Abstract
Substrates of the N-end rule pathway are recognized by the Ubr1 E3 ubiquitin ligase through their destabilizing amino-terminal residues. Our previous work showed that the Ubr1 E3 and the Ufd4 E3 together target an internal degradation signal (degron) of the Mgt1 DNA repair protein. Ufd4 is an E3 enzyme of the ubiquitin-fusion degradation (UFD) pathway that recognizes an N-terminal ubiquitin moiety. Here we show that the RING-type Ubr1 E3 and the HECT-type Ufd4 E3 interact, both physically and functionally. Although Ubr1 can recognize and polyubiquitylate an N-end rule substrate in the absence of Ufd4, the Ubr1–Ufd4 complex is more processive in that it produces a longer substrate-linked polyubiquitin chain. Conversely, Ubr1 can function as a polyubiquitylation-enhancing component of the Ubr1–Ufd4 complex in its targeting of UFD substrates. We also found that Ubr1 can recognize the N-terminal ubiquitin moiety. These and related advances unify two proteolytic systems that have been studied separately for two decades.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachmair, A., Finley, D. & Varshavsky, A. In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science 234, 179–186 (1986).
Varshavsky, A. The N-end rule: functions, mysteries, uses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12142–12149 (1996).
Varshavsky, A. Discovery of cellular regulation by protein degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 34469–34489 (2008).
Ravid, T. & Hochstrasser, M. Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin–proteasome system. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 679–689 (2008).
Turner, G. C., Du, F. & Varshavsky, A. Peptides accelerate their uptake by activating a ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway. Nature 405, 579–583 (2000).
Rao, H., Uhlmann, F., Nasmyth, K. & Varshavsky, A. Degradation of a cohesin subunit by the N-end rule pathway is essential for chromosome stability. Nature 410, 955–960 (2001).
Hu, R.-G. et al. The N-end rule pathway as a nitric oxide sensor controlling the levels of multiple regulators. Nature 437, 981–986 (2005).
Tasaki, T. & Kwon, Y. T. The mammalian N-end rule pathway: new insights into its components and physiological roles. Trends Biochem. Sci. 32, 520–528 (2007).
Mogk, A., Schmidt, R. & Bukau, B. The N-end rule pathway of regulated proteolysis: prokaryotic and eukaryotic strategies. Trends Cell Biol. 17, 165–172 (2007).
Hu, R.-G., Wang, H., Xia, Z. & Varshavsky, A. The N-end rule pathway is a sensor of heme. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 76–81 (2008).
Hwang, C.-S. & Varshavsky, A. Regulation of peptide import through phosphorylation of Ubr1, the ubiquitin ligase of the N-end rule pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19188–19193 (2008).
Hwang, C.-S., Shemorry, A. & Varshavsky, A. Two proteolytic pathways regulate DNA repair by co-targeting the Mgt1 alkyguanine transferase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2142–2147 (2009).
Schmidt, R., Zahn, R., Bukau, B. & Mogk, A. ClpS is the recognition component for Escherichia coli substrates of the N-end rule degradation pathway. Mol. Microbiol. 72, 506–517 (2009).
Román-Hernández, G., Grant, R. A., Sauer, R. T. & Baker, T. A. Molecular basis of substrate selection by the N-end rule adaptor protein ClpS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8888–8893 (2009).
Wang, H., Piatkov, K. I., Brower, C. S. & Varshavsky, A. Glutamine-specific N-terminal amidase, a component of the N-end rule pathway. Mol. Cell 34, 686–695 (2009).
Brower, C. S. & Varshavsky, A. Ablation of arginylation in the mouse N-end rule pathway: loss of fat, higher metabolic rate, damaged spermatogenesis, and neurological perturbations. PLoS ONE 4, e7757 (2009).
Tasaki, T. et al. The substrate recognition domains of the N-end rule pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 1884–1895 (2009).
Hwang, C.-S., Shemorry, A. & Varshavsky, A. N-terminal acetylation of cellular proteins creates specific degradation signals. Science 327, 973–977 (2010).
Liu, F. & Walters, K. J. Multitasking with ubiquitin through multivalent interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 352–360 (2010).
Hochstrasser, M. Origin and function of ubiquitin-like proteins. Nature 458, 422–429 (2009).
Dye, B. T. & Schulman, B. A. Structural mechanisms underlying posttranslational modification by ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 36, 131–150 (2007).
Du, F., Navarro-Garcia, F., Xia, Z., Tasaki, T. & Varshavsky, A. Pairs of dipeptides synergistically activate the binding of substrate by ubiquitin ligase through dissociation of its autoinhibitory domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14110–14115 (2002).
Xia, Z. et al. Substrate-binding sites of UBR1, the ubiquitin ligase of the N-end rule pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 24011–24028 (2008).
Choi, W. S. et al. Structural basis for the recognition of N-end rule substrates by the UBR box of ubiquitin ligases. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1175–1182 (2010).
Matta-Camacho, E., Kozlov, G., Li, F. F. & Gehring, K. Structural basis of substrate recognition and specificity in the N-end rule pathway. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1182–1188 (2010).
Sriram, S. M. & Kwon, Y. T. The structural basis of N-end rule recognition. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1164–1165 (2010).
Xia, Z., Turner, G. C., Hwang, C.-S., Byrd, C. & Varshavsky, A. Amino acids induce peptide uptake via accelerated degradation of CUP9, the transcriptional repressor of the PTR2 peptide transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 28958–28968 (2008).
Heck, J. W., Cheung, S. K. & Hampton, R. Y. Cytoplasmic protein quality control degradation mediated by parallel actions of the E3 ubiquitin ligases Ubr1 and San1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1106–1111 (2010).
Eisele, F. & Wolf, D. H. Degradation of misfolded proteins in the cytoplasm by the ubiquitin ligase Ubr1. FEBS Lett. 582, 4143–4146 (2008).
Prasad, R., Kawaguchi, S. & Ng, D. T. W. A nucleus-based quality control mechanism for cytosolic proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 2117–2127 (2010).
Nillegoda, N. B. et al. Ubr1 and Ubr2 function in a quality control pathway for degradation of unfolded cytosolic proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 2102–2116 (2010).
Kwon, Y. T. et al. An essential role of N-terminal arginylation in cardiovascular development. Science 297, 96–99 (2002).
Cai, H., Kauffman, S., Naider, F. & Becker, J. M. Genomewide screen reveals a wide regulatory network for di/tripeptide utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 172, 1459–1476 (2006).
Graciet, E. & Wellmer, F. The plant N-end rule pathway: structure and functions. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 447–453 (2010).
Kurosaka, S. et al. Arginylation-dependent neural crest cell migration is essential for mouse development. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000878 (2010).
Karakozova, M. et al. Arginylation of β-actin regulates actin cytoskeleton and cell motility. Science 313, 192–196 (2006).
Caprio, M. A., Sambrooks, C. L., Durand, E. S. & Hallak, M. The arginylation-dependent association of calreticulin with stress granules is regulated by calcium. Biochem. J. 429, 63–72 (2010).
Johnson, E. S., Ma, P. C., Ota, I. M. & Varshavsky, A. A proteolytic pathway that recognizes ubiquitin as a degradation signal. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17442–17456 (1995).
Ravid, T. & Hochstrasser, M. Autoregulation of an E2 enzyme by ubiquitin-chain assembly on its catalytic residue. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 422–427 (2007).
Ju, D., Wang, X., Xu, H. & Xie, Y. The armadillo repeats of the Ufd4 ubiquitin ligase recognize ubiquitin-fusion proteins. FEBS Lett. 581, 265–270 (2007).
Xie, Y. & Varshavsky, A. Physical association of ubiquitin ligases and the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2497–2502 (2000).
Xie, Y. & Varshavsky, A. UFD4 lacking the proteasome-binding region catalyses ubiquitination but is impaired in proteolysis. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 1003–1007 (2002).
Kee, Y. & Huibregtse, J. M. Regulation of catalytic activities of HECT ubiquitin ligases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 354, 329–333 (2007).
Johnson, E. S., Bartel, B., W. & Varshavsky, A. Ubiquitin as a degradation signal. EMBO J. 11, 497–505 (1992).
Koegl, M. et al. A novel ubiquitination factor, E4, is involved in multiubiquitin chain assembly. Cell 96, 635–644 (1999).
Xu, P. et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell 137, 133–145 (2009).
Hochstrasser, M. Lingering mysteries of ubiquitin-chain assembly. Cell 124, 27–34 (2006).
Chau, V. et al. A multiubiquitin chain is confined to specific lysine in a targeted short-lived protein. Science 243, 1576–1583 (1989).
Rodrigo-Brenni, M. C. & Morgan, D. O. Sequential E2s drive polyubiquitin chain assembly on APC targets. Cell 130, 127–139 (2007).
Hoppe, T. Multiubiquitylation by E4 enzymes: 'one size' doesn't fit all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30, 183–187 (2005).
Scott, D. C. et al. A dual mechanism for Rub1 ligation to Cdc53. Mol. Cell 39, 784–796 (2010).
Johnsson, N. & Varshavsky, A. Split ubiquitin as a sensor of protein interactions in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10340–10344 (1994).
Möckli, N. et al. Yeast split-ubiquitin-based cytosolic screening system to detect interactions between transcriptionally active proteins. BioTechniques 42, 725–729 (2007).
Varshavsky, A. Ubiquitin fusion technique and related methods . Methods Enzymol. 399, 777–799 (2005).
Catanzariti, A.-M., Soboleva, T. A., Jans, D. A., Board, P. G. & Baker, R. T. An efficient system for high-level expression and easy purification of authentic recombinant proteins. Protein Sci. 13, 1331–1339 (2004).
Saeki, Y., Isono, E. & Toh, E. A. Preparation of ubiquitinated substrates by the PY motif-insertion method for monitoring 26S proteasome activity. Methods Enzymol. 399, 215–227 (2005).
Turner, G. C. & Varshavsky, A. Detecting and measuring cotranslational protein degradation in vivo. Science 289, 2117–2120 (2000).
Liu, C. et al. Ubiquitin chain elongation enzyme Ufd2 regulates a subset of Doa10 substrates. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 10265–10272 (2010).
Tu, D., Li, W., Ye, Y. & Brunger, A. T. Structure and function of the yeast U-box-containing ubiquitin ligase Ufd2p. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15599–15606 (2007).
Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737–741 (2003).
Courbard, J.-R. et al. Interaction between two ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligases of different classes, CBLC and AIP4/ITCH. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 45267–45275 (2002).
Chen, C. et al. The WW domain-containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 upregulates ErbB2 and EGFR through RING finger protein 11. Oncogene 27, 6845–6855 (2008).
Magnifico, A. et al. WW domain HECT E3s target Cbl RING finger E3s for proteasomal degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 43169–43177 (2003).
Zaaroor-Regev, D. et al. Regulation of the polycomb protein Ring1B by self-ubiquitination or by E6-AP may have implications to the pathogenesis of Angelman syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6788–6793 (2010).
Varshavsky, A. Spalog and sequelog: neutral terms for spatial and sequence similarity. Curr. Biol. 14, R181–R183 (2004).
Park, Y., Yoon, S. K. & Yoon, J. B. The HECT domain of TRIP12 ubiquitinates substrates of the ubiquitin fusion degradation pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 1540–1549 (2009).
Gardner, R. G., Nelson, Z. W. & Gottschling, D. E. Degradation-mediated protein quality control in the nucleus. Cell 120, 803–815 (2005).
Longtine, M. S. et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14, 953–961 (1998).
Ausubel, F. M. et al. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Wiley-Interscience, 2006).
Kushnirov, V. V. Rapid and reliable protein extraction from yeast. Yeast 16, 857–860 (2000).
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Jentsch and A. Toh-e for strains and plasmids; the present and former members of the Varshavsky laboratory, particularly J. Sheng and K. Piatkov, for gifts of plasmids and strains; and O. Batygin for technical assistance. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants GM031530, DK039520 and GM085371 (A.V.), and also by grants from the March of Dimes Foundation and the Caltech–City of Hope Biomedical Initiative (A.V.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.-S.H, A.S., D.A. and A.V. designed experiments. C.-S.H. and A.S. performed the experiments. C.-S.H, A.S. and A.V. wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 677 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, CS., Shemorry, A., Auerbach, D. et al. The N-end rule pathway is mediated by a complex of the RING-type Ubr1 and HECT-type Ufd4 ubiquitin ligases. Nat Cell Biol 12, 1177–1185 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2121
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2121
This article is cited by
-
Linking K29-Ub chains to biology
Nature Chemical Biology (2021)
-
Ubr1-mediated ubiquitylation orchestrates asexual development, polar growth, and virulence-related cellular events in Beauveria bassiana
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2021)
-
Alternative cleavage and polyadenylation of genes associated with protein turnover and mitochondrial function are deregulated in Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and ALS disease
BMC Medical Genomics (2019)
-
Molecular basis of GID4-mediated recognition of degrons for the Pro/N-end rule pathway
Nature Chemical Biology (2018)
-
The E3 ligases Itch and WWP2 cooperate to limit TH2 differentiation by enhancing signaling through the TCR
Nature Immunology (2018)