Introduction
S. pneumoniae, the causative agent of pneumonia, meningitis, otitis media and bacteremia5, is predominantly treated with
-lactams. However, there is a clear relationship between the appearance of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains and heavy clinical use of
-lactams6. Resistance in S. pneumoniae involves mutations that result in PBPs incapable of efficiently recognizing
-lactams1.
Efforts to identify new types of
-lactam antibiotics with better activity spectra or resistance profiles against pathogenic bacteria such as S. pneumoniae have resulted in generation of antibiotics including the cephalosporins, cephamycins, carbapenems and monobactams7 (Fig. 1a). The isolation of LTV (Fig. 1b), which has a unique ring structure comprising a functionalized L-cycloserinyl ring linked to a
-lactone ring, was important as LTV was the first—and so far, only—natural PBP inhibitor without a
-lactam2, 3, 4 (Fig. 1). LTV is highly active against Gram-positive bacteria and, to a lesser extent, Gram-negative pathogens8. Binding experiments have identified PBPs as the targets of LTV2, although the mechanism of PBP inhibition is unknown. Here we use microbiological, kinetic and crystallographic techniques to determine how lactivicins inhibit PBPs from drug-sensitive and drug-resistant pneumococcal strains.
Figure 1: Structures and mechanisms of action of
-lactams and lactivicins.
(a) Structures of
-lactam antibiotics. The conserved
-lactam ring is highlighted in green. (b) Structures of epimeric LTV and PLTV. (c) Outline mechanism for
-lactams showing formation of the hydrolytically stable acyl-enzyme complex (for cefotaxime: R, aminothiazolemethoxyoxime; X, OCOCH3). (d) Proposed mechanism of PBP acylation by LTV and PLTV, involving formation of a stable acyl-enzyme complex whose structure is closely analogous to that formed by cephalosporins.
Initially, LTV and PLTV were synthesized (see Methods and Supplementary Methods online) and assayed in liquid cultures for activity against the noninfectious pneumococcal strain R6 (ref. 9). Both were found to be bacteriolytic agents (Fig. 2a). Highly
-lactam–resistant isolates were then tested for susceptibility to LTV and PLTV (Table 1). For penicillin G (Compound 4), the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for drug-resistant strains were 150- to 600-fold higher than those for the drug-sensitive strain, consistent with modification of PBPs to avoid
-lactam recognition. In contrast, for LTV/PLTV, the MICs for resistant strains were only between 5- and 10-fold higher than those for the drug-sensitive R6 strain, possibly reflecting a difference in the inhibition mechanism for the lactivicins and the
-lactams. Thus, although the PBPs in drug-resistant strains are mutated to avoid
-lactam inhibition1, they can still recognize and be inhibited by lactivicins.
Figure 2: Kinetic and microbiological analyses of LTV and PLTV activity.
(a) Analysis of growth curves for drug-sensitive S. pneumoniae strain R6, in the absence or presence of various amounts of PLTV. The decrease of optical density (OD) values to zero after introduction of PLTV reveals that the antibiotic is bacteriolytic. (b) k2/K values for penicillin G, LTV and PLTV, measured for both PBP2x-R6 (drug-sensitive laboratory strain) and PBP2x-5204 (highly drug-resistant, clinical pneumococcal strain). See Methods for conditions.
Full size image (36 KB)Because PBP2x is a resistance determinant in pneumococcal strains10, kinetic analyses for lactivicins were carried out on PBP2x from sensitive (R6) and
-lactam-resistant (5204) strains (Fig. 2b). PLTV had a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 7.9
M against PBP2x-5204, compared to 150
M for LTV. Second-order rate constants (k2/K) are used to characterize the acylation efficiency of PBPs by
-lactams. The k2/K value of penicillin G for PBP2x-5204 was over 1,000-fold lower than that for PBP2x-R6 (ref. 11). LTV and PLTV also had lower k2/K values against PBP2x-5204, and PLTV was apparently the more efficient inhibitor. Caution should be exerted in comparing the k2/K data for different types of inhibitors, although it is notable that the difference in apparent k2/K values for the two PBPs was markedly lower for PLTV than for LTV and penicillin G.
To investigate the mechanism of PBP inhibition by LTV and PLTV, we initially incubated a soluble form of pneumococcal PBP1b (PBP1b*) with the inhibitors and conducted mass spectrometric analyses. The mass increments between PBP1b* (51,416 Da) and the inhibitor complexes were 272 Da and 364 Da for LTV and PLTV respectively, consistent with the formation of covalent adducts. The complexes were stable for more than 24 h, well beyond the lifetime of the bacterial division cycle.
