As the emerging field of geoengineering gains momentum, researchers must question the motivations behind their experiments and maintain an open dialogue with the public.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
The EPSRC’s Policy of Responsible Innovation from a Trading Zones Perspective
Minerva Open Access 23 March 2016
-
Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering
Climatic Change Open Access 17 May 2014
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Collingridge, D. The Social Control of Technology (Open Univ. Press, 1980).
Rayner, S., Redgwell, C., Savulescu, J., Pidgeon, N. & Kruger, T. in The Regulation of Geoengineering: Fifth Report of the Session 2009–10 HC 221 (House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, 2010); available via http://go.nature.com/FfeApx.
Owen, R. & Goldberg, N. Risk Anal. 30, 1699–1707 (2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stilgoe, J. A question of intent. Nature Clim Change 1, 325–326 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1225
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1225
This article is cited by
-
The EPSRC’s Policy of Responsible Innovation from a Trading Zones Perspective
Minerva (2016)
-
Like artificial trees? The effect of framing by natural analogy on public perceptions of geoengineering
Climatic Change (2015)
-
Public engagement on solar radiation management and why it needs to happen now
Climatic Change (2013)
-
Experiments in Science Policy: An Autobiographical Note
Minerva (2012)
