Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Patterns in household-level engagement with climate change in Indonesia

Abstract

Understanding how individuals engage with climate change is critical for developing successful climate adaptation policies1. Indonesia ranks among the world’s top CO2 emitters2, affirming its relevance to the global climate change policy arena, yet the dynamics of climate change engagement in Indonesia may differ from developed countries from which much research on this issue derives3. We surveyed 6,310 households in two Indonesian regions to investigate patterns in four steps of engagement: observation, risk perception, reactive action (in response to present climate change) and proactive action (in anticipation of future climate change). We show that 89.5% of households exhibited a pattern whereby taking each of these steps in sequence implied taking all steps that precede it. Exceptions occurred in urban areas, where households were more likely to take action without having observed climate change or perceiving risks. In rural areas, households were more likely to observe climate change without taking action. These variations suggest a potentially nonlinear relationship between steps of engagement. We distinguish three types of household requiring adaptation support, and stress that Indonesian climate policy should shift emphasis from raising awareness to identifying broader institutional structures and processes to facilitate household engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Number of respondents exhibiting the sequential pattern described in the paper, that is, respondents giving a positive response to this question who gave positive responses to all previous questions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. & Whitmarsh, L. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob. Environ. Change 17, 445–459 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cronin, T. & Santoso, L. REDD+ Politics in the Media: A Case Study from Indonesia Working Paper 49 (CIFOR, 2010).

  3. Wolf, J. & Moser, S. C. Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: Insights from in-depth studies across the world. WIREs Clim. Change 2, 547–569 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulkeley, H. Common knowledge? Public understanding of climate change in Newcastle, Australia. Pub. Underst. Sci. 9, 313–333 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Neill, S. J. & Hulme, M. An iconic approach for representing climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 402–410 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutton, S. G. & Tobin, R. C. Constraints on community engagement with Great Barrier Reef climate change reduction and mitigation. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 894–905 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grothmann, T. & Patt, A. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 15, 199–213 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuruppu, N. & Liverman, K. Mental preparation for climate adaptation: The role of cognition and culture in enhancing adaptive capacity of water management in Kiribati. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 657–669 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C. & Pidgeon, N. F. Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Clim. Change 1059, 46–49 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weber, E. Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change 77, 103–120 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Whitmarsh, L. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J. Risk Res. 11, 351–374 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dessai, S. & Sims, K. Public perception of drought and climate change in Southeast England. Environ. Hazards 9, 340–357 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lorenzoni, I. & Pidgeon, N. F. Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change 77, 73–95 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leviston, Z., Leitch, A., Greenhill, M., Leonard, R. & Walker, I. Australians’ Views of Climate Change (CSIRO, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reser, J. P. et al. Public Risk Perceptions, Understandings, and Responses to Climate Change in Australia and Great Britain (Griffith Univ. & Cardiff Univ., 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leiserowitz, A. International Public Opinion, Perception, and Understanding of Global Climate Change (Human Development Report Office, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Byg, A. & Salick, J. Local perspectives on a global phenomenon—Climate change in Eastern Tibetan villages. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 156–166 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bunce, M., Rosendo, S. & Brown, K. Perceptions of climate change, multiple stressors and livelihoods on marginal African coasts. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 12, 407–440 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones, L. & Boyd, E. Exploring social barriers to adaptation: Insights from Western Nepal. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 1262–1274 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Adger, N. W., Huq, S., Brown, K., Conway, D. & Hulme, M. Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Prog. Dev. Studies 3, 179–195 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. IPCC Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Parry, M., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J. & Handson, C. E.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  22. Orr, Y., Schimmer, R., Geerken, R. & Taylor, in Climate Change and Threatened Communities: Vulnerability, Capacity and Action (eds Castro, A.P. & Brokensha, D.) 175–184 (Practical Action Publishers, 2012).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J. Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res. 8, 239–260 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Armitage, D. R. & Johnson, D. Can resilience be reconciled with globalization and the increasingly complex conditions of resource degradation in Asian coastal regions? Ecol Soc 11, 2 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Larson, S. Climate Change Perceptions of East Asian Countries’ Government Representatives 2nd Report (AquaEnergie LLC & CSIRO, 2012).

  26. O’Neill, S. & Nicholson-Cole, S. ‘Fear won’t do it’: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci. Commun. 30, 355–379 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R. & Jeffries, C. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Clim. Change 1532, 600–603 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smajgl, A. & Bohensky, E. L. When households stop logging: Evidence for household adaptation from East Kalimantan. Forest Policy Econ. 20, 58–65 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Smajgl, A. Challenging beliefs through multi-level participatory modelling in Indonesia. Environ. Modelling Softw. 25, 1470–1476 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kerr, R. Amid worrisome signs of warming, ’climate fatigue’ sets in. Science 326, 926–928 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was undertaken as part of a project funded by AusAID, CSIRO and PROFOR/World Bank. The authors thank P. Fadjar and his team at the Centre for Social Forestry, UNRAM and S. A. Kurnia and his team at UNDIP for sharing their local knowledge and for their numerous critical roles in executing the surveys. O. Banerjee, M. Greenhill and D. Kirono provided constructive reviews of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.S. developed the research questions and A.S. and E.L.B. designed the survey, organized and managed the Indonesian fieldwork and oversaw data collection. T.B. led the data organization and statistical analysis for this paper, with input from all authors. All authors contributed to interpretation and presentation of the data. E.L.B. led the writing of the paper, with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin L. Bohensky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 321 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bohensky, E., Smajgl, A. & Brewer, T. Patterns in household-level engagement with climate change in Indonesia. Nature Clim Change 3, 348–351 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1762

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1762

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing