Abstract
Removal of corn residue for biofuels can decrease soil organic carbon (SOC; refs 1, 2) and increase CO2 emissions3 because residue C in biofuels is oxidized to CO2 at a faster rate than when added to soil4,5. Net CO2 emissions from residue removal are not adequately characterized in biofuel life cycle assessment (LCA; refs 6, 7, 8). Here we used a model to estimate CO2 emissions from corn residue removal across the US Corn Belt at 580 million geospatial cells. To test the SOC model9,10,11, we compared estimated daily CO2 emissions from corn residue and soil with CO2 emissions measured using eddy covariance12,13,14, with 12% average error over nine years. The model estimated residue removal of 6 Mg per ha−1 yr−1 over five to ten years could decrease regional net SOC by an average of 0.47–0.66 Mg C ha−1 yr−1. These emissions add an average of 50–70 g CO2 per megajoule of biofuel (range 30–90) and are insensitive to the fraction of residue removed. Unless lost C is replaced15,16, life cycle emissions will probably exceed the US legislative mandate of 60% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared with gasoline.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilhelm, W. W., Johnson, J. M. F., Karlen, D. L. & Lightle, D. T. Corn stover to sustain soil organic carbon further constrains biomass supply. Agronomy J. 99, 1665–1667 (2007).
Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., Davis, S. C., Masters, M. D. & DeLucia, E. H. Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops. GCB Bioenergy 1, 75–96 (2009).
Kochsiek, A. E. & Knops, M. H. Maize cellulosic biofuels: Soil carbon loss can be a hidden cost of residue removal. GCB Bioenergy 4, 299–233 (2012).
Kutsch, W. L., Bahn, M. & Heinemeyer, A. Soil Carbon Dynamics: An Integrated Methodology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).
Conant, R. T. et al. Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates–Synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3392–3404 (2011).
Sheehan, J. et al. Energy and environmental aspects of using corn stover for fuel ethanol. J. Indust. Ecol. 7, 117–146 (2004).
Spatari, S. & MacLean, H. L. Characterizing model uncertainties in the life cycle of lignocellulose-based ethanol fuels. Environ. Sci. Tech. 44, 8773–8780 (2010).
Liska, A.J. in Sustainable Biofuels: An Ecological Assessment of Future Energy (eds Bhardwaj A. K., Zenone T. & Chen J. K.) (Walter De Gruyter, in the press)
Yang, H. S. & Janssen, B. H. A mono-component model of carbon mineralization with a dynamic rate constant. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51, 517–529 (2000).
Yang, H. S. & Janssen, B. H. Relationship between substrate initial reactivity and residues ageing speed in carbon mineralization. Plant Soil 239, 215–224 (2002).
Vleeshouwers, L. M. & Verhagen, A. Carbon emission and sequestration by agricultural land use: A model study for Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 8, 519–530 (2002).
Verma, S. B. et al. Annual carbon dioxide exchange in irrigated and rainfed maize-based agroecosystems. Agr. For. Metereol. 131, 77–96 (2005).
Suyker, A. E. & Verma, S. B. Coupling of carbon dioxide and water vapor exchanges of irrigated and rainfed maize–soybean cropping systems and water productivity. Agr. For. Metereol. 150, 553–563 (2010).
Kochsiek, A. E., Knops, J. M. H., Brassil, C. E. & Arkebauer, T. J. Maize and soybean litter-carbon pool dynamics in three no-till systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 77, 226–236 (2012).
Fronning, B. E, Thelen, K. D & Min, D. Use of manure, compost, and cover crops to supplant crop residue carbon in corn stover removed cropping systems. Agronomy J. 100, 1703–1710 (2008).
Blanco-Canqui, H. Crop residue removal for bioenergy reduces soil carbon pools: How can we offset carbon losses? BioEnergy Res. 6, 358–371 (2013).
Panoutsou, C., Bauen, A. & Duffield, J. Policy regimes and funding schemes to support investment for next-generation biofuels in the USA and the EU-27. Biofuel Bioprod. Bioref. 7, 685–701 (2013).
Solomon, B. D., Barnes, J. R. & Halvorsen, K. E. Grain and cellulosic ethanol: History, economics, and energy policy. Biomass Bioenergy 31, 416–425 (2007).
Brown, T. R. & Brown, R. C. A review of cellulosic biofuel commercial-scale projects in the United States. Biofuel Bioprod. Bioref. 7, 235–245 (2013).
