Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The social cost of CO2 in a low-growth world

Abstract

Action on mitigating climate change seems to be grinding to a halt within the global political arena. Major emitters seem unwilling to accept binding emissions reductions targets as their economies have stagnated. The talks at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change conference in Copenhagen in 2009 were meant to represent a watershed moment for global cooperation on climate change1 but produced little more than a symbolic accord2. Fast forward another three years and the outcomes of the Doha negotiations3,4,5 deferred the key decisions on climate change mitigation to 2015, as the Durban Platform did before6. Is this neglect justified? Here we use the PAGE09 integrated assessment model7 to estimate the mean social cost of CO2 for a wide range of economic growth scenarios. The social cost of CO2 measures the net present value of the extra damage caused by the emission of one more tonne of CO2 today. The results show that in a world with sustained lower economic growth the mean social cost of CO2 increases because the climate impacts occur in a relatively poor world, suggesting that, if anything, mitigating climate change should be a higher priority for policymakers in a low-growth world.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The mean SCCO2 by GDP growth rate in annex 1 countries.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: ‘Fourteen Days to Seal History’s Judgment on this generation’ The Guardian (7 December 2009); available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/06/copenhagen-editorial.

  2. Report of The Conference of the Parties on its Fifteenth Session (UNFCCC, 2010); available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf.

  3. Morgan, J. Reflections On COP 18 In Doha: Negotiators Made Only Incremental Progress World Resources Institute Insights (14 December 2012); available at http://insights.wri.org/news/2012/12/reflections-cop-18-doha-negotiators-made-only-incremental-progress.

  4. Beyer, J. Doha: It Kept the Show on the Road–But only Just (Carbon Trust, 2012); available at http://www.carbontrust.com/news/2013/01/doha-it-kept-the-show-on-the-road-but-only-just.

  5. Jacobs, M. The Doha Climate Talks were a start, but 2015 will be the moment of truth. The Guardian (10 December 2012); available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/10/doha-climate-talks-global-warming.

  6. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventeenth Session (UNFCCC, 2012); available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdf.

  7. Hope, C. Judge Business School Working Paper 4/2011 (Judge Business School, 2011); available at http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/research/working_papers/2011/wp1104.pdf.

  8. Nakicenovic, N. & Swart, R. (eds) IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  9. Hope, C. Judge Business School Working Paper 5/2011 (Judge Business School, 2011); available at http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/research/working_papers/2011/wp1105.pdf.

  10. Economic Outlook 2011/2012 (OECD, 2011); available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/23/49113623.pdf.

  11. Bivens, J., Fieldhouse, A. & Shierholz, H. From Free Fall to Stagnation Briefing Paper 355 (Economic Policy Institute, 2013); available at http://www.epi.org/publication/bp355-five-years-after-start-of-great-recession.

  12. Obama, B. Remarks by the President at Secretary Ban Ki Moon’s Climate Change Summit (White House, 2009); available athttp://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-UN-Secretary-General-Ban-Ki-moons-Climate-Change-Summit.

  13. Osborne, G. Speech—Together We Will Ride Out the Storm (The Conservative Party, 2011); available at http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2011/10/Osborne_together_we_will_ride_out_the_storm.aspx.

  14. Public Opinion in the European Union Vol. 77 (Eurobarometer, 2012).

  15. Leiserowitz et al. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication (Yale University & George Mason University, 2011); available at http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/ClimateBeliefsMay2011.pdf.

  16. Ding, D. et al. Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Clim. Change 1, 462–466 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Public Priorities: Deficit Rising, Terrorism Slipping (Pew Research Center, 2011); available at http://www.people-press.org/2012/01/23/public-priorities-deficit-rising-terrorism-slipping/?src=prc-headline.

  18. Global Economic Prospects: Uncertainties and Vulnerabilities (World Bank, 2012); available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/334934-1322593305595/8287139-1326374900917/GEP_January_2012a_FullReport_FINAL.pdf.

  19. World Economic Outlook (International Monetary Fund, 2011); available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2011/02/pdf/text.pdf.

  20. StatExtracts. Accessed February 2012 (OECD, 2012); available at http://stats.oecd.org/.

  21. Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. The Economics of Climate Change in Southeast Asia: A Regional Review (Asian Development Bank, 2009).

  23. Eliasch, J. Climate Change: Financing Global Forests (Office of Climate Change, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  24. IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  25. Hope, C. Critical issues for the calculation of the social cost of CO2: Why the estimates from PAGE09 are higher than those from PAGE2002. Climatic Change 117, 531–543 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weitzman, M. On modelling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev. Econ. Stat. 91, 1–19 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Development of the PAGE09 model received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme, as part of the Climate Cost Project (Full Costs of Climate Change, Grant Agreement 212774) http://www.climatecost.eu and from the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.H. and M.H. conceived the study, designed the experiments and wrote the paper. C.H. performed the experiments and analysed the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Hope.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hope, C., Hope, M. The social cost of CO2 in a low-growth world. Nature Clim Change 3, 722–724 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1935

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1935

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing