lead to non-exponential decay dynamics which are hard to interpret.
In this work we quantify the ET in co-doped LaPO4 nanocrystals (NCs), for different photonic environments and acceptor concentrations. Co-doped NCs are an ideal model system to study the influence of the LDOS on the ET rate. The crystallinity of the host material ensures that the donor–acceptor distances and the local electronic environment of the luminescent ions are well defined and fixed. At the same time, the photonic environment can be varied easily by dispersing the NCs in solvents with different refractive indices. A complicating factor is that random substitutional doping leads to an ensemble of donor ions with a different number of and separation from nearby acceptors. However, it is possible to accurately model the ET dynamics in a crystalline environment under the assumption of random donor and acceptor positions15,16.
We measure the decay dynamics of the Ce3+ excited state as a function of the concentration of Tb3+ acceptor ions, and with the NCs dispersed in various solvents. Using a simple comparative method, we find that the radiative emission rate of the Ce3+ excited state scales with the LDOS, whereas the Ce3+-to-Tb3+ ET rate is independent. This finding is confirmed by more detailed analysis of the experimental decay dynamics using a model of ET in NCs. We furthermore show that, consequently, the efficiency of ET is higher if the LDOS is lower. This effect results in a higher Tb3+ emission intensity if the NCs are dispersed in a solvent of lower refractive index. Our results demonstrate that the photonic environment can change the efficiency of ET, allowing for control over the energy flow and colour output of luminescent materials.
Results
Decay dynamics and emission spectra
Our model system is schematically depicted in Fig. 1a: LaPO4 NCs of 4 nm diameter doped with 1% Ce3+ (purple; donor ions), and with varying Tb3+ concentration (green; acceptor ions). Figure 1b presents the energy level diagram of the Ce3+–Tb3+ donor–acceptor pair17,18. After UV excitation of a Ce3+ ion to the 5d1 state (purple arrow), it can either decay radiatively (blue arrows), or resonantly transfer its energy to a nearby Tb3+ acceptor ion (green dashed arrow). Subsequently, Tb3+ emits a visible photon in the transition from the 5D4 metastable state to one of the sublevels of the spin-orbit split 7FJ ground state. This gives rise to an emission spectrum as shown in Fig. 1c, containing a Ce3+ emission band in the UV (300–360 nm) and several narrow emission lines in the visible (470–630 nm) from Tb3+. As shown in Fig. 1d,e for methanol, the NCs form a transparent dispersion in many polar solvents, which exhibits green luminescence under UV excitation.
Figure 2a shows photoluminescence (PL) decay curves of the Ce3+ emission for LaPO4:Ce3+(1%) NCs dispersed in different solvents. The decay dynamics are single-exponential and are faster in solvents with a higher refractive index, reflecting that the radiative emission rate scales with the LDOS. The PL decay curves for LaPO4:Ce3+(1%)Tb3+(20%) NCs are shown in Fig. 2b. They are non-exponential, as different Ce3+ centres in the ensemble have different ET rates determined by the number and proximity of neighbouring Tb3+ acceptors. Nevertheless, the trend of faster decay for higher refractive index is still visible.
The PL decay curves in Fig. 2a,b can be used as direct proof that ET rates are independent of the LDOS. The donors in the ensemble have equal radiative emission rates γrad but differ in ET rate. Hence, the decay dynamics of the ensemble can be factorized as
where I(t) is the emission intensity at delay time t after an excitation pulse. The factor T(t) describes the decay due to ET, which is in general non-exponential. If we divide the non-exponential PL decay curve of Fig. 2b by the exponential decay dynamics as measured in the absence of Tb3+ acceptors (Fig. 2a), we directly obtain the contribution of ET T(t). We plot T(t) in Fig. 2c for the different solvents. The trend of faster decay with increasing refractive index, which was visible in Fig. 2a,b, is no longer present. From this simple analysis we can already conclude that the trend observed in Fig. 2b is solely due to a dependence of the radiative emission rate on the LDOS, while the ET rate is independent.
If indeed radiative decay and ET rates scale differently with the LDOS, then the ET efficiency should be tunable by the refractive index of the solvent11. More precisely, Ce3+-to-Tb3+ ET becomes more efficient when competing radiative decay of the Ce3+ excited state is suppressed. Hence, the Tb3+ intensity should increase when we reduce the solvent refractive index. This is exactly what we observe. Figure 2d shows the emission spectra of LaPO4:Ce3+(1%)Tb3+(2%) NCs dispersed in different solvents. Upon going from dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO; refractive index n=1.51) to methanol (n=1.36), the relative Tb3+ intensity increases by 19% (Fig. 2e).
Modelling energy transfer in nanocrystals
We now present an analytical model that reproduces how the decay dynamics of LaPO4:Ce3+(1%)Tb3+(x%) NCs depend on x, and can be used to predict ET efficiencies in different photonic environments. For an isolated donor–acceptor pair at separation r having dipole–dipole interaction, the ET rate is γET=c/r6 (ref. 19) with c the ‘ET strength’. The total decay rate Γ of a particular donor depends on the proximity of acceptors:
where the summation runs over all (nearby) acceptors, and ri is the distance to acceptor i. In a crystal, only discrete donor–acceptor distances are possible, determined by the crystal lattice. For example, around the central donor ion in the schematic crystal of Fig. 3a, there is a ‘shell’ with n1=2 cation sites at distance r1 (squares), one with n2=4 cation sites at distance r2 (disks), and so on. Previously, our group has used this ‘shell model’ to simulate ET dynamics in a co-doped bulk crystal15,16. In the Methods section we show that under the assumption of a random distribution of donor and acceptor ions, the PL decay trace of an ensemble of donors in a bulk crystal can be written as:
Here, the product runs over all shells, and x͛[0,1] is the acceptor concentration.
The finite size of our NCs requires an adjustment to equation 3. As plotted in Fig. 3b, a donor ion close to the NC surface has fewer nearby cation sites than a donor ion in the centre. To account for these finite-size effects we consider the different possible donor positions in the NCs. For each position, we introduce a geometrical factor fi depending on the proximity of the NC surface: ni→fini (see Methods).
Figure 3c,d shows the PL decay curves for LaPO4:Ce3+(1%)Tb3+(x%) NCs with increasing x, in (c) methanol (n=1.36) and (d) DMSO (n=1.51). Supplementary Fig. 1 shows the decay dynamics in other solvents. Solid black lines are a global fit of the data for a specific solvent to our ET formula (equation 3), accounting for the finite size of a spherical NC with 4 nm diameter. Our model captures how the decay dynamics become faster and more non-exponential as the Tb3+ concentration increases. Supplementary Fig. 2 demonstrates that neglecting finite-size effects leads to poor fits, especially at high acceptor concentrations.
These fits to the decay dynamics allow us to extract the dependence of the ET strength c on the LDOS. They further confirm that γrad scales with the solvent refractive index as expected (see Supplementary Fig. 3; in a separate publication we will discuss in more detail the effect of the solvent refractive index on the radiative decay of doped NCs20). In Fig. 3e we plot the ET strength c against the LDOS (which scales linearly with γrad). Each data point corresponds to a different solvent, and depicts results of a global fit as in Fig. 3c,d. Solid lines give the trends expected for the three possibilities for the power p of the LDOS dependence of ET rates12,13,14. The fitted values of c are roughly constant with changing LDOS, at 0.405±0.021 nm6 μs−1. The linear or quadratic trends expected for p=1 (blue line) or p=2 (purple line) are absent. Hence, these fit results confirm our conclusion from Fig. 2 that ET rates are independent of the LDOS. As an alternative visualization, in Fig. 2f we plot the critical ET distance R0 versus γrad11. By definition R0=(c/γrad)1/6 is the donor–acceptor separation at which there is 50% probability of ET. We see that R0 becomes smaller with increasing LDOS, in agreement with the trend expected for p=0 (green line).
Discussion
With the fitted values of the (variable) radiative rate and the constant ET strength, we can use our analytical model to calculate the Ce3+-to-Tb3+ ET efficiency ηET for NCs embedded in different photonic environments21:
where again accounting for finite-size effects is needed in a nanocrystalline host. Figure 2e shows that equation 4 reproduces the observed increase of the Tb3+ emission intensity in solvents of decreasing refractive index.
