Commentary


Nature Cell Biology 2, E115 - E119 (2000)
doi:10.1038/35017124

Is there a cause-and-effect relationship between alpha-synuclein fibrillization and Parkinson's disease?

Matthew S. Goldberg & Peter T. Lansbury Jr

  1. Matthew S. Goldberg and Peter T. Lansbury Jr are at the Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, The Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Correspondence to: Peter T. Lansbury Jr e-mail: lansbury@cnd.bwh.harvard.edu


The first gene to be linked to Parkinson's disease encodes the neuronal protein alpha-synuclein. Recent mouse and Drosophila models of Parkinson's disease support a central role for the process of alpha-synuclein fibrillization in pathogenesis. However, some evidence indicates that the fibril itself may not be the pathogenic species. Our own biophysical studies suggest that a structured fibrillization intermediate or an alternatively assembled oligomer may be responsible for neuronal death. This speculation can now be experimentally tested in the animal models. Such experiments will have implications for the development of new therapies for Parkinson's disease and related neurodegenerative diseases.


Parkinson's disease is a common age-associated degenerative disorder characterized by rigidity, difficulty in initiating movements and a resting tremor1, 2. At autopsy, the brain is characterized by loss of basal ganglia neurons, predominantly dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra. The underlying cause of this degeneration is unknown, so current treatments for the disease are based on ameliorating the motor symptoms, either by replacement of the deficient neurotransmitter (for example, by L-DOPA therapy) or, less commonly, by direct surgical perturbation of the affected neuronal circuitry. A possible clue to the aetiology of Parkinson's is the presence in some of the nigral neurons that remain at autopsy of fibrillar cytoplasmic inclusions known as Lewy bodies3. In contrast, Lewy bodies in cortical neurons characterize diffuse Lewy body disease (DLBD), a relatively common dementia often mistaken for Alzheimer's disease4. Whether Lewy bodies are a cause or a consequence of neuronal death in Parkinson's disease and DLBD, or are an unrelated epiphenomenon, has yet to be determined. This question is reminiscent of the unresolved role of fibrillar deposits (amyloid plaques and nuclear inclusions, respectively) in the aetiology of Alzheimer's and Huntington's diseases5, 6.

A clue from familial Parkinson's

The genetic contribution to idiopathic late-onset Parkinson's disease is difficult to determine because of the existence of a significant presymptomatic phase that has been revealed by positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging; neuropathological examination shows that loss of around 60% of the nigral dopaminergic neurons can apparently be tolerated. It is, however, clear from studies of identical twins that cases in which one twin is diagnosed before the age of 50 have a significant genetic component7. The first Parkinson's disease gene to be identified was linked to a rare, autosomal-dominant, early-onset form of the disease (FPD; other genes have been reported subsequently, see Box 1)8, 9. This gene encodes the protein alpha-synuclein, which is widely expressed in the brain. Subsequent to reports of the genetic linkage, immunohistochemical10, 11 and biochemical12 studies of Lewy bodies from idiopathic cases showed that wild-type alpha-synuclein is a major component of the insoluble fibrillar portion. The fact that the disease-associated gene encodes the fibrillar protein is again reminiscent of other neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's and Huntington's ( Box 2), and suggests that a gain of toxic function may be linked to alpha-synuclein fibrillization.

An alpha-synuclein knockout mouse

alpha-Synuclein is expressed throughout the brain at high levels13, but there is little information on its normal function. Unlike most proteins of 140 amino acids, neither wild–type alpha-synuclein nor the two disease–linked mutants fold into structured, globular forms in vitro; the protein is intrinstically disordered or 'natively unfolded'14, 15. This unusual behaviour raises the question of how an unstructured cytoplasmic protein evades rapid degradation. It may be that alpha-synuclein exists in vivo as a complex with another protein or proteins; one possible candidate has been identified11. alpha-synuclein is a presynaptic protein that appears to be associated with vesicular structures16, 17 and has been linked to learning, development and plasticity18. Thus, despite apparently convergent evidence that points to a toxic gain of alpha-synuclein function being responsible for Parkinson's disease, the possibility that disease results, in full or in part, from the loss of functional alpha-synuclein must be investigated. Knockout mice, in which the alpha-synuclein gene has been removed, represent one loss–of–function model. These mice appear to develop normally and exhibit slightly altered stimulus–dependent dopamine release, suggesting that alpha-synuclein is a negative regulator of dopamine release19. The brains of the knockout mice, like those of Parkinson's patients, are characterized by reduced levels of striatal dopamine, but, unlike Parkinson's brains, they do not contain Lewy bodies, nor are they characterized by neuronal or synaptic loss (Table 1). Although it is possible that these differences may be related to the slow progression of the disease relative to the lifespan of the mouse, it is more likely that some or all of the features of Parkinson's disease are a consequence of alpha-synuclein–dependent toxicity, casting further suspicion on the process of fibrillization.


