BMI1 represses Ink4a/Arf and Hox genes to regulate stem cells in the rodent incisor

Journal name:
Nature Cell Biology
Volume:
15,
Pages:
846–852
Year published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/ncb2766
Received
Accepted
Published online

The polycomb group gene Bmi1 is required for maintenance of adult stem cells in many organs1, 2. Inactivation of Bmi1 leads to impaired stem cell self-renewal due to deregulated gene expression. One critical target of BMI1 is Ink4a/Arf, which encodes the cell-cycle inhibitors p16Ink4a and p19Arf (ref. 3). However, deletion of Ink4a/Arf only partially rescues Bmi1-null phenotypes4, indicating that other important targets of BMI1 exist. Here, using the continuously growing mouse incisor as a model system, we report that Bmi1 is expressed by incisor stem cells and that deletion of Bmi1 resulted in fewer stem cells, perturbed gene expression and defective enamel production. Transcriptional profiling revealed that Hox expression is normally repressed by BMI1 in the adult, and functional assays demonstrated that BMI1-mediated repression of Hox genes preserves the undifferentiated state of stem cells. As Hox gene upregulation has also been reported in other systems when Bmi1 is inactivated1, 2, 5, 6, 7, our findings point to a general mechanism whereby BMI1-mediated repression of Hox genes is required for the maintenance of adult stem cells and for prevention of inappropriate differentiation.

At a glance

Figures

  1. Bmi1-expressing cells in the dental epithelium are stem cells.
    Figure 1: Bmi1-expressing cells in the dental epithelium are stem cells.

    (a) Left, schematic diagram of an adult mandible. The incisor is a long tooth that grows under the molars. Enamel is produced by ameloblasts, which are present only on the labial surface. Dentin, produced by odontoblasts, is deposited on both the labial and lingual surfaces. Di, distal; LiCL, lingual cervical loop; LaCL, labial cervical loop; Pr, proximal. Right, schematic representation of the cell types associated with the dental epithelium and stem cell niche. The arrows in the labial epithelium represent the direction of movement of the cells as they differentiate. Am, ameloblasts. BV, blood vessel; De, dentin; En, enamel; Od, odontoblasts. OEE; outer enamel epithelium; pre-AM, pre-ameloblasts; SR, stellate reticulum; T-A, transit amplifying. (bK5tTA;H2BGFP mice treated for 2 months with doxycycline reveal label retention in the stellate reticulum and OEE of the LaCL. (c) Bmi1GFP expression is localized to the OEE and stellate reticulum of the cervical loop. (dh) Bmi1CreER;R26R-Tm–GFP mice were induced at 6 weeks with tamoxifen and chased for the indicated time period. The dashed lines in bh outline the dental epithelium. Scale bars, 100 μm.

  2. Deletion of Bmi1 affects adult LaCL through both
Ink4a/Arf-dependent and -independent mechanisms.
    Figure 2: Deletion of Bmi1 affects adult LaCL through both Ink4a/Arf-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

    (a,h,o) Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining comparing LaCLs from 5-month-old control (Bmi1+/+), Bmi1−/− and Bmi1−/−;Ink4a/Arf−/− mice. The dashed lines outline the region traced on coronal sections for 3D renderings. The green bar demarcates the width of the cervical loop. (b,i,p) 3D renderings enable reconstruction (recon) of the control, Bmi1−/− and Bmi1−/−;Ink4a/Arf−/− (triple mutant) LaCLs. (c,j,q) E-cadherin staining of the LaCL in control, Bmi1 and triple mutants. E-cadherin expression is downregulated in both the single and triple mutants (open yellow arrowheads) when compared with the control (yellow arrowhead). (d,k,r) The expression level of ITGA6 detected by immunostaining is decreased in the Bmi1−/− and Bmi1−/−;Ink4a/Arf−/− LaCLs (open white arrowheads) when compared with the control (white arrowhead). (e,l,s) P-cadherin expression in the LaCL is expanded in both the Bmi1 and Bmi1−/−;Ink4a/Arf−/− LaCLs (asterisks). (f,m,t) Representative sections of LaCLs from control, Bmi1−/− and Bmi1−/−;Ink4a/Arf−/− jaws. Animals were pulsed with BrdU postnatally and aged 1.5 months for identification of LRCs. (g,n,u) MicroCT scans showing mandibles from 5-month-old control, Bmi1−/− and Bmi1−/−;Ink4a/Arf−/− mice. Enamel is thinner and less mineralized in both single and triple mutants when compared with the control. Insets are coronal sections through the distal root of the second molar (yellow dotted lines) and show that enamel is less mineralized in mutants (open red arrowheads) than in the control (red arrowhead). (v) Quantification of the volume of the LaCL stem cell compartment in control, Bmi1−/− and Bmi1−/−;Ink4a/Arf−/− mice (n = 4 mice for each genotype). (w) Quantification of BrdU LRCs by sectioning and staining through the entire LaCL (n = 5 control, 3 Bmi1−/−, and 4 Bmi1−/−;Ink4a/Arf−/− mice). Error bars indicate means±s.d. *P<0.05, **P<0.001. Scale bars, 100 μm for a,h,o, and 75 μm for cf, jm, and qt. Source data of statistical analyses are shown in Supplementary Tables S2 and S3.

  3. Bmi1 suppresses expression of Ink4a/Arf and Hox genes.
    Figure 3: Bmi1 suppresses expression of Ink4a/Arf and Hox genes.

    (a) Microarray analysis on Bmi1+/+ (control or ctrl) and Bmi1−/− dental epithelia shows that inactivation of Bmi1 leads to de-regulation of Ink4a/Arf (red arrowhead), as well as several Hox genes. Loss of Bmi1 expression is indicated by green arrowheads. (b) PCR with reverse transcription analysis showing upregulation of Hoxa7, b7, and c6 in Bmi1−/− LaCLs. (c) Gene ontology analysis reveals upregulation of genes normally involved in developmental processes and cell differentiation.

  4. Hox gene upregulation contributes to the Bmi1 loss-of-function phenotype.
    Figure 4: Hox gene upregulation contributes to the Bmi1 loss-of-function phenotype.

    (a) Stem cell colonies derived from control LaCLs are composed of small, rounded cells. (b) Deletion of Ink4a/Arf enables colony formation by Bmi1−/− cells, but the cell size is increased. (c) Knockdown of Hoxa9 and Hoxc9 rescues the morphological defects in Bmi1−/−;Ink4a/Arf−/− colonies. (d) Scrambled shRNA does not rescue the phenotype. (e) Overexpression (OE) of Hoxa9 and Hoxc9 in control cells phenocopies the morphology of Bmi1−/−;Ink4a/Arf−/− colonies. The insets in ae are enlarged images of representative cells with a pseudo-coloured cell boundary (red) and DAPI nuclear staining (blue). Schematics represent the level of expression for each gene. (f) Quantification of cell size under different conditions (n = 3 independent experiments with 100 cells scored for each experiment). (gm) Relative expression level by qPCR of Hoxa9, Hoxc9, Cdh1, Cdh3, Itga6, Amtn and Klk4 in cells cultured under different conditions (n = 3independent experiments). Error bars indicate means±s.d. *P<0.05, **P<0.001. Scale bars, 100 μm (ae) and 30 μm (insets). Source data of statistical analyses are shown in Supplementary Tables S4 and S5.

  5. Overexpression of Hoxc9 in LaCLs phenocopies Bmi1 mutants.
    Figure 5: Overexpression of Hoxc9 in LaCLs phenocopies Bmi1 mutants.

    (a,fHoxc9 and YFP Cre-reporter were overexpressed using a Gli1CreER driver in the LaCL by tamoxifen induction, but not in the absence of Cre. YFP expression is shown here 10 days after induction. (b,g) E-cadherin is expressed in stellate reticulum and OEE in the control LaCL (yellow arrowhead) but downregulated in the mutant (open yellow arrowhead). (c,h) ITGA6 is similarly downregulated in the mutant (compare solid and open white arrowheads). (d,i) P-cadherin expression is restricted in the T-A region in the control but expanded in the mutant (asterisk). All LaCLs are outlined by white dashed lines. Scale bar, 75 μm. (e,j,k) 3D reconstruction (recon) of LaCLs shows no difference in LaCL size between control and Gli1CreER/+;R26Hoxc9/YFP (n = 3animals for each genotype). Error bars indicate means±s.d. Source data of statistical analysis are shown in Supplementary Table S2. (l) Model for function of BMI1 in incisor stem cells.

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Molofsky, A. V. et al. Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Nature 425, 962967 (2003).
  2. Park, I. K. et al. Bmi-1 is required for maintenance of adult self-renewing haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 423, 302305 (2003).
  3. Jacobs, J. J., Kieboom, K., Marino, S., DePinho, R. A. & van Lohuizen, M. The oncogene and Polycomb-group gene bmi-1 regulates cell proliferation and senescence through the ink4a locus. Nature 397, 164168 (1999).
  4. Molofsky, A. V., He, S., Bydon, M., Morrison, S. J. & Pardal, R. Bmi-1 promotes neural stem cell self-renewal and neural development but not mouse growth and survival by repressing the p16Ink4a and p19Arf senescence pathways. Genes Dev. 19, 14321437 (2005).
  5. Zacharek, S. J. et al. Lung stem cell self-renewal relies on BMI1-dependent control of expression at imprinted loci. Cell Stem Cell 9, 272281 (2011).
  6. Bruggeman, S. W., Hulsman, D. & van Lohuizen, M. Bmi1 deficient neural stem cells have increased integrin dependent adhesion to self-secreted matrix. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1790, 351360 (2009).
  7. Fasano, C. A. et al. shRNA knockdown of Bmi-1 reveals a critical role for p21-Rb pathway in NSC self-renewal during development. Cell Stem Cell 1, 8799 (2007).
  8. Harada, H. et al. Localization of putative stem cells in dental epithelium and their association with Notch and FGF signaling. J. Cell Biol. 147, 105120 (1999).
  9. Wang, X. P. et al. An integrated gene regulatory network controls stem cell proliferation in teeth. PLoS Biol. 5, 13241333 (2007).
  10. Klein, O. D. et al. An FGF signaling loop sustains the generation of differentiated progeny from stem cells in mouse incisors. Development 135, 377385 (2008).
  11. Smith, C. E. & Warshawsky, H. Cellular renewal in the enamel organ and the odontoblast layer of the rat incisor as followed by radioautography using 3H-thymidine. Anat. Rec. 183, 523561 (1975).
  12. Seidel, K. et al. Hedgehog signaling regulates the generation of ameloblast progenitors in the continuously growing mouse incisor. Development 137, 37533761 (2010).
  13. Juuri, E. et al. Sox2+ stem cells contribute to all epithelial lineages of the tooth via Sfrp5+ progenitors. Dev. Cell 23, 317328 (2012).
  14. Oguro, H. et al. Poised lineage specification in multipotential hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by the polycomb protein Bmi1. Cell Stem Cell 6, 279286 (2010).
  15. Hosen, N. et al. Bmi-1-green fluorescent protein-knock-in mice reveal the dynamic regulation of bmi-1 expression in normal and leukemic hematopoietic cells. Stem Cells 25, 16351644 (2007).
  16. Tumbar, T. et al. Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science 303, 359363 (2004).
  17. Joyner, A. L. & Zervas, M. Genetic inducible fate mapping in mouse: establishing genetic lineages and defining genetic neuroanatomy in the nervous system. Dev. Dyn. 235, 23762385 (2006).
  18. Sangiorgi, E. & Capecchi, M. R. Bmi1 is expressed in vivo in intestinal stem cells. Nat. Genet. 40, 915920 (2008).
  19. Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L. & Luo, L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593605 (2007).
  20. Sangiorgi, E. & Capecchi, M. R. Bmi1 lineage tracing identifies a self-renewing pancreatic acinar cell subpopulation capable of maintaining pancreatic organ homeostasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 71017106 (2009).
  21. Li, C. Y. et al. E-cadherin regulates the behavior and fate of epithelial stem cells and their progeny in the mouse incisor. Dev. Biol. 366, 357366 (2012).
  22. Hwang, W. S. & Tonna, E. A. Autoradiographic analysis of labeling indices and migration rates of cellular component of mouse incisors using tritiated thymidine (H3tdr). J. Dent. Res. 44, 4253 (1965).
  23. Ramalho-Santos, M., Yoon, S., Matsuzaki, Y., Mulligan, R. C. & Melton, D. A. ‘Stemness’: transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells. Science 298, 597600 (2002).
  24. Rock, J. R. et al. Basal cells as stem cells of the mouse trachea and human airway epithelium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1277112775 (2009).
  25. Tani, H., Morris, R. J. & Kaur, P. Enrichment for murine keratinocyte stem cells based on cell surface phenotype. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1096010965 (2000).
  26. Xiong, J., Mrozik, K., Gronthos, S. & Bartold, P. M. Epithelial cell rests of malassez contain unique stem cell populations capable of undergoing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Stem Cells Dev. 21, 20122025 (2012).
  27. Simmer, J. P., Richardson, A. S., Smith, C. E., Hu, Y. & Hu, J. C. Expression of kallikrein-related peptidase 4 in dental and non-dental tissues. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 119, 226233 (2011).
  28. Iwasaki, K. et al. Amelotin–a novel secreted, ameloblast-specific protein. J. Dental Res. 84, 11271132 (2005).
  29. Chavez, M. G. et al. Characterization of dental epithelial stem cells from the mouse incisor with two-dimensional and three-dimensional platforms. Tissue Eng. C 19, 1524 (2013).
  30. Morillo Prado, J. R., Chen, X. & Fuller, M. T. Polycomb group genes Psc and Su(z)2 maintain somatic stem cell identity and activity in Drosophila. PloS ONE 7, e52892 (2012).
  31. Ahn, S. & Joyner, A. L. Dynamic changes in the response of cells to positive hedgehog signaling during mouse limb patterning. Cell 118, 505516 (2004).
  32. Bai, C. B., Auerbach, W., Lee, J. S., Stephen, D. & Joyner, A. L. Gli2, but not Gli1, is required for initial Shh signaling and ectopic activation of the Shh pathway. Development 129, 47534761 (2002).
  33. Diamond, I., Owolabi, T., Marco, M., Lam, C. & Glick, A. Conditional gene expression in the epidermis of transgenic mice using the tetracycline-regulated transactivators tTA and rTA linked to the keratin 5 promoter. J. Invest. Dermatol. 115, 788794 (2000).
  34. Sousa, V. H., Miyoshi, G., Hjerling-Leffler, J., Karayannis, T. & Fishell, G. Characterization of Nkx6-2-derived neocortical interneuron lineages. Cereb. Cortex 19, i1-10 (2009).
  35. Jung, H. et al. Global control of motor neuron topography mediated by the repressive actions of a single hox gene. Neuron 67, 781796 (2010).
  36. Rochat, A., Kobayashi, K. & Barrandon, Y. Location of stem cells of human hair follicles by clonal analysis. Cell 76, 10631073 (1994).
  37. Blanpain, C., Lowry, W. E., Geoghegan, A., Polak, L. & Fuchs, E. Self-renewal, multipotency, and the existence of two cell populations within an epithelial stem cell niche. Cell 118, 635648 (2004).
  38. Barrandon, Y. & Green, H. Three clonal types of keratinocyte with different capacities for multiplication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84, 23022306 (1987).
  39. Bolstad, B. M., Irizarry, R. A., Astrand, M. & Speed, T. P. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19, 185193 (2003).

