Table 1


From the following article

Reporting data from high-throughput screening of small-molecule libraries

James Inglese, Caroline E Shamu & R Kiplin Guy

Nature Chemical Biology 3, 438 - 441 (2007)

doi:10.1038/nchembio0807-438

BACK TO ARTICLE

Table 1. Reporting parameters for small-molecule screening data

CategoryParametersExamples (see text for more detail)
AssayNature of the assayCell-free multicomponent assay, or mammalian cell-based imaging assay
 Assay strategyDetection of double-stranded DNA using intercalated fluorescence enhancement of fluorophore, or cellular cytosol-to-nuclear translocation of GFP-tagged nuclear hormone receptor
 Reagents and sourcesStandard information
 Assay protocolKey steps are outlined in Table 2
Library screenedNature of the libraryRule of 5–compliant or stochastic clustering analysis gave 332 fingerprint diversity clusters, normalized to 17.1 clusters per 100 compounds (http://ccc.chem.pitt.edu/upcmld/Library_Diversity_Analysis.html)
 Size of the library50,000 compounds arrayed in 384-well plates as single compounds at 10 mM in DMSO
 SourceUniversity of Kansas Chemical Methodology and Library Development Center
 DetailsAn SD-format file of the UPCMLD library containing structure, ID, etc. is available at http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (use PubChem compound UPCMLD)
 Quality controlAll compounds assured by vendor as >90% pure with provided QC data; verified internally on 5% random sampling
 Concentration testedConstant 10 muM concentration, 0.1% DMSO, 1:1,000 dilution
HTS processFormat96-well imaging plate (BD BioSciences)
 Plate controlsPositive control: EC50 agonist (A1-D1); negative control: EC50 agonist + 10times IC50 antagonist (E1-H1); 12A-H: titration of agonist
 Plate number and duration150 96-well plates over 3 d
 Reagent and compound dispensing systemsReagents and compounds delivered using a VPrep (Velocity11)
 Output, detector, analysis softwareFixed endpoint; imaging microscopy using ArrayScanVTi (Cellomics, Inc.); Molecular Translocation BioApplication (Cellomics, Inc.)
 Correction factorsB-score analysis and correction
 Normalization% inhibition = 100 times (corrected sample result - average of positive control)/(average of negative - average of positive control)
 PerformanceZ and Z' plotted per plate for 100-plate screen. Interplate EC50 MSR = 2.5
Post-HTS analysisSelection of activesActives were selected from the primary screen using a threshold based on statistical criteria
 Retesting of initial activesOriginal samples rearrayed and retested using screening assay; compounds with replicated activity tested in dose-response mode
 Structure confirmationCompound structure verified by analytical chemistry methods
 Compound purification/resynthesisValidated actives resynthesized or repurchased and retested
Screen resultsList of all screening positivesList of positives ranked by % activity at fixed concentration and defined selection cutoff threshold
 List of validated compoundsRank order of compounds, based on score in selection criteria
 Comments on active compound selectionPotency, cellular efficacy, pharmacological parameters and toxicity used to rank actives
BACK TO ARTICLE