Cherubini, F. & Strømman, A. H. Production of biofuels and biochemicals from lignocellulosic biomass: Estimation of maximum theoretical yields and efficiencies using matrix algebra. Energy Fuel 24, 2657–2666 (2010).
Kim, S., Dale, B. E. & Jenkins, R. Life cycle assessment of corn grain and corn stover in the United States. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 14, 160–174 (2009).
Gramig, B. M., Reeling, C. J., Cibin, R. & Chaubey, I. Environmental and economic trade-offs in a watershed when using corn stover for bioenergy. Envir. Sci. Tech. 47, 1784–1791 (2013).
Liska, A. J. & Perrin, R. K. Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: Regulations versus science. Biofuel Bioprod. Bioref. 3, 318–328 (2009).
Cherubini, F. & Ulgiati, S. Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems—A LCA case study. Appl. Energy 87, 47–57 (2010).
Wortmann, C. S. et al. Dryland performance of sweet sorghum and grain crops for biofuel in Nebraska. Agronomy J. 102, 319–326 (2010).
Hudiburg, T. W., Law, B. E., Wirth, C. & Luyssaert, S. Regional carbon dioxide implications of forest bioenergy production. Nature Clim. Change 1, 419–423 (2011).
National Resources Conservation Service, National Resources Inventory, 2007 Annual NRI, Soil Erosion on Cropland. (US Department of Agriculture, 2010).
Clapp, C. E., Allmaras, R. R., Layese, M. F., Linden, D. R. & Dowdy, R. H. Soil organic carbon and 13C abundance as related to tillage, crop residue and nitrogen fertilization under continuous corn management in Minnesota. Soil Till. Res. 55, 127–142 (2000).
Karlen, D. L et al. Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn. Soil Till. Res. 31, 149–167 (1994).
Falloon, P. & Smith, P. in Soil Carbon Dynamics: An Integrated Methodology (eds Kutsch, W. L., Bahn, M. & Heinemeyer, A.) 221–244 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).
Smith, W. N. et al. Crop residue removal effects on soil carbon: Measured and inter-model comparisons. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 161, 27–38 (2012).
Biscoe, P. V., Scott, R. K. & Monteith, J. L. Barley and its environment. III. Carbon budget of the stand. J. Appl. Ecol. 12, 269–293 (1975).
Johnson, J. M. F., Allmaras, R. R. & Reicosky, D. C. Estimating source carbon from crop residues, roots and rhizodeposits using the national grain-yield database. Agronomy. J. 98, 622–636 (2006).
Kazi, F. K. et al. Techno-economic comparison of process technologies for biochemical ethanol production from corn stover. Fuel 89, S20–S28 (2010).
Searchinger, T. et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319, 1238–1240 (2008).
Liska, A. J. & Heier, C.D. The limits to complexity: A thermodynamic history of bioenergy. Biofuel Bioprod. Bioref. 7, 573–581 (2013).
Blanco-Canqui, H. Energy crops and their implications on soil and environment. Agronomy. J. 102, 403–419 (2010).
Tilman, D. et al. Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325, 270–271 (2009).
Smith, P. et al. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Glob. Change Biol. 19, 2285–2302 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the US Department of Energy (DE-EE0003149) and the Agricultural Research Division of the University of Nebraska and made use of the Holland Computing Center of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.J.L., H.Y., M.M. and S.G. designed the research; A.J.L., H.Y., M.M., S.G. H.Z., M.P.P., X.X.F. and A.E.S. performed the research; A.J.L., H.Y., M.M., S.G., H.Z., M.P.P., X.X.F. and A.E.S. analyzed the data; and A.J.L., H.Y., M.M., H.B.-C., and A.E.S. wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liska, A., Yang, H., Milner, M. et al. Biofuels from crop residue can reduce soil carbon and increase CO2 emissions. Nature Clim Change 4, 398–401 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2187
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2187
This article is cited by
-
Life cycle assessment of bio-based fertilizers production systems: where are we and where should we be heading?
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (2023)
-
Environmental and energy implications of coal-based alternative vehicle fuel pathway from the life cycle perspective
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2022)
-
Environmental, social, and economic assessment of energy utilization of crop residue in China
Frontiers in Energy (2021)
-
Assessment of Bioenergy Generation Potential of Agricultural Crop Residues in India
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2021)
-
Biomass residues as twenty-first century bioenergy feedstock—a comparison of eight integrated assessment models
Climatic Change (2020)