We then solved crystal structures of S. pneumoniae PBP1b* complexed to LTV or PLTV (see Supplementary Table 1 online). PBP1b*-inhibitor structures were only obtained after PBP1b* crystals complexed with the pseudosubstrate N-benzoyl-D-alanylmercaptoacetic acid (S2d, Compound 5) were washed and then incubated with LTV or PLTV12. Structures were solved to 2.6-Å (LTV) and 2.4-Å resolution (PLTV) by molecular replacement using the PBP1b structure as a search model (see Methods). The overall folds of the complexes were similar to the reported PBP1b* structure12 (r.m.s. deviation between the LTV and PLTV complex structures for all backbone atoms (NCCO) was 0.91 Å). Briefly, PBP1b* is a three-domain protein, comprising a central transpeptidase domain flanked by a C-terminal
-strand–rich region and an N-terminal domain that links the transpeptidase and glycosyltransferase domains (latter domain mostly absent in the structure). When complexed to LTV or PLTV, the conformations of the active site are very similar to that observed in an apparently 'open' form, as when PBP1b* is complexed with relatively large
-lactam inhibitors such as cefotaxime12. These conformations contrast with the apo form of PBP1b*, where the active site is unavailable for inhibitor binding because the entry of the catalytic cleft is closed by the
3/
4 loop12.
The structures reveal that the atoms derived from the L-cycloserine and
-lactone rings of LTV and PLTV are nearly superimposable and that both rings of the inhibitors are open. LTV and PLTV are covalently linked to the nucleophilic O
of Ser460 by an ester and are present in high occupancy (Fig. 3a,b). The carboxylate group of LTV and PLTV
to the cleaved cycloserine nitrogen interacts with the O
of Thr652 and Thr654, part of the conserved SXXK motif, and with the O
of Ser516, part of the conserved SXN motif (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 1 online). The carbonyl of the cleaved cycloserine is located in the oxyanion hole and interacts with backbone nitrogen atoms from Ser460 and Thr654. In the PLTV structure, the carboxyethyl moiety resulting from the cleavage of the
-lactone is positioned to form hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group of Tyr498 (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 1). The amide carbonyl of the LTV and PLTV side chain is positioned to form hydrogen bonds with Asn518 N
2, which lies on the loop between
4 and
5 (conserved SXN motif), and with the backbone carbonyl of Thr654. The hydrophobic phenoxyacetyl side chain of PLTV, which might have a role in stabilizing surrounding loops, folds back over the ring-derived inhibitor atoms and sterically blocks the entry to the catalytic cleft (Figs. 3 and 4), consistent with the kinetic data revealing that PLTV is a more potent inhibitor than LTV.
Figure 3: Stereoviews from crystal structures of the PBP1b*-LTV and PBP1b*-PLTV complexes.
(a) Fo – Fc map (green) contoured at 2.4
, generated before inclusion of LTV in the model. (b) Fo – Fc map (green), contoured at 2.4
, for the PLTV molecule. Selected active site residues are shown as sticks; LTV and PLTV backbones are shown in blue. Notably, ester link is present between the Ser460 side chain and the carbonyl of the LTV/PLTV cycloserine ring, and both cycloserine and lactone rings of the inhibitors are open. Figure was prepared using PyMOL (http://pymol.sourceforge.net/).
Figure 4: Stereoview overlay of the active site complexes of PBP1b*-cefotaxime, PBP1b*-LTV and PBP1b*-PLTV.
Atoms derived from the opened
-lactam and lactone rings in LTV and PLTV show structural convergence to those derived from the reaction of cefotaxime with PBP1b*. In total, PLTV makes eight hydrogen bonds to PBP1b*, whereas LTV makes seven. LTV (green), PLTV (blue) and cefotaxime (yellow) are shown as sticks. Residues involved in hydrogen bonds (gray dashed lines) with PLTV are shown as white sticks (Ser516 not shown). Figure was prepared using PyMOL.
Although the lactivicin and cephalosporin ring systems are very different (Fig. 1), the backbone structures of the LTV and PLTV complexes reveal convergence with the backbone of cefotaxime, in which only the
-lactam is opened (Figs. 1 and 4 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Structural analogy is observed for the C3, C4 and C6 carbon and N5 nitrogen atoms of the cefotaxime dihydrothiazine ring and the O1 and N2 cycloserine atoms and most atoms from the cleaved LTV and PLTV lactone ring. The C4 cefotaxime carboxylate and the C6 carboxylate groups of LTV and PLTV occupy closely related positions, and the LTV- and PLTV-derived carboxyethyl moieties point in the same direction as the C3 methylene of cefotaxime, suggesting that substitutions on lactivicins at this position will improve activity as observed for cephalosporins.
In contrast to the ring-derived atoms, the acetamido side chains of LTV and PLTV occupy different positions from that of cefotaxime. Although the oxygen atoms of the cefotaxime oximino group and the PLTV phenoxy group occupy the same region, the absence of atoms analogous to the sulfur and C-2 of the cephem nucleus in the lactivicins seems to enable the hydrophobic side chain of PLTV to fold and approach the position occupied by the sulfur of the dihydrothiazine ring in the cephalosporin-PBP complex. Such a side chain conformation implies that the potency of the lactivicins could be further improved by substitution to enable occupation of the typical
-lactam side chain binding pocket.
The combined results imply that the stable acyl-enzyme complex from the lactivicins is formed by a process in which initial nucleophilic attack of Ser460 O
onto the carbonyl of the L-cycloserine releases the cycloserine nitrogen lone pair, thus enabling opening of the neighboring
-lactone ring (Fig. 1d). Thermodynamically favorable isomerization of the double bond then leads to the crystallographically observed complex. A study on the hydrolysis rates of lactams found that
-lactams are approximately 100 times less reactive than analogous
-lactams13. However, the unique bicyclic ring structure of the lactivicins enables them to fulfill the requirements to act as potent PBP inhibitors. In addition to fitting within the PBP1b* active site (D.S.F., unpublished modeling data), the lactivicins are sufficiently activated to (i) react rapidly with the active site nucleophile, (ii) react irreversibly and (iii) form an acyl-enzyme complex that is stable to hydrolysis. In the case of the lactivicins, the potential deficiencies of direct
-lactam analogs of
-lactams14 with respect to (i) and (ii) are overcome by the electron-withdrawing groups on the lactam nitrogen and in the case of (ii) by 'secondary' opening of the
-lactone ring. This secondary ring opening has some precedent in the mechanism of serine
-lactamase inhibition by clavulanic acid (Compound 6)15, 16. In the case of (iii), as in the
-lactams, hydrolysis is probably prevented by the presence of the lactam/cycloserine skeleton, as with the natural substrate (the stem peptide), the C-terminal portion exits the active site and allows a 'hydrolytic' water molecule to enter.
The lower difference in MIC and apparent k2/K values between the drug-sensitive and drug-resistant S. pneumoniae strains treated with PLTV compared to
-lactams (Table 1) may reflect a different mechanistic pathway by which the various bicyclic ring systems of the lactivicins and the
-lactams react with the PBP active sites to achieve formation of a stable acyl-enzyme complex. Thus, lactivicins and their analogs may represent a good starting point for the identification of new drugs that target
-lactam-resistant pathogens.
Methods
General.
S2d was synthesized as reported17, and fluorescein-labeled ampicillin was prepared as described18 (characterization matched published data for both compounds). Penicillin G was from Sigma, and 2-oxoglutarate (Compound 7) was from Fluka. PBP2x-5204, PBP2x-R6 and PBP1b were prepared as described19. Kinetic assays were performed at 30 °C in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Dimethylformamide (1%) was added for the PLTV inhibition studies.
Preparation of LTV and PLTV.
LTV was prepared according to a reported procedure20, with modifications. Briefly, 2-oxoglutarate was selectively protected as a 4-nitrobenzyl ester to produce 5-(4-nitrobenzyl)-4-oxoglutarate (Compound 8) and condensed with N-benzyloxycarbonyl-L-cycloserine (Compound 9). Subsequent removal of protecting groups by hydrogenolysis and N-acetylation produced LTV as the sodium salt. PLTV was prepared analogously by condensation of Compound 8 and N-phenoxyacetyl-L-cycloserine (Compound 10), followed by deprotection of the adduct by hydrogenolysis. LTV and PLTV were stable (>90%) in D2O for more than 48 h at 4 °C by 1H NMR analysis. Hydrolysis of LTV by
-lactamases ablates antibacterial activity3.
Determination of IC50 for LTV and PLTV.
Inhibitors were incubated with PBP2x-5204 (0.8
M) for 120 min (LTV) or 60 min (PLTV). Active PBP was then counterlabeled with 10
M fluorescein-labeled ampicillin for 40 min. The reaction was stopped and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by fluorescence visualization using a Molecular Imager FX (Bio-Rad) and the program Quantify One (Bio-Rad). Background fluorescence was subtracted, and IC50 values were determined from a plot of the residual activities against inhibitor concentrations. Fit was determined using SigmaPlot (Systat Software) and the equation

where y0 is activity with high concentration of inhibitor (y0
0), y0 + a is activity in the absence of inhibitor (x = 0), and b = IC50 (a – y0) / (a + y0); so for y0
0, b
IC50.
Determination of the second-order rate constant k2/K.
The interaction of PBPs with
-lactams can be described by the following equation:

For PBP2x-5204, the second-order rate constant k2/K was determined using the equation21

where IC50 << K and tIC50 is incubation time used for the determination of IC50 values.
For PBP2x-R6, the thioester S2d22 was used as a reporter substrate. Assays were conducted at 30 °C in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 1 mM S2d and 2 mM 4,4'-dithiodipyridine (Acros Organics). Protein (0.1
M) was mixed with various concentrations of inhibitors. S2d hydrolysis was followed by absorbance (Uvikon 860 spectrometer linked to a microcomputer through an RS232 interface). Once the time courses were complete, Ki values were determined and k2/K values were calculated23.
Mass spectrometric analyses.
Covalent adducts were identified by mass spectrometry using a 1:1 ratio of protein to inhibitor, with a final protein concentration of 500 nM. Samples were quenched after reacting for 1 min in a solution containing water and acetonitrile (9/1 v/v) and 0.2% formic acid. Mass spectrometric analysis was then conducted using a Q-TOF micro machine (Waters) operated with a needle voltage of 3 kV, a sample cone voltage of 55 V and an extraction voltage of 2V. Deacylation assays were done using the same methodology.
Protein purification and crystallization.
PBP1b* was purified and cocrystallized in the presence of S2d as described12. The crystals were then washed in 1
l of ligand-free mother liquor and soaked in a 34 mM LTV solution for 15 min or a 30 mM PLTV solution for 4 min. Crystals were cryoprotected in a solution containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), 1 M ammonium sulfate, 1 M NaCl, 12% ethylene glycol and either 680
M LTV or 600
M PLTV. The solution was then flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. Mass spectrometric analyses did not detect any residual bound S2d.
Structural determination of the intermediates.
Data were collected at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (Grenoble) on ID14-EH2 for the LTV complex and on ID23-2 for the PLTV complex, and processed using XDS24 (Supplementary Table 1). Structures were solved by molecular replacement with AMORE25, using the coordinates of PBP1b lacking residues 460, 516–518 and 650–661 as a model. Reconstruction and refinement steps were done with COOT26 and REFMAC27; additional simulated annealing steps were done with CNS28. Inhibitor structures were generated with the monomer library sketcher from the CCP4i suite27. The positions of the LTV- and PLTV-derived atoms in the active sites of each structure were unambiguously identified in initial Fo – Fc difference maps. The PBP1b*-LTV and PBP1b*-PLTV complexes showed 98% and 97.2% of the non-glycine residues in the most favored and allowed Ramachandran regions (PROCHECK), respectively. The structure of PBP1b* in complex with N-benzoyl-D-alanine resulting from S2d hydrolysis has been solved (P.M. and A.D., unpublished data), and the density within its active site is distinct from what is observed for the LTV and PLTV complexes.
MIC determination.
We used a noninfective, nonencapsulated S. pneumoniae strain (R6) and infective, penicillin-resistant strains isolated from patients in the Chambéry (38040505), Briançon (38030509) and Grenoble (4790/5204) public hospitals in France. All subjects gave informed written consent. The work was carried out according to the ethical principles of the Hopital Universitaire de Grenoble, France. Strains were grown in Todd-Hewitt medium to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.3 at 37 °C. Strains were subsequently plated on Columbia blood agar plates enriched with 5% horse blood containing concentrations of LTV and PLTV ranging from 0 to 100
g ml-
1. MICs were determined by visual determination of growth arrest on plates.
Accession codes.
Protein Data Bank: previously deposited accession codes for PBP1b and PBP1b* are 2BG1 and 2BG4, respectively. Structures obtained in this study have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 2JE5 (PBP1b*-LTV) and 2JCH (PBP1b*-PLTV).
Note: Supplementary information and chemical compound information is available on the Nature Chemical Biology website.
Author contributions
P.M. and A.D. carried out the crystallographic analyses; D.S.F. and T.B. Jr. carried out the synthetic studies; A.Z., A.L., P.M. and B.J. carried out microbiological and kinetic analyses; A.D., D.S.F. and C.J.S. designed the study, analyzed data and, together with the other authors, wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

-lactone rings and is the only known natural PBP inhibitor that does not contain a
-lactam
-lactam–sensitive and