alpha-synuclein-expressing transgenics

The gain of toxic function scenario inspired two recent animal models of Parkinson's disease – transgenic mice20 and Drosophila21 (see Table 1). These animal models recreate certain features of the disease by expression of human wild–type alpha-synuclein (in the case of the flies, both mutant proteins have similar effects). In both cases, cytoplasmic inclusions that resemble Lewy bodies, to different degrees, were detected. Both reports note a rough correlation between the transgene expression level and inclusion formation; in the mouse, the correlation is with the number of inclusions, in the flies, with the rate at which fibrillar inclusions appear. In the mouse model, the alpha-synuclein inclusions have no detectable fibrillar substructure, unlike those in the 'symptomatic' fly (see below) and those in post–mortem Parkinson's and DLBD brains. Thus the mouse inclusions, as well as diffuse alpha-synuclein deposits detected in 'presymptomatic' fly brains, may represent a prefibrillar stage. Importantly, both the mice and the flies have age-dependent pathological and behavioural dopaminergic abnormalities; synaptic loss in the mice and cell loss in the flies – and motor deficiencies in both organisms (Table 1). The onset of a motor phenotype was in both cases correlated to inclusion formation; in the case of the mice, the expression level of wild-type alpha-synuclein correlated with the frequency of inclusions and with the extent of the phenotype. Similarly, in the case of the flies, the appearance of inclusions parallelled the onset of motor abnormalities, consistent with alpha-synuclein fibrillization being critical for disease.

alpha-synuclein oligomerization

The transformation of alpha-synuclein from its normal soluble state to the disease-associated fibrillar state involves coupled changes in its conformation (increased beta-sheet content) and its quaternary structure (oligomerization and subsequent fibrillization). There is no evidence for a stable, structured alpha-synuclein monomer; that is, the beta-sheet conformation is not long-lived in the absence of oligomerization (this also seems to be the case for many other fibrillogenic proteins)22. The FPD-linked mutations do not significantly alter the conformation of alpha-synuclein, suggesting that they may instead influence the intermolecular interactions that drive formation of the ordered fibrillar form15. Our own studies of in vitro fibril formation by alpha-synuclein, and also by the Abeta protein of Alzheimer's disease, demonstrate that it does not follow a simple one-step transition, but rather a complex process that involves one or more discrete intermediates, termed protofibrils (Fig. 1)15, 23, 24, 25, 26. The possible existence of these prefibrillar species in vivo offers a simple explanation for the fact that fibrillar alpha-synuclein is not detected in 'symptomatic' transgenic mice20; that is, a protofibril, rather than the fibril itself, may be pathogenic. This scenario (Fig. 2) is also consistent with the in vitro behaviour of the A30P variant of alpha-synuclein, which is linked to early–onset Parkinson's disease9. A30P accumulates in an oligomeric form, as it forms fibrillar species more slowly than does wild-type alpha-synuclein27. We have characterized several alpha-synuclein oligomers that are structurally related to the fibril in that they, like fibrils but unlike the natively unfolded monomer, contain beta–sheet structure (J-C. Rochet and P.T.L., unpublished observations). These oligomers are much smaller than fibrils and appear early in the fibrillization process (Fig. 1)26, 27.

Figure 1: Images obtained by atomic force microscopy (AFM) of several discrete alpha-synuclein oligomers; placed in a pathway that is consistent with the time–course of alpha-synuclein fibrillization and parallels the pathway of Abold beta fibrillization, which has been extensively studied.

Figure 1 : Images obtained by atomic force microscopy (AFM) of several discrete |[alpha]|-synuclein
oligomers; placed in a pathway that is consistent with the time|[ndash]|course
of |[alpha]|-synuclein fibrillization and parallels the pathway of A|[bgr]| fibrillization,
which has been extensively studied.