Download references

Author information

  1. These authors contributed equally to this work

    • Brian Biehs &
    • Jimmy Kuang-Hsien Hu

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orofacial Sciences and Program in Craniofacial and Mesenchymal Biology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA

    • Brian Biehs,
    • Jimmy Kuang-Hsien Hu,
    • Nicolas B. Strauli,
    • Ralf-Peter Heber,
    • Alice F. Goodwin &
    • Ophir D. Klein
  2. Department of Pediatrics and Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA

    • Brian Biehs &
    • Ophir D. Klein
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA

    • Eugenio Sangiorgi &
    • Mario R. Capecchi
  4. Smilow Neuroscience Program, Department of Physiology and Neuroscience, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, NYU School of Medicine, New York, USA

    • Heekyung Jung &
    • Jeremy S. Dasen
  5. Department of Preventative and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA

    • Sunita Ho
  6. Present addresses: Department of Molecular Biology, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California 94080, USA (B.B.); Istituto di Genetica Medica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (E.S.)

    • Brian Biehs &
    • Eugenio Sangiorgi

Contributions

B.B., J.K-H.H., N.B.S., H.J., E.S., R-P.H., A.F.G., J.S.D and O.D.K. designed and performed experiments. B.B., J.K-H.H and O.D.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed results, analysed data and edited the manuscript.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to:

Author details

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. Supplementary Information (804 KB)

    Supplementary Information

Excel files

  1. Supplementary Table 1 (57 KB)

    Supplementary Information

  2. Supplementary Table 2 (28 KB)

    Supplementary Information

  3. Supplementary Table 3 (80 KB)

    Supplementary Information

  4. Supplementary Table 4 (115 KB)

    Supplementary Information

  5. Supplementary Table 5 (197 KB)

    Supplementary Information

  6. Supplementary Table 6 (36 KB)

    Supplementary Information

  7. Supplementary Table 7 (33 KB)

    Supplementary Information

Additional data