Climate change and moral judgement

Journal name:
Nature Climate Change
Volume:
2,
Pages:
243–247
Year published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nclimate1378
Published online

Abstract

Converging evidence from the behavioural and brain sciences suggests that the human moral judgement system is not well equipped to identify climate change — a complex, large-scale and unintentionally caused phenomenon — as an important moral imperative. As climate change fails to generate strong moral intuitions, it does not motivate an urgent need for action in the way that other moral imperatives do. We review six reasons why climate change poses significant challenges to our moral judgement system and describe six strategies that communicators might use to confront these challenges. Enhancing moral intuitions about climate change may motivate greater support for ameliorative actions and policies.

References

  1. National Research Council Advancing the Science of Climate Change (National Academies, 2010).
  2. IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
  3. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C. & Smith, N. Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans' Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in May 2011 (Yale Univ./George Mason Univ., 2011).
  4. Krosnick, J. A. Global warming Poll (Stanford University/GfK Roper Public Affairs & Corporate Communications, 2010).
  5. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press Economy Dominates Public's Agenda, Dims Hopes for the Future (Pew Research Center, 2011).
  6. Swim, J. et al. Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. Am. Psychol. 66, 241250 (2011).
  7. Sterman, J. D. Economics—risk communication on climate: Mental models and mass balance. Science 322, 532533 (2008).
  8. Weber, E. Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change 77, 103120 (2006).
  9. Doherty, T. J. & Clayton, S. The psychological impacts of global climate change. Am. Psychol. 66, 265276 (2011).
  10. Moser, S. C. Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Clim. Change 1, 3153 (2010).
  11. Nisbet, M. C. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51, 1223 (2009).
  12. Wardekker, A., Petersen, A. C. & van der Sluijs, J. P. Ethics and public perception of climate change: Exploring the Christian voices in the US public debate. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 512521 (2009).
  13. Moore, K. D. & Nelson, M. P. (eds) Moral Ground: Ethical Action for a Planet in Peril (Trinity Univ. Press, 2010).
  14. http://www.whatwouldjesusdrive.info.
  15. Shwom, R., Bidwell, D., Dan, A. & Dietz, T. Understanding US public support for domestic climate change policies. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 472482 (2010).
  16. Haidt, J. The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science 316, 9981002 (2007).
  17. Bazerman, M. & Tenbrunsel, A. Blind Spots: Why We Fail To Do What's Right and What To Do About It (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).
  18. Haidt, J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108, 814834 (2001).
  19. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M. & Cohen, J. D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293, 21052108 (2001).
  20. Jamieson, D. Climate change, responsibility, and justice. Sci. Eng. Ethics 16, 431445 (2010).
  21. Guglielmo, S., Monroe, A. E. & Malle, B. F. At the heart of morality lies folk psychology. Inquiry 52, 449466 (2009).
  22. Cushman, F. Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition 108, 353380 (2008).
  23. Vaish, A., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. Young children selectively avoid helping people with harmful intentions. Child Dev. 81, 16611669 (2010).
  24. Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M. & Saxe, R. The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 82358240 (2007).
  25. Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A. & Tannenbaum, D. Motivated moral reasoning. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 50, 307338 (2009).
  26. Stoll-Kleemann, S., O'Riodan, T. & Jaeger, C. C. The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: Evidence from Swiss focus groups. Glob. Environ. Change 11, 107117 (2001).
  27. Gifford, R. The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am. Psychol. 66, 290302 (2011).
  28. Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Hernandez, M., Medvec, V. & Messick, D. In fairness to future generations: The role of egocentrism, uncertainty, power, and stewardship in judgments of intergenerational allocations. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44, 233245 (2008).
  29. Weinstein, N. D. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 806820 (1980).
  30. Budescu, D. V., Broomell, S. & Por, H. Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the Intergovenmental Panel on Climate Change. Psychol. Sci. 20, 299308 (2009).
  31. McCright, A. M. & Dunlap, R. E. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol. Quart. 52, 155194 (2011).
  32. Haidt, J. & Graham, J. When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that Liberals may not recognize. Soc. Justice Res. 20, 98116 (2007).
  33. Cohen, G. L. Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85, 808822 (2003).
  34. Lord, C. G., Ross, L. & Lepper, M. R. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37, 20982109 (1979).
  35. Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117, 497529 (1995).
  36. Harris, L. T. & Fiske, L. T. Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme outgroups. Psychol. Sci. 17, 847853 (2006).
  37. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P. & Flament, C. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1, 149178 (1971).
  38. Baron, J. in Understanding Social Action, Promoting Human Rights (eds Woods, A. K., Goodman, R. & Jinks, D.) (Oxford Univ. Press, in the press).
  39. Pope Benedict XVI Caritas in Veritae: Encyclical Letter on Integral Human Development in Charity and Truth (St. Pauls Publications, 2009).
  40. Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Sondak, H. & Galinsky, A. D. Leaving a legacy: Intergenerational allocations of benefits and burdens. Bus. Ethics Quart. 20, 734 (2010).
  41. Feinberg, M. & Willer, R. Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychol. Sci. 22, 3438 (2011).
  42. Ferguson, M. A. & Branscombe, N. R. Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 30, 135142 (2010).
  43. Swim, J. K. & Bloodhart, B. Affective Responses to Climate Change (Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology, 2011).
  44. Bartlett, M. Y. & DeSteno, D. Gratitude and prosocial behavior. Psychol. Sci. 17, 319325 (2006).
  45. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B. & Norton, M. I. Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science 319, 16871688 (2008).
  46. Aknin, L. A., Dunn, E. W. & Norton, M. I. Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. J. Happiness Stud. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5 (2011).
  47. Verbeke, W., Belschak, F. & Bagozzi, R. P. The adaptive consequences of pride in personal selling. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 32, 386402 (2004).
  48. Herrald, M. M. & Tomaka, J. Patterns of emotion-specific appraisals, coping and physiological reactivity during an ongoing emotional episode. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83, 425433 (2002).
  49. Williams, L. A. & DeSteno, D. Pride and perseverance: The motivational role of pride. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 10071017 (2008).
  50. Dickerson, C. A., Thibodeau, R., Aronson, E. & Miller, D. Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22, 841854 (1992).
  51. Brown, K. W. & Kasser, T. Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Soc. Indic. Res. 74, 349368 (2005).
  52. Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L. & Goode, M. R. The psychological consequences of money. Science 314, 11541156 (2006).
  53. Deci, E.L. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 18, 105115 (1971).
  54. Wade-Benzoni, K. A. & Tost, L. P. The egoism and altruism of intergenerational behavior. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 13, 165193 (2009).
  55. Valdesolo, P. & DeSteno, D. Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion 11, 262266 (2011).
  56. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R. & Sherif, C. W. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment (Oklahoma Univ. Book Exchange, 1961).
  57. Cialdini, R. B. Influence: Science and Practice 4th edn (Allyn & Bacon, 2004).
  58. Henrich, J. & Gil-White, F. The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22, 165196 (2001).
  59. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R. & Kallgren, C. A. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 10151026 (1990).
  60. Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. & Griskevicius, V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 18, 429434 (2007).
  61. Stern, P. C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56, 407424 (2000).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, 1277 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1227, USA

    • Ezra M. Markowitz &
    • Azim F. Shariff
  2. Environmental Studies Program, 5223 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-5223, USA

    • Ezra M. Markowitz

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to:

Author details

Additional data