Finally, using our model and our finding that the ET strength is a constant, we can predict ET efficiencies in more complex photonic environments than a homogeneous dielectric. For example, a photonic crystal structure inhibiting radiative decay by a factor 10 (ref. 4) can be used to increase the ET efficiency in LaPO4:Ce3+(1%)Tb3+(2%) NCs to 30% (now, 11–13% depending on the solvent). Conversely, co-doped NCs could be used as local probes for the LDOS in photonic structures, where the relative emission intensities of the dopants reveal the LDOS-dependent ET efficiency between them.
Our results demonstrate that photonic structures developed for spontaneous emission control can have an important role in tuning the efficiency of ET. The concept of ET from sensitizers such as colloidal semiconductor quantum dots22,23,24, dye molecules25,26,27,28 or silicon NCs29,30,31 is widely used. It can, for example, improve the spectral response of photovoltaic devices, increase the output of phosphors or optical amplifiers or be used for colour tuning in lighting. Furthermore, ET has a crucial role in photon upconversion28,32,33 used in bio-imaging and for next-generation photovoltaics. We envision that these and other applications can benefit from photonic enhancements of the ET efficiency.
Methods
Synthesis and characterization
We synthesized LaPO4 NCs co-doped with Ce3+ and Tb3+ using the method of Oertel et al.17. Briefly, a clear solution of 10 mmol of lanthanide chlorides (La, Ce, Tb) in 10 ml of methanol was mixed with 40 mmol of diethyl ethylphosphonate. Methanol was evaporated under vacuum at room temperature, after which 30 ml of diphenyl ether was added. Following the removal of water under vacuum at 105 °C, we added 40 mmol of tributylamine and 7 ml of a 2 M solution of phosphoric acid in dihexyl ether. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was kept overnight under nitrogen at 200 °C, during which the NCs were formed. They were isolated by centrifugation, washed with toluene and dried under vacuum. From transmission electron microscopy (Supplementary Fig. 4a), we know that the NCs have a diameter of 4 nm and a polydispersity of 10%. Powder X-ray diffraction (Supplementary Fig. 4b) confirms that the NCs exhibit the monazite crystal structure of LaPO4 up to the highest doping concentration of 40% Tb3+. The doping concentrations of 1% Ce3+, and a varying concentration (0, 2, 5, 10, 20, 40%) of Tb3+ were confirmed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy.
Experimental details
Photoluminescence measurements were performed using an Edinburgh Instruments FLS920 fluorescence spectrometer. For recording emission spectra we used a 450 W Xe lamp as excitation source and a Hamamatsu R928 PMT with a grating blazed at 300 nm for detection. For PL decay measurements, we used a PicoQuant PDL 800-B+PLS 8-2-409 pulsed diode laser emitting at 270 nm with a repetition rate of 2.5 MHz, and a Hamamatsu H74220-60 PMT with a grating blazed at 300 nm. To obtain the refractive index in the UV of the different solvents, we used a home-built setup to measure the critical angle of total internal reflection of a UV laser beam (Kimmon He/Cd IK3151R-E; λ=325 nm) on the glass/solvent interface. We found refractive indices of 1.36 for methanol, 1.40 for ethanol, 1.42 for 1-propanol, 1.43 for 1-butanol, 1.44 for 1-pentanol, 1.45 for 1-hexanol, 1.46 for 1-octanol and 1.51 for DMSO.
Modelling the ET dynamics
We consider an excited donor ion in a crystalline environment with acceptors randomly substituted, as expected in LaPO4:Ce3+, Tb3+ from the chemical similarity of ions in the lanthanide series. Each nearby cation site has an independent probability x (the overall acceptor concentration) to contain an acceptor ion, hence add to the decay rate or, equivalently, a factor to the decay trace of the donor (with rj the separation from the donor). The decay trace of the ensemble of donors contains contributions from all possible donor environments:
where the product runs over all (nearby) cation sites, and each factor accounts for a probability x that cation site j adds a decay component and a probability 1−x that it does not. Using the crystalline nature of the host we can write the above equation in terms of shells (see Fig. 3a)16, leading to equation 3. As the ET rate rapidly decreases with increasing donor–acceptor separation (as r−6), we capture more than 99.5% of the ET when taking into account only the first 378 cation sites within 1.9 nm from the donor. We neglect the possibility of donor-to-donor energy migration, justified by the low donor concentration of 1%. This effect, however, may explain small deviations between the experimental decay dynamics and our model.
Accounting for the finite size of a nanocrystal
As depicted in Fig. 3b, donors close to the NC surface have a different crystalline environment than those near the centre. Assuming spherical NCs, we multiply the exponents ni in equation 3 by a geometrical factor
where h is the radial coordinate of the donor ion and a is the NC radius. We take into account the possible donor positions in a spherical NC by summation of equation 3 over different values of h with h3 evenly distributed over the interval [0, a3]. We must, however, note that the actual NCs are not perfectly spherical and exhibit a 10% size distribution. We have checked that, while the precise values fitted for c and R0 are affected, the trends visible in Fig. 3e,f are robust to neglecting these geometrical details in the averaging procedure. For each solvent we determine the radiative decay rate γrad from a maximum likelihood fit34 of a single exponential to the data for LaPO4:Ce3+(1%) NCs. Subsequently, we fix γrad in a global weighted least squares fit of equation 3 (with account for the different donor positions in an NC) to the data for the LaPO4:Ce3+(1%)Tb3+(x%) NCs.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Rabouw, F. T. et al. Photonic effects on the Förster resonance energy transfer efficiency. Nat. Commun. 5:3610 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4610 (2014).
References
Noda, S., Fujita, M. & Asano, T. Spontaneous-emission control by photonic crystals and nanocavities. Nature Photon. 1, 449–458 (2007).
Curto, A. G. et al. Unidirectional emission of a quantum dot coupled to a nanoantenna. Science 329, 930–933 (2010).
Novotny, L. & Van Hulst, N. Antennas for light. Nature Photon. 5, 83–90 (2011).
Leistikow, M. D. et al. Inhibited spontaneous emission of quantum dots observed in a 3D photonic band gap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 193903 (2011).
Cheng, Y.-C. & Fleming, G. R. Dynamics of light harvesting in photosynthesis. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 60, 241–262 (2009).
Scholes, G. D., Fleming, G. R., Olaya-Castro, A. & Van Grondelle, R. Lessons from nature about solar light harvesting. Nat. Chem. 3, 763–774 (2011).
Chatterjee, D. K., Rufaihah, A. J. & Zhang, Y. Upconversion fluorescence imaging of cells and small animals using lanthanide doped nanocrystals. Biomaterials 29, 937–943 (2008).
Zhou, J., Zhuang, L. & Li, F. Upconversion nanophosphors for small-animal imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 1323–1349 (2012).
Van der Ende, B. M., Aarts, L. & Meijerink, A. Lanthanide ions as spectral converters for solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 11081–11095 (2009).
De Dood, M. J. A., Knoester, J., Tip, A. & Polman, A. Förster transfer and the local optical density of states in erbium-doped silica. Phys. Rev. B 71, 115102 (2005).
Blum, C. et al. Nanophotonic control of the Förster resonance energy transfer efficiency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203601 (2012).
Andrew, P. & Barnes, W. L. Förster energy transfer in an optical microcavity. Science 290, 785–788 (2000).
Nakamura, T., Fujii, M., Imakita, K. & Hayashi, S. Modification of energy transfer from Si nanocrystals to Er3+ near a Au thin film. Phys. Rev. B 72, 235412 (2005).
Nakamura, T., Fujii, M., Miura, S., Inui, M. & Hayashi, S. Enhancement and suppression of energy transfer from Si nanocrystals to Er ions through a control of the photonic mode density. Phys. Rev. B 74, 045302 (2006).
Vergeer, P. et al. Quantum cutting by cooperative energy transfer in YbxY1−xPO4:Tb3+. Phys. Rev. B 71, 014119 (2005).
Van Wijngaarden, T., Scheidelaar, S., Vlugt, T. J. H., Reid, M. F. & Meijerink, A. Energy transfer mechanism for downconversion in the (Pr3+, Yb3+) couple. Phys. Rev. B 81, 155112 (2010).
Oertel, A., Lengler, C., Walther, T. & Haase, M. Photonic properties of inverse opals fabricated from lanthanide-doped LaPO4 nanocrystals. Chem. Mater. 21, 3883–3888 (2009).
