Abstract
Action on mitigating climate change seems to be grinding to a halt within the global political arena. Major emitters seem unwilling to accept binding emissions reductions targets as their economies have stagnated. The talks at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change conference in Copenhagen in 2009 were meant to represent a watershed moment for global cooperation on climate change1 but produced little more than a symbolic accord2. Fast forward another three years and the outcomes of the Doha negotiations3,4,5 deferred the key decisions on climate change mitigation to 2015, as the Durban Platform did before6. Is this neglect justified? Here we use the PAGE09 integrated assessment model7 to estimate the mean social cost of CO2 for a wide range of economic growth scenarios. The social cost of CO2 measures the net present value of the extra damage caused by the emission of one more tonne of CO2 today. The results show that in a world with sustained lower economic growth the mean social cost of CO2 increases because the climate impacts occur in a relatively poor world, suggesting that, if anything, mitigating climate change should be a higher priority for policymakers in a low-growth world.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: ‘Fourteen Days to Seal History’s Judgment on this generation’ The Guardian (7 December 2009); available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/06/copenhagen-editorial.
Report of The Conference of the Parties on its Fifteenth Session (UNFCCC, 2010); available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf.
Morgan, J. Reflections On COP 18 In Doha: Negotiators Made Only Incremental Progress World Resources Institute Insights (14 December 2012); available at http://insights.wri.org/news/2012/12/reflections-cop-18-doha-negotiators-made-only-incremental-progress.
Beyer, J. Doha: It Kept the Show on the Road–But only Just (Carbon Trust, 2012); available at http://www.carbontrust.com/news/2013/01/doha-it-kept-the-show-on-the-road-but-only-just.
Jacobs, M. The Doha Climate Talks were a start, but 2015 will be the moment of truth. The Guardian (10 December 2012); available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/10/doha-climate-talks-global-warming.
Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventeenth Session (UNFCCC, 2012); available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdf.
Hope, C. Judge Business School Working Paper 4/2011 (Judge Business School, 2011); available at http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/research/working_papers/2011/wp1104.pdf.
Nakicenovic, N. & Swart, R. (eds) IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
Hope, C. Judge Business School Working Paper 5/2011 (Judge Business School, 2011); available at http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/research/working_papers/2011/wp1105.pdf.
Economic Outlook 2011/2012 (OECD, 2011); available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/23/49113623.pdf.
Bivens, J., Fieldhouse, A. & Shierholz, H. From Free Fall to Stagnation Briefing Paper 355 (Economic Policy Institute, 2013); available at http://www.epi.org/publication/bp355-five-years-after-start-of-great-recession.
Obama, B. Remarks by the President at Secretary Ban Ki Moon’s Climate Change Summit (White House, 2009); available athttp://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-UN-Secretary-General-Ban-Ki-moons-Climate-Change-Summit.
Osborne, G. Speech—Together We Will Ride Out the Storm (The Conservative Party, 2011); available at http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2011/10/Osborne_together_we_will_ride_out_the_storm.aspx.
Public Opinion in the European Union Vol. 77 (Eurobarometer, 2012).
Leiserowitz et al. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication (Yale University & George Mason University, 2011); available at http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/ClimateBeliefsMay2011.pdf.
Ding, D. et al. Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Clim. Change 1, 462–466 (2011).
Public Priorities: Deficit Rising, Terrorism Slipping (Pew Research Center, 2011); available at http://www.people-press.org/2012/01/23/public-priorities-deficit-rising-terrorism-slipping/?src=prc-headline.
Global Economic Prospects: Uncertainties and Vulnerabilities (World Bank, 2012); available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/334934-1322593305595/8287139-1326374900917/GEP_January_2012a_FullReport_FINAL.pdf.
World Economic Outlook (International Monetary Fund, 2011); available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2011/02/pdf/text.pdf.
StatExtracts. Accessed February 2012 (OECD, 2012); available at http://stats.oecd.org/.
Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
The Economics of Climate Change in Southeast Asia: A Regional Review (Asian Development Bank, 2009).
Eliasch, J. Climate Change: Financing Global Forests (Office of Climate Change, 2008).
IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Hope, C. Critical issues for the calculation of the social cost of CO2: Why the estimates from PAGE09 are higher than those from PAGE2002. Climatic Change 117, 531–543 (2013).
Weitzman, M. On modelling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev. Econ. Stat. 91, 1–19 (2009).
Acknowledgements
Development of the PAGE09 model received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme, as part of the Climate Cost Project (Full Costs of Climate Change, Grant Agreement 212774) http://www.climatecost.eu and from the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.H. and M.H. conceived the study, designed the experiments and wrote the paper. C.H. performed the experiments and analysed the results.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hope, C., Hope, M. The social cost of CO2 in a low-growth world. Nature Clim Change 3, 722–724 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1935
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1935
This article is cited by
-
Evaluating process-based integrated assessment models of climate change mitigation
Climatic Change (2021)
-
Protecting tropical forests from the rapid expansion of rubber using carbon payments
Nature Communications (2018)