The first step involves the conversion of natively unfolded monomeric alpha-synuclein to an apparently spherical (height is 3–5 nm) oligomeric form that is rich in beta–sheet structure (by circular dichroism, J-C. Rochet and P.L., unpublished). This is the step that seems to be sensitive to both mutations linked to Parkinson's disease27. It is not difficult to imagine how age-associated or toxin-induced2 deficits in energy metabolism could lead to increased concentrations of cytoplasmic synuclein (the proteasome is ATP-dependent) and/or the inability to prevent oligomerization (many chaperones are ATP-dependent). Subsequent steps seem to involve a series of sphere–sphere annealing steps, leading to chain-like assemblies (height is 3–5 nm) that can either fuse head-to-tail to produce an annular protofibril (height is 3–5 nm), or can anneal side-to-side to produce, by a cooperative mechanism, large fibrils (height. is around 8 nm and length is much greater than chain protofibrils). The blue scale bar = 250 nm.

Full size image (23 KB)

Figure 2: A scenario, based on the actual species shown in Fig. 1, that offers one explanation for the imperfect correlation between fibrils/Lewy bodies and Parkinson's disease.

Figure 2 : A scenario, based on the actual species shown in Fig.
1, that offers one explanation for the imperfect correlation between
fibrils/Lewy bodies and Parkinson|[rsquo]|s disease.

This scenario represents one extreme version of a group of related possible mechanisms, in that it holds that the fibrils are inert. In fact, a low level of toxicity (per alpha-synuclein molecule) may be associated with the fibrillar state. Two critical steps that could be targeted by small drug-like molecules are highlighted in red and green. Inhibition of the initial formation of beta-sheet containing spherical protofibril (red step) might be expected to decrease the number of Lewy bodies and delay onset of Parkinson's-like symptoms. In contrast, inhibition of the protofibril-to-fibril transition (green step) might be expected to decrease the number of Lewy bodies while accelerating onset of disease symptoms, by causing accumulation of a toxic species. Finally, the effect of inhibition of protofibril circularization (blue step) may help to determine whether the annular protofibril is the toxic species or a harmless off-pathway reservoir for toxic protofibrillar forms.

Full size image (8 KB)

The proposal that a prefibrillar intermediate or an alternative assembly state of alpha-synuclein is toxic also explains two observations made on pathological examination of human brains. The first is that the substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons containing Lewy bodies appear to be 'healthier,' by morphological and biochemical criteria, than neighbouring neurons28, 29; the second is that it is not uncommon to observe 'incidental' Lewy bodies at autopsy of aged individuals who had no symptoms of Parkinson's or other neurodegenerative diseases30. Thus, fibrillar inclusions may sequester toxic species and/or divert alpha-synuclein from toxic assembly pathways. Careful studies of pathogenesis in animal models of related neurodegenerative diseases also support the notion that a nonfibrillar species, the formation of which is linked to fibrillization, is pathogenic. First, two transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease exhibit Alzeimer's-like abnormalities before fibrillar plaques can be detected31, 32. Second, at the time of birth, a transgenic mouse model of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease contains abnormal forms of the prion protein (PrP), albeit not the form correlated with full-blown disease (PrPSc)33. As the animals age, neurologic abnormalities can be detected and, subsequent to that time, PrPSc appears in the brains of these animals. Third, several cellular and animal models of Huntington's disease and other triplet-expansion diseases have demonstrated that experimental perturbations that reduce the number of nuclear inclusions that are detectable by light microscopy increase the severity of disease-related abnormalities (see Box 2). Unfortunately, direct detection of the prefibrillar intermediates that may be responsible for these effects has proved extremely difficult, because the Abeta- and alpha-synuclein-derived oligomeric species formed and characterized in vitro (Fig. 1) are transient, too small to be reliably detected in tissue by light and electron microscopy, and relatively unstable to dilution and other conditions used to extract abnormal protein from tissue.

The missing link

The mechanism by which abnormal alpha-synuclein oligomers may cause dysfunction and death of dopaminergic neurons is the missing link in the model of the Parkinson's disease pathogenic cascade depicted in Fig. 2 (ref. 2). It is important to remember that the toxic pathway was not necessarily optimized by evolution, but may be a survivor of a selective process that would disfavour its interference with reproduction5. Thus, the cell-type selectivity of Parkinson's disease degeneration, a hallmark of the disease, may merely be a consequence of the fact that dopamine is, itself, neurotoxic, so that any disruption of its packaging and secretion could result in cell death. Alternatively, it may be that the dopaminergic cytoplasm presents the optimal environment for alpha-synuclein oligomerization or that the target of the toxic species is most highly expressed in these neurons. Structured alpha-synuclein oligomers could exhibit potent interactions with certain targets that present repeating interacting motifs, such as membrane surfaces, proteoglycans and other oligomeric proteins. These binding partners will be difficult to identify, because the popular methods for identifying protein-protein interactions in pathways (for example, yeast two-hybrid assay) are designed to discover monomer-monomer complexes. Although it is not necessary to understand the mechanism of oligomer toxicity in order to devise effective therapies for Parkinson's disease, as once the toxic species has been identified, oligomerization itself can be targeted, elucidation of this pathway will provide new downstream targets for therapeutic intervention.

Aetiology of transgenic animals

The animal models of Parkinson's disease allow the timing of alpha-synuclein oligomerization and fibrillization to be compared to disease-associated phenomena and testable aetiological models of disease to be constructed. The promise of these models is that they can be used to distinguish cause and effect experimentally, by observing the consequences of various perturbations on the progression of the disease and its associated phenomena. If it is possible to 'uncouple' a particular phenomenon (for example, alpha-synuclein fibrillization) from disease progression, then it is unequivocally an epiphenomenon. The repeated failure to do so suggests, but does not prove, a direct involvement of that phenomenon in the pathway.

Two classes of perturbations can be envisioned. The first are endogenous perturbations from altered expression of existing or mutant genes, and the second are exogenous perturbations from drug-like compounds. Using classical Drosophila genetic methods, mutants can be selected on the basis of their ability to suppress or enhance disease in the fly34. Suppressor genes are candidate protective factors, and the products of these genes are potential protein therapeutics. Alternatively, using classical screening methods of medicinal chemistry, drug-like molecules can be selected on the basis of their ability to modify a particular disease-associated phenomenon in vitro . For example, molecules could be selected that inhibit alpha-synuclein fibrillization, while allowing oligomerization (Fig. 2). According to the speculative model presented above, these molecules should accelerate disease onset and progression by causing accumulation of the toxic oligomer. Molecules of this class would, however, inhibit appearance of fibrillar Lewy-body-like inclusions. A similar effect may account for the effects of certain proteins that inhibit the appearance of visible inclusions on experimental triplet repeat disease (see Box 2).

Therapeutics and diagnostics

The rapid progression from identification of the first Parkinson's disease gene in 1997 to animal models in early 2000 holds great promise that, in the next few years, the pathogenesis of the disease might be elucidated to the extent that target proteins and processes can be identified and new therapeutic approaches developed. The successful implementation of any approach based on the earliest pathogenic events, such as alpha-synuclein oligomerization, may, however, depend on the detection of very early preclinical disease. The possibility of identifying Parkinson's disease presymptomatically is likely to result from rapid advances in two distinct areas of research. First, genetic screening may allow the identification, and eventually the detection, of susceptibility factors for the disease, and thus allow the identification of individuals who are at increased risk of contracting it. Second, imaging methods such as PET that are already able to detect presymptomatic dopaminergic deficits will become more practical and less expensive, allowing secondary screens of the at-risk populations. Although economic considerations may prevent widespread screening for presymptomatic Parkinson's disease, these advances are likely to be critical for the development of novel therapeutics.



Top

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the NINDS for their support in the form of a Morris K. Udall Parkinson's disease research center of excellence at Brigham and Women's Hospital. The continuing support of the Foundation for Neurologic Diseases (Newburyport, Massachusetts) is also gratefully acknowledged. P.L. thanks the Alzheimer's Association for a 1999 Zenith award. M.S.G. acknowledges the NIH for support in the form of a postdoctoral traineeship in molecular biology of neurodegeneration. We also thank the following individuals for suggestions concerning the manuscript: Mel Feany, Michael Schlossmacher, Matthew Frosch, Jie Shen, Anne Hart, Ethan Signer and members of the Lansbury laboratory. We also thank Parsa Kazemi–Esfarjani and Mel Feany for sharing their unpublished results and Tomas Ding for supplying the AFM images in Fig. 1.