Wilson, P. R. J. et al. XANES and XEOL investigation of cerium and terbium co-doped silicon oxide films. ECS Trans. 45, 43–48 (2012).
Förster, T. Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenz. Ann. Phys. 437, 55–75 (1948).
Duan, C.-K., Reid, M. F. & Wang, Z. Local field effects on the radiative lifetime of emitters in surrounding media: virtual- or real-cavity model? Phys. Lett. A 343, 474–480 (2005).
Van Driel, A. F. et al. Statistical analysis of time-resolved emission from ensembles of semiconductor quantum dots: Interpretation of exponential decay models. Phys. Rev. B 75, 035329 (2007).
Bakalova, R., Ohba, H., Zhelev, Z., Ishikawa, M. & Baba, Y. Quantum dots as photosensitizers? Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1360–1361 (2004).
Li, Y., Rizzo, A., Cingolani, R. & Gigli, G. Bright white-light-emitting device from ternary nanocrystal composites. Adv. Mater. 18, 2545–2548 (2006).
Buhbut, S. et al. Built-in quantum dot antennas in dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano 4, 1293–1298 (2010).
Hardin, B. E. et al. Increased light harvesting in dye-sensitized solar cells with energy relay dyes. Nature Photon. 3, 406–411 (2009).
Mor, G. K. et al. High-efficiency Förster resonance energy transfer in solid-state dye sensitized solar cells. Nano. Lett. 10, 2387–2394 (2010).
Kang, B.-H. et al. Highly efficient hybrid light-emitting device using complex of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots embedded in co-polymer as an active layer. Opt. Expr. 18, 18303–18311 (2010).
Zou, W., Visser, C., Maduro, J. A., Pshenichnikov, M. S. & Hummelen, J. C. Broadband dye-sensitized upconversion of near-infrared light. Nature Photon. 6, 560–563 (2012).
Navarro-Urrios, D. et al. Energy transfer between amorphous Si nanoclusters and Er3+ ions in a SiO2 matrix. Phys. Rev. B 79, 193312 (2009).
Timmerman, D., Saeed, S., Gregorkiewicz, T., Roldán Gutiérrez, M. A. & Molina, S. A. Investigation of saturation and excitation behavior of 1.5 μm emission from Er3+ ions in SiO2 sensitized with Si nanocrystals. Phys. Status Solidi C 9, 2312–2317 (2012).
Podhorodecki, A. et al. On the origin of emission and thermal quenching of SRSO:Er3+ films grown by ECR-PECVD. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8, 98 (2013).
Wang, F. et al. Tuning upconversion through energy migration in core-shell nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 10, 968–973 (2010).
Zhao, J. et al. Single-nanocrystal sensitivity achieved by enhanced upconversion luminescence. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 729–734 (2013).
Bajzer, Z., Therneau, T. M., Sharp, J. C. & Prendergast, F. G. Maximum likelihood method for the analysis of time-resolved fluorescence decay curves. Eur. Biophys. J. 20, 247–262 (1991).
Acknowledgements
We thank Henkjan Siekman and Peter de Graaf for fabricating the quartz setup to measure solvent refractive indices in the UV. This work is part of the research programme of the ‘Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM)’, which is financially supported by the ‘Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO)’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.T.R. and A.M. conceived the experiment. S.A.d.H. and T.S. performed the NC synthesis and the PL experiments. F.T.R. performed the data analysis. F.T.R. and A.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation and discussion of the results.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1-4 (PDF 486 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rabouw, F., den Hartog, S., Senden, T. et al. Photonic effects on the Förster resonance energy transfer efficiency. Nat Commun 5, 3610 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4610
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4610
This article is cited by
-
Experimental evidence of Förster energy transfer enhancement in the near field through engineered metamaterial surface waves
Communications Physics (2023)
-
Full shell coating or cation exchange enhances luminescence
Nature Communications (2021)
-
A luminescent view of the clickable assembly of LnF3 nanoclusters
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Efficient energy transfer mitigates parasitic light absorption in molecular charge-extraction layers for perovskite solar cells
Nature Communications (2020)
-
Understanding and tuning blue-to-near-infrared photon cutting by the Tm3+/Yb3+ couple
Light: Science & Applications (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.