Top

References

  1. Dunnett, S. B. & Bjorklund, A. Nature Suppl. 399, A32–A39 (1999). | ChemPort |
  2. Dawson, T. M. Cell 101, 115–118 ( 2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Forno, L. S. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 55, 259– 272 (1996). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  4. Kosaka, K. & Iseki, E. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 9, 271–275 (1996). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Lansbury, P. T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3342– 3344 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  6. Lansbury, P. T. Neuron 19, 1151–1154 ( 1997). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  7. Tanner, C. M. et al. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 281, 341– 346 (1999). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
  8. Polymeropoulos, M. H. et al. Science 276, 2045– 2047 (1997). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Kruger, R. et al. Nat. Genet. 18, 106–108 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Spillantini, M. G., Crowther, R. A., Jakes, R. , Hasegawa, M. & Goedert, M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6469–6473 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  11. Engelender, S. et al. Nat Genet. 22, 110– 114 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. Baba, M. et al. Am. J. Pathol. 152, 879– 884 (1998). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  13. Iwai, A. et al. Neuron 14, 467–475(1995). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  14. Weinreb, P. H., Zhen, W., Poon, A. W., Conway, K. A. & Lansbury, P. T. Jr. Biochemistry 35, 13709–13715 (1996). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  15. Conway, K. A., Harper, J. D. & Lansbury, P. T. Nat. Med. 4, 1318– 1320 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  16. Scheller, R. H.& Barchas, J. D. Science 242, 13–14 (1988). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  17. Jensen, P. H., Nielsen, M. S., Jakes, R. , Dotti, C. G. & Goedert, M. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 26292–26294 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  18. George, J. M., Jin, H., Woods, W. S.& Clayton, D. F. Neuron 15, 361–372 (1995). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  19. Abeliovich, A. et al. Neuron 25, 239–252 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  20. Masliah, E. et al. Science 287, 1265– 1269 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  21. Feany, M. & Bender, W. Nature 404, 394–398 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  22. Rochet, J. C. & Lansbury, P. T. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 60–68 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  23. Harper, J. D., Lieber, C. M. & Lansbury, P. T. Chem. Biol. 4, 951– 959 (1997). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  24. Harper, J. D., Wong, S. S., Lieber, C. M. & Lansbury, P. T. Jr. Chem. Biol. 4, 119– 125 (1997). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  25. Harper, J. D., Wong, S. S., Lieber, C. M. & Lansbury, P. T. Jr. Biochemistry 38, 8972– 8980 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  26. Conway, K. A., Harper, J. D. & Lansbury, P. T. Jr. Biochemistry 39, 2552–2563 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  27. Conway, K. A., et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (in the press).
  28. Tompkins, M. M.& Hill, W. D. Brain Res. 775, 24–29 (1997). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  29. Tompkins, M. M., Basgall, E. J., Zamrini, E. & Hill, W. D. Am. J. Pathol. 150, 119–131 (1997). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  30. Forno, L. S. & Langston, J. W. Neurodegeneration 2, 19–24 (1993).
  31. Moechars, D. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 6483– 6492 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  32. Hsia, A. Y. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3228– 3233 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  33. Chiesa, R., Piccardo, P., Ghetti, B.& Harris, D. A. Neuron 21, 1339–1351 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  34. Kazemi–Esfarjani, P. & Benzer , S. Science 287, 1837 –1840 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI |
  35. Leroy, E. et al. Nature 395, 451–452(1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  36. Kitada, T. et al. Nature 392, 605–608 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  37. Minton, A. P. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 34–39 (2000).
  38. Li, S. H. & Li, X. J. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 777–782 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  39. Scherzinger, E. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4604– 4609 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  40. Wyttenbach, A. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2898– 2903 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  41. Klement, I. A. et al. Cell 95, 41–53(1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  42. Saudou, F., Finkbeiner, S., Devys, D. & Greenberg, M. E. Cell 95, 55–66 ( 1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  43. Cummings, C. J. et al. Neuron 24, 879–892 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  44. Cummings, C. J. et al. Nat Genet. 19, 148– 154 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  45. Kobayashi, Y. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8772– 8778 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  46. Faber, P. W., Alter, J. R., MacDonald, M. E. & Hart, A. C. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 179– 184 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  47. Yamamoto, A., Lucas, J. J. & Hen, R. Cell 101, 57–66 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  48. Chai, Y., Koppenhafer, S. L., Bonini, N. M. & Paulson, H. L. J. Neurosci. 19, 10338–10347(1999). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Extra navigation

Subscribe to Nature Cell Biology

Subscribe

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs