Article


Nature Cell Biology 10, 654 - 664 (2008)
Published online: 11 May 2008 | doi:10.1038/ncb1728

The type I TGF-bold beta receptor is covalently modified and regulated by sumoylation

Jong Seok Kang1, Elise F. Saunier2, Rosemary J. Akhurst2,3,4 & Rik Derynck1,3


Post-translational sumoylation, the covalent attachment of a small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO), regulates the functions of proteins engaged in diverse processes. Often associated with nuclear and perinuclear proteins, such as transcription factors, it is not known whether SUMO can conjugate to cell-surface receptors for growth factors to regulate their functions. Here we show that the type I transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) receptor, TbetaRI, is sumoylated in response to TGF-beta and that its sumoylation requires the kinase activities of both TbetaRI and the type II TGF-beta receptor, TbetaRII. Sumoylation of TbetaRI enhances receptor function by facilitating the recruitment and phosphorylation of Smad3, consequently regulating TGF-beta-induced transcription and growth inhibition. TbetaRI sumoylation modulates the dissemination of transformed cells in a mouse model of TbetaRI-stimulated metastasis. TbetaRI sumoylation therefore controls responsiveness to TGF-beta, with implications for tumour progression. Sumoylation of cell-surface receptors may regulate other growth factor responses.


TGF-beta signalling has key functions in cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, development and tumorigenesis. The mechanisms that lead to receptor activation and gene expression responses to TGF-beta are generally understood1. Binding of TGF-beta to a complex of two type I and two type II kinase receptors, namely TbetaRI and TbetaRII, confers TbetaRI activation and consequent direct carboxy-terminal phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 by TbetaRI. The activated Smads then associate with Smad4 and translocate into the nucleus to regulate transcription of target genes. TGF-beta signalling is modulated by other signalling pathways and post-translational modifications. Indeed, the function of the Smad proteins is controlled by phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitylation and sumoylation2, 3.

Less is known about the regulation of TGF-beta receptors by post-translational modification. Because the receptor complex is a central point for protein interactions, post-translational modifications could have key functions in the transduction of TGF-beta signals. So far, phosphorylation and ubiquitylation have been shown to modify the receptors post-translationally3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Thus, recruitment of E3 ubiquitin ligases, including Smurfs, by the inhibitory Smad6 or Smad7 to the TbetaRII–TbetaRI complex can lead to TbetaRI ubiquitylation and consequent degradation. We now show that SUMO proteins, which primarily modify nuclear proteins and regulate their function, are conjugated to TbetaRI receptors in a regulated manner. TbetaRI sumoylation modulates the function of the TGF-beta receptors and helps define the cellular responses to TGF-beta.

Top

Results

The type I TGF-beta receptor TbetaRI is sumoylated

To examine the sumoylation of TbetaRI or TbetaRII, we expressed Flag-tagged rat TbetaRI or TbetaRII with Myc-tagged SUMO-1. Cell lysate immunoprecipitations with anti-Flag antibodies, followed by western blotting, detected Myc-tagged, sumoylated TGF-beta receptors. As shown in Fig. 1a, SUMO was conjugated to TbetaRI, but not TbetaRII, resulting in a shift of more than 20 kDa, similar to that of other sumoylated proteins, indicating that TbetaRI is post-translationally sumoylated in vivo. TbetaRI sumoylation was increased when the E2-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 was co-expressed with SUMO-1, suggesting that Ubc9 is involved in the sumoylation of TbetaRI (Fig. 1b). Under conditions of Ubc9 overexpression and proportionally insufficient E3 SUMO ligase expression, up to three sumoylated TbetaRI forms were observed. Because only one SUMO-1 can be linked to a Lys residue, we assume that, under these conditions, the initial, site-specific sumoylation can confer additional TbetaRI sumoylation at other sites.

Figure 1: The type I TGF-bold beta receptor Tbold betaRI is sumoylated.

Figure 1 : The type I TGF-|[beta]| receptor T|[beta]|RI is sumoylated.

(a) TbetaRI, but not TbetaRII, is sumoylated. Lysates of COS cells, expressing Flag-tagged (F-) TbetaRI or TbetaRII and Myc-tagged (M-) SUMO-1, were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-Flag antibody, followed by western blotting (WB) with anti-Myc to detect sumoylated TGF-beta receptors. (b) Increasing expression of Ubc9 enhances TbetaRI sumoylation. COS cells, expressing Flag-tagged TbetaRI, Myc-tagged SUMO-1 and increasing levels of Ubc9, were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation, followed by western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (c) In vitro sumoylation of TbetaRI. Immunopurified Flag-tagged TbetaRI was incubated with or without recombinant SUMO-1, the E1 enzyme Aos1/Uba2 and the E2-conjugating enzyme Ubc9. The reaction mixture was analysed by western blotting with anti-Flag antibody. (d) TGF-beta induces sumoylation of endogenous TbetaRI. Lysates of Mv1Lu or MDA-231 cells, treated with or without TGF-beta, were immunoprecipitated with anti-TbetaRI and immunoblotted with antibody against SUMO-1. (e) TbetaRI, but not other type I receptors, is sumoylated. 293T cells, ectopically expressing the indicated type I receptor, Myc-tagged SUMO-1 and Ubc9, were lysed, and sumoylation was analysed by western blotting.

Full size image (65 KB)

We next evaluated whether TbetaRI can be sumoylated in vitro. Immunopurified TbetaRI was incubated with SUMO-1, the E1 activating SUMO enzyme, Aos1/Uba2, and Ubc9 in the presence of ATP. Western blotting detected a band with a size that was compatible with the attachment of a SUMO-1 protein to TbetaRI and corresponded to the sumoylated TbetaRI in vivo. When the E1 or E2 enzyme, or SUMO-1, was absent, this band was not detected (Fig. 1c). This result suggests that TbetaRI was sumoylated in vitro.

Immunoprecipitation of TbetaRI from Mv1Lu or MDA-231 cells, treated with or without TGF-beta, and immunoblotting with antibodies against SUMO-1, revealed that endogenous TbetaRI was sumoylated and that TGF-beta induced TbetaRI sumoylation (Fig. 1d). These data indicate that receptor activation by TGF-beta may induce sumoylation of TbetaRI.

We assessed whether other type I TGF-beta family receptors could be sumoylated. Each type I receptor was expressed in the presence or absence of SUMO-1 and Ubc9, and sumoylation was analysed by immunoblotting. Whereas TbetaRI was sumoylated, other type I receptors were not (Fig. 1e).

TbetaRI kinase activity and phosphorylation are required for sumoylation of the TbetaRI receptor

To further characterize whether activation of TbetaRI affects its sumoylation, as apparent by the TGF-beta-induced TbetaRI sumoylation (Fig. 1d), we compared the in vitro sumoylation efficacy of immunopurified wild-type TbetaRI and activated TbetaRI (caTbetaRI) with a Thr 202 to Asp mutation (Thr 202 in rat TbetaRI corresponds to Thr 204 in human TbetaRI), resulting in elevated kinase activity8. As shown in Fig. 2a, caTbetaRI was sumoylated much more efficiently than wild-type TbetaRI, suggesting that TbetaRI activation, which normally occurs by TbetaRII-mediated phosphorylation in response to TGF-beta, facilitates sumoylation of the receptor.

Figure 2: The kinase activities of Tbold betaRI and Tbold betaRII are required for Tbold betaRI sumoylation.

Figure 2 : The kinase activities of T|[beta]|RI and T|[beta]|RII are required for T|[beta]|RI sumoylation.

(a) Activated TbetaRI is more sumoylated than wild-type TbetaRI. In vitro sumoylation of immunopurified Flag-tagged wild-type and activated (ca) TbetaRI in the presence or absence of recombinant SUMO-1, Aos1/Uba2 (E1), and Ubc9. The reaction mixture was analysed by western blotting for TbetaRI. (b) Effects of the TbetaRI kinase inhibitor and TbetaRI dephosphorylation on TbetaRI sumoylation. In vitro sumoylation was performed as in a with wild-type or activated (ca) TbetaRI, as indicated, in the presence or absence of the TbetaRI kinase inhibitor SB431542. The phosphates were removed from TbetaRI with lambda phosphatase before in vitro sumoylation. (c) The kinase activities of TbetaRII and TbetaRI are required for efficient TbetaRI sumoylation. 293T cells co-expressed a cytoplasmic receptor chimaera TbetaRII-RI, in which the TbetaRI cytoplasmic domain follows the TbetaRII cytoplasmic domain, or chimaeras in which the TbetaRII and/or TbetaRI kinase activities were inactivated by point mutation (KR), with Myc-tagged (M-) SUMO-1 and Ubc9. Sumoylation of the chimaera was analysed by western blotting. (d) In vitro sumoylation of immunopurified cytoplasmic receptor chimaeras or each of the kinase-defective receptor chimaeras, used in c. (e) Diagram showing TGF-beta-induced sumoylation of TbetaRI in the receptor complex.

Full size image (70 KB)

Because the activated TbetaRI has elevated kinase activity and increased phosphorylation8, we examined whether increased TbetaRI sumoylation resulted from increased TbetaRI kinase activity or phosphorylation. In vitro sumoylation of wild-type TbetaRI or caTbetaRI was decreased in the presence of SB431542, a specific TbetaRI kinase inhibitor, although this was more easily detected with caTbetaRI (Fig. 2b). These data suggested that the TbetaRI kinase regulates TbetaRI sumoylation. Because TbetaRI did not phosphorylate SUMO-1, the E1 enzyme (Aos/Uba2) and Ubc9 (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1a), these data suggested that TbetaRI autophosphorylation has a role in its sumoylation. To determine whether TbetaRI phosphorylation regulates TbetaRI sumoylation, we removed the Ser/Thr phosphorylation from TbetaRI by using lambda phosphatase before in vitro sumoylation. The absence or decrease of TbetaRI phosphorylation decreased the sumoylation of wild-type or activated TbetaRI (Fig. 2b). This again was more easily detected with activated TbetaRI than with wild-type TbetaRI, as a result of the difference in sumoylation level. These results suggest that increased kinase activity together with increased phosphorylation contribute remarkably to the efficiency of TbetaRI sumoylation.

TGF-beta binding to TbetaRII results in stable complex formation of two TbetaRII and two TbetaRI receptors, in which TbetaRII phosphorylates the TbetaRI cytoplasmic domain and thereby activates the TbetaRI kinase1. The activated receptor complex permits autophosphorylation of the TbetaRII and TbetaRI dimers. To determine the roles of the TbetaRII and TbetaRI kinases in TbetaRI sumoylation, we used a cytoplasmic chimaera that fused the TbetaRI cytoplasmic domain to the TbetaRII cytoplasmic domain9. In this complex, the TbetaRII kinase activates the TbetaRI kinase without the need to add TGF-beta. The receptor chimaera, expressed in the presence of SUMO and Ubc9, was sumoylated. Because TbetaRII is not sumoylated (Fig. 1a), the sumoylation site is within the TbetaRI cytoplasmic domain. Inactivation of the TbetaRI kinase by Lys 230 to Arg mutation decreased the chimaera sumoylation (Fig. 2c), which was consistent with the decreased TbetaRI sumoylation in the presence of SB431542 (Fig. 2b). Similar inactivation of the TbetaRII kinase by Lys 277 to Arg mutation also decreased sumoylation of the chimaera in comparison with the wild-type, kinase-active version (Fig. 2c). Because the TbetaRII cytoplasmic domain is not targeted for sumoylation, this result indicates that phosphorylation of the TbetaRI cytoplasmic domain by the TbetaRII kinase is important in the sumoylation of TbetaRI. Mutation of both kinase ATP-binding sites in the chimaera blocked sumoylation.

The requirement for both receptor kinase activities for sumoylation was also studied in vitro. The efficacies of in vitro sumoylation of wild-type, TbetaRI kinase-defective, TbetaRII kinase-defective and TbetaRI/II kinase-defective chimaeras, immunopurified from transfected cells, were compared (Fig. 2d). Inactivation of the kinase functions of TbetaRII or TbetaRI strongly decreased the sumoylation in vitro, whereas inactivation of both kinases abolished sumoylation of the chimaera (Fig. 2d).

These observations indicate that the kinase activities of both TbetaRI and TbetaRII, and the consequent phosphorylation of TbetaRI, are required for efficient TGF-beta-induced sumoylation of TbetaRI in the receptor complex. This is consistent with the TGF-beta-induced phosphorylation and consequent activation of TbetaRI by TbetaRII (Fig. 2e).

The TbetaRI receptor is sumoylated on Lys 389

Sumoylation often occurs on a lysine residue (K) within a consensus sequence PsiKx(D/E), in which Psi represents a large hydrophobic residue10. Because this consensus sequence is absent from the amino-acid sequence of TbetaRI, each of the 20 lysine residues in the cytoplasmic domain was singly replaced by arginine, and the effect of each mutation on TbetaRI sumoylation was tested. Lysates of cells co-expressing each Flag-tagged lysine mutant of TbetaRI with SUMO-1 and Ubc9 were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag antibody, followed by western blotting. TbetaRI was not sumoylated when Lys 389 was replaced by arginine, whereas replacements of other lysine residues by arginine did not affect the sumoylation of TbetaRI (Fig. 3a, and data not shown), indicating that Lys 389 is a major site for TbetaRI sumoylation. The Lys 389 mutation also affected in vitro sumoylation, because no sumoylated TbetaRI was detected when Lys 389 was replaced by arginine (Fig. 3b). These results indicate that Lys 389 is the only residue targeted for sumoylation.

Figure 3: The Tbold betaRI receptor is sumoylated on Lys 389.

Figure 3 : The T|[beta]|RI receptor is sumoylated on Lys 389.

(a) Mutation of Lys 389 abolishes TbetaRI sumoylation. 293T cells expressed Flag-tagged wild-type (WT) or mutant TbetaRI with the indicated lysine-to-arginine mutation, with Myc-tagged SUMO-1 and Ubc9. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag antibody, followed by western blotting for SUMO-1. (b) In vitro sumoylation of wild-type TbetaRI or K389R TbetaRI. Immunopurified TbetaRI was subjected to in vitro sumoylation followed by immunoblotting to detect sumoylation. (c) Proposed structure of the TbetaRI cytoplasmic domain. The Lys 389, L45 loop, GS region and ATP-binding site are indicated. N and C indicate the N and C termini. (d) Sequence alignment of the TbetaRI sequence containing Lys 389 and corresponding regions of other type I receptors.

Full size image (85 KB)

The proposed structure of the TbetaRI cytoplasmic domain (Fig. 3c) predicts that Lys 389 is located in the hinge between the alphaEF helix and the alphaF helix, and is exposed at the surface of the C lobe of the kinase domain. The sumoylation site faces the same orientation as the GS region, which is phosphorylated by TbetaRII on the binding of TGF-beta, and the L45 loop, which specifies the interaction with Smad, although in a separate protein domain. The GS region and L45 loop, both located in the N lobe, interact with the Smad for phosphorylation by TbetaRI. The exposure of Lys 389 at the protein surface predicts that conjugation with SUMO strongly affects the cytosolic surface of TbetaRI and may regulate the binding of Smad to the L45 loop and GS domain of TbetaRI, and interactions of additional proteins with the receptor complex.

Sequence comparisons (Fig. 3d) show that Lys 389 is not conserved in other TGF-beta-family type I receptors, with the exception of the activin receptor ActRIB/ALK-4. This is consistent with the absence of sumoylation of these type I receptors in vivo (Fig. 1e). The lack of ActRIB/ALK-4 sumoylation suggests that other determinants besides the target lysine are needed for sumoylation of TbetaRI. It is unlikely that this is due to the serine versus threonine difference, four residues preceding the sumoylated lysine residue in TbetaRI compared with ActRIB/ALK-4 (Fig. 3d), because S385T replacement did not affect the in vitro sumoylation of TbetaRI (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1b).

TbetaRI sumoylation regulates Smad interaction and activation

To evaluate whether sumoylation of the exposed Lys 389 affects Smad activation, we examined the interaction of Smad3 with caTbetaRI. Because this interaction is hard to detect by immunoprecipitation, probably as a result of its low affinity and transient nature, we examined the interaction of the Smad3D407E mutant with caTbetaRI. The D407E mutation in the MH2 domain was identified in Smad2 in colorectal carcinoma, and affects the interaction of Smad with TbetaRI and heteromerization with Smad4 (ref. 11). Increased caTbetaRI sumoylation by co-expressing Ubc9 and SUMO-1 enhanced the interaction of TbetaRI with Smad3D407E. In contrast, coexpression of SUMO and Ubc9 did not enhance the interaction of Smad3D407E with caTbetaRI carrying the sumoylation-resistant K389R mutation (Fig. 4a). We also incubated immobilized glutathione S-transferase (GST)–Smad3D407E with a mixture of sumoylated and unsumoylated TbetaRI. Western blotting of purified GST–Smad3–TbetaRI complexes showed preferential binding of Smad3 to sumoylated TbetaRI, in comparison with unsumoylated TbetaRI, even though the latter was in large excess (Fig. 4b). This result, together with the data in Fig. 4a, indicates that sumoylation of TbetaRI enhances Smad3 recruitment and suggests that TbetaRI sumoylation enhances Smad activation.

Figure 4: Tbold betaRI sumoylation regulates Smad activation and TGF-bold beta responses.

Figure 4 : T|[beta]|RI sumoylation regulates Smad activation and TGF-|[beta]| responses.

(a) Interaction of Smad3 with TbetaRI. Activated (ca) TbetaRI or its K389R mutant were coexpressed with Myc-tagged (M-) SUMO-1 and Ubc9, and/or Smad3D407E in 293T cells. The lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation, and analysed by western blotting. (b) In vitro interaction of Smad3 with TbetaRI. Immobilized GST or GST–Smad3(D407E) were incubated with in vitro sumoylated and non-sumoylated Flag-tagged TbetaRI. Adsorbed proteins were subjected to western blotting for TbetaRI. The lower panel shows Coomassie blue staining of GST and GST–Smad3(D407E) used for the adsorption. (c) The indicated fibroblasts were subjected to western blotting to assess the expression of TbetaRI. (d) Biotin-labelled cell-surface proteins from the indicated MEFs were subjected to avidin precipitation, followed by western blotting to assess the cell-surface expression levels of TbetaRI. (e) Wild-type and K389R TbetaRI have similar kinase activities. TbetaRI, immunopurified from transfected 293T cells, was subjected to kinase reactions without or with TbetaRI kinase inhibitor. (f, g) Lack of TbetaRI sumoylation confers a lower level of Smad3 (f) or Smad2 (g) activation. Tgfbr1- /- fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type or K389R TbetaRI were treated without or with TGF-beta for the indicated time. Cell lysates were analysed by western blotting. (h) Lack of TbetaRI sumoylation decreases Smad3-mediated transcription. Tgfbr1- /- fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type TbetaRI or K389R mutant TbetaRI were transfected with the Smad3-responsive (CAGA)12-luciferase reporter. Luciferase activities were measured. The error bars represent s.d. (n = 2) (i) Lack of TbetaRI sumoylation decreases TGF-beta-induced endogenous gene expression. Tgfbr1- /- fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type TbetaRI or K389R mutant TbetaRI were treated without or with TGF-beta. Smad7 mRNA was quantified with real-time PCR. The error bars represent s.d. (n = 3) (j) Lack of TbetaRI sumoylation decreases TGF-beta-induced growth inhibition. Tgfbr1- /- fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type or K389R TbetaRI, or with an empty vector, were cultured without or with the indicated dose of TGF-beta for 3 days. The cells were then counted. The error bars represent s.d. (n = 3). Uncropped images of blots in a and f are shown in Supplementary Information, Fig. S4.

Full size image (102 KB)

Because TbetaRI phosphorylates Smad2 and Smad3 after the binding of TGF-beta, we investigated whether sumoylation of activated TbetaRI affects Smad3 phosphorylation. TbetaRI-defective mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from Tgfbr1- /- mice12 were retrovirally infected to express wild-type TbetaRI or sumoylation-resistant K389R TbetaRI. Stably selected cell populations, expressing either TbetaRI form at equal levels (Fig. 4c), showed equivalent cell-surface levels of wild-type or mutant TbetaRI (Fig. 4d), suggesting that the K389R mutation did not affect cell-surface transport or stability of TbetaRI. K389R TbetaRI also showed a similar phosphorylation level to that of wild-type TbetaRI, resulting primarily from the TbetaRI kinase activity, because SB431542 abolished this phosphorylation (Fig. 4e). Fractionation of cell lysates did not reveal differences in subcellular compartmentalization of wild-type versus mutant TbetaRI (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1c). We then compared wild-type and K389R TbetaRI for their ability to phosphorylate Smad3 in response to TGF-beta. In fibroblasts expressing wild-type TbetaRI, TGF-beta induced Smad3 phosphorylation within 15 min, whereas, in cells expressing K389R TbetaRI, the Smad3 phosphorylation kinetics in response to TGF-beta was slower, with first detection at 30 min. Furthermore, the overall level of Smad3 activation was lower in cells expressing K389R TbetaRI than in cells expressing wild-type TbetaRI (Fig. 4f). Similar results were seen with TGF-beta-induced activation of Smad2 (Fig. 4g). Replacement of Lys 393 in ActRIB/ALK-4, which is not sumoylated and corresponds to Lys 389 in TbetaRI, with arginine did not affect Smad3 activation (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1d).

The differences in level and kinetics of Smad2 and Smad3 phosphorylation by wild-type versus K389R TbetaRI, together with the results of the interaction of Smad3 with TbetaRI, suggest that TbetaRI sumoylation enhances the Smad interaction with TbetaRI, allowing more efficient phosphorylation and activation of Smad2/3 in response to TGF-beta.

TbetaRI sumoylation regulates functional responses to TGF-beta

Using Tgfbr1- /- fibroblasts ectopically expressing wild-type or K389R TbetaRI, we characterized the effect of TbetaRI sumoylation on Smad-mediated transcription; that is, the functional consequence of Smad activation. We used a reporter in which tandem Smad-binding sites control luciferase transcription. Cells expressing K389R TbetaRI showed decreased transcription from the Smad3-responsive promoter compared with cells expressing wild-type TbetaRI (Fig. 4h). We also compared the endogenous expression of the TGF-beta-responsive Smad7 gene by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR). Cells expressing K389R TbetaRI showed decreased expression of Smad7 messenger RNA in response to TGF-beta, compared with cells expressing wild-type TbetaRI (Fig. 4i). Similar results were obtained with two additional populations of Tgfbr1- /- fibroblasts ectopically expressing TbetaRI or K389R TbetaRI at similar levels (Supplementary Information, Fig. S2). These results suggest that TbetaRI sumoylation defines the TGF-beta-induced transcriptional regulation.

We also examined the contribution of TbetaRI sumoylation to the antiproliferative response to TGF-beta. We seeded the fibroblasts expressing wild-type or K389R TbetaRI in parallel with the parental Tgfbr1- /- cells as control cells, and determined the proliferative response after adding TGF-beta. Cells lacking TbetaRI were not affected in their proliferation by TGF-beta, whereas those expressing wild-type TbetaRI responded with decreased proliferation, as assessed by cell number (Fig. 4j). In contrast with wild-type TbetaRI, cells expressing K389R TbetaRI showed a decreased growth inhibitory response to TGF-beta. This result suggests that sumoylation regulates the TbetaRI-mediated antiproliferative response to TGF-beta and renders the cells more responsive to TGF-beta.

TbetaRI sumoylation enhances invasion and metastasis of Ras-transformed cells

Because autocrine TGF-beta signalling regulates cancer progression13, 14 we postulated that resistance to sumoylation, while suppressing TGF-beta growth inhibitory activities, affects tumour progression. To address this issue, the Tgfbr1- /- fibroblasts, carrying a control empty vector or ectopically expressing wild-type or K389R TbetaRI at similar levels, were transduced with a control vector or a vector expressing activated Ha-Ras (Leu 61) to generate tumorigenic cell populations. Mutant Ras was expressed and activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) MAP kinase to similar extents in all three Ras-transformed cell populations (Fig. 5a). Cells expressing activated Ras had a transformed phenotype, which was apparent from the altered cell morphology and loss of contact inhibition (data not shown).

Figure 5: Lack of Tbold betaRI sumoylation decreases TGF-bold beta-regulated invasion and metastasis.

Figure 5 : Lack of T|[beta]|RI sumoylation decreases TGF-|[beta]|-regulated invasion and metastasis.

(a) Ras-transformed Tgfbr1- /- fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type or K389R TbetaRI, or with an empty vector, were subjected to western blotting for TbetaRI, Ras or phospho-ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) as a marker of Ras activation. (b, c) TbetaRI-mediated TGF-beta responsiveness of Ras-transformed cells promotes invasion, which is decreased by lack of TbetaRI sumoylation. Cells were seeded on a Matrigel-coated Transwell filter and incubated for 24 h to allow invasion towards 10% serum. Cells that migrated through the filter were stained with crystal violet. The white stipples indicate the pores in the filter. A representative picture and quantification of invaded cells are shown in b and c, respectively. Error bars represent s.d. (n = 4) (d, e) Ras-transformed Tgfbr1- /- fibroblasts expressing wild-type or K389R TbetaRI, or with an empty vector, were injected into the tail vein of nude mice. The lung tumour nodules were counted after 3 weeks. (d) Representative pictures of lungs from mice with Ras-transformed MEFs are shown in the upper panels, and corresponding haematoxylin/eosin-stained sections of tumour nodules at the same magnification (times10 objective) are shown in the lower panels. (e) Quantification of tumour nodules in the lungs. Error bars represent s.e.m. (n = 6). The single and double asterisks indicate P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively, compared with wild-type TbetaRI.

Full size image (88 KB)

We examined the invasion of the Ras-transformed cells by using a modified Boyden chamber assay in which cells migrate through Matrigel towards serum. Ras-transformed Tgfbr1- /- cells ectopically expressing wild-type TbetaRI showed a higher invasion activity than Ras-transformed Tgfbr1- /- cells lacking TbetaRI (Fig. 5b), indicating that the invasive capacity of Ras-transformed MEFs depends on TbetaRI signalling. Ras-transformed Tgfbr1- /- MEFs expressing K389R TbetaRI were less invasive than cells expressing wild-type TbetaRI, indicating that, in this system, lack of TbetaRI sumoylation impairs the TbetaRI-dependent invasion of transformed cells (Fig. 5b, c). These observations are consistent with the role of sumoylation of TbetaRI in TGF-beta-induced gene expression and growth inhibition (Fig. 4h–j).

Metastasis is a complex process, requiring cell growth, migration, invasion, intravasation and extravasation, and cell survival in the circulatory system and at the metastatic site. Using a mouse tail-vein injection model, autocrine TGF-beta signalling was shown to enhance the ability of tumour cells to establish metastatic nodules within the lung15, 16. To determine the roles of TbetaRI and sumoylation of TbetaRI in the formation of metastatic nodules in this model, we compared the ability of the Tgfbr1- /- MEF derivatives to colonize the lung. Colonization of the lungs by MEFs was fully dependent on expression of activated Ha-Ras (Fig. 5d, e; data not shown). Ras-transformed Tgfbr1- /- cells gave rise to only few very small lung tumour nodules (Fig. 5d, e). Tumour cells were proliferative with a high incidence of apoptosis (Supplementary Information, Fig. S3h). The tumours were morphologically heterogeneous, and large cells with massive nuclei were indicative of chromosomal instability (Supplementary Information, Fig. S3e). Remarkably, Ras-transformed Tgfbr1- /- cells ectopically expressing wild-type or K389R TbetaRI developed numerous large metastatic nodules (Fig. 5d, e). MEFs expressing sumoylation-defective TbetaRI gave rise to fewer tumour nodules than cells expressing the wild-type receptor (Fig. 5e). These nodules were generally smaller than those from wild-type MEFs expressing TbetaRI (Fig. 5d, and data not shown), although their histological appearance (Fig. 5d) and proliferative rates (Supplementary Information, Fig. S3a) were similar. These results suggest that, in this model of TGF-beta-mediated metastasis, TbetaRI sumoylation contributes to tumour progression by enhancing tumour cell extravasation, survival and/or growth at the metastatic site.

The Ser385Tyr mutation of TbetaRI, implicated in metastatic cancer, confers sumoylation resistance

Mutations in TGF-beta signalling mediators, including TGFBR1, have been associated with human cancers13. Among these, a missense mutation, S387Y, in TGFBR1 was enriched in breast and head-and-neck cancer metastases, in comparison with corresponding primary tumours17, 18. This mutation confers diminished TGF-beta signalling and is the only mutation in TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 known to associate specifically with tumour metastases17. Because the corresponding residue in rat TbetaRI, namely Ser 385, localizes close to the Lys 389 sumoylation site of TbetaRI (Fig. 6a), we examined whether rat S385Y TbetaRI was sumoylated. In contrast with wild-type TbetaRI, this mutant was not sumoylated in cells overexpressing SUMO-1 and Ubc9 (Fig. 6b). In vitro, replacement of Ser 385 with Tyr (Fig. 6c) or Ala (Fig. 6d) also strongly decreased sumoylation. In contrast, replacement of Ser 385 with Thr, which may, similarly to Ser, be targeted for phosphorylation by Ser/Thr kinases, did not affect sumoylation (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1b). These results indicate that this single amino-acid substitution prevents TbetaRI sumoylation.

Figure 6: The Ser385Tyr mutation impairs Tbold betaRI sumoylation and function.

Figure 6 : The Ser385Tyr mutation impairs T|[beta]|RI sumoylation and function.

(a, b) Ser385Tyr TbetaRI is not sumoylated. (a) The rat TbetaRI sequence is shown with Lys 389 as sumoylation site four amino-acid residues away from Ser 385, which is equivalent to Ser 387 in human TbetaRI. (b) 293T cells co-expressing wild-type, K389R or S385Y TbetaRI, with Myc-tagged (M-) SUMO-1 and Ubc9, were lysed and analysed by western blotting to detect sumoylation. (c, d) In vitro sumoylation of S385Y mutant TbetaRI (c) or S385A TbetaRI (d) in comparison with wild-type TbetaRI. Immunopurified TbetaRI was subjected to in vitro sumoylation followed by immunoblotting to detect sumoylation. (e) Tgfbr1- /- fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type, K389R or S385Y TbetaRI were transfected with the Smad3-responsive (CAGA)12-luciferase reporter. Luciferase activities without or in response to added TGF-beta were measured. Error bars represent s.d. (n = 3). (f) Representative pictures of lungs from mice with Ras-transformed MEFs are shown in upper panels, and corresponding haematoxylin/eosin-stained sections of tumour nodules at the same magnification (times10 objective) are shown in the lower panels. (g) Quantification of tumour nodules in the lungs. Error bars represent s.e.m. (n = 6). Double asterisk indicates P < 0.01 compared with wild-type TbetaRI.

Full size image (82 KB)

We examined whether the S385Y mutation decreased the responsiveness to TGF-beta, as observed with the sumoylation-defective K389R TbetaRI (Fig. 4). Using the Smad3-responsive reporter of Fig. 4h, cells expressing S385Y TbetaRI responded to TGF-beta with a lower level of transcription than cells expressing wild-type TbetaRI, but a higher level than cells expressing K389R TbetaRI (Fig. 6e), indicating that the decreased TGF-beta responsiveness associated with S385Y TbetaRI correlates with impaired TbetaRI sumoylation. We also evaluated the S385Y TbetaRI mutation in the lung colonization tumour model. Ras-transformed MEFs expressing S385Y TbetaRI formed fewer and smaller metastatic nodules than cells expressing wild-type TbetaRI (Fig. 6f, g). Although this difference in tumour nodule formation is qualitatively comparable to that of K389R TbetaRI cells, the efficiency of metastatic nodule formation was more impaired in S385Y TbetaRI cells than in K389R TbetaRI cells. This quantitative difference between cells expressing K389R TbetaRI or S385Y TbetaRI, when compared with their differential activities in transcription assays, raises the possibility that the impaired TbetaRI sumoylation resulting from the S385Y mutation may be complemented with an additional defect of relevance to cancer progression.

Top

Discussion

Here we provide evidence that a cell-surface polypeptide growth factor receptor is modified by sumoylation in a regulated, ligand-dependent manner. Conjugation of SUMO to TbetaRI depends on TbetaRI activation by phosphorylation, which in turn is induced by the binding of TGF-beta to the TbetaRII–TbetaRI complex. TGF-beta receptor sumoylation enhances the recruitment and activation of Smad3, and consequently regulates TGF-beta responses.

Little is known about the sumoylation of transmembrane proteins and how this affects their function. The ion channel proteins K2P1 and Kv1.5 are sumoylated, and this modification regulates their inactivation19, 20. Sumoylation of the kainate receptor subunit GluR6 is increased in response to kainate and enhances endocytosis, resulting in a negative effect on synaptic transmission21. This raises the possibility that TbetaRI sumoylation affects the internalization, recycling and/or stability of receptors.

Interplay between different modifications provides a mechanism for regulating protein function. For example, phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation and ubiquitylation of histone H3 and H4 amino-terminal sequences affect each other to control gene expression22. Stress-induced N-terminal phosphorylation of p53 regulates its C-terminal acetylation23. In addition, Smad7 acetylation inhibits its ubiquitylation24. Here we show interplay between phosphorylation and sumoylation in regulating TbetaRI function. Thus, TGF-beta-induced phosphorylation of TbetaRI by itself and TbetaRII is required for the sumoylation of TbetaRI to regulate its function. Phosphorylation-dependent sumoylation has been observed in transcription regulators, such as heat-shock factors, GATA-1 and MEF-2, and was shown to involve a PsiKxExxSP motif25. Within this motif, serine phosphorylation was suggested to contribute to sumoylation of lysine. Although TbetaRI lacks this motif, the dependence of TbetaRI sumoylation on phosphorylation is consistent with the requirements of the kinase activities of the receptor complex, and consequent TbetaRI phosphorylation, for TbetaRI sumoylation. How TbetaRI phosphorylation augments sumoylation remains to be determined.

TbetaRI sumoylation provides a new mechanism for the functional regulation of TGF-beta responses. By regulating Smad activation and downstream transcription responses, TbetaRI sumoylation may elaborate the TGF-beta responses that drive cancer progression. Indeed, sumoylation is thought to be important in tumorigenesis because some oncogene proteins and tumour suppressors26, 27, 28, 29 are sumoylated. In addition, sumoylation of the reptin chromatin complex regulates the KAI1 metastasis suppressor gene and the invasive activity of cancer cells30. We here provide independent data to link sumoylation with tumour progression. Increased TGF-beta1 expression by tumour cells and their microenvironment, and increased TGF-beta signalling within tumour cells, are thought to be important factors in cancer progression16, 18. In a model of TGF-beta-dependent metastasis of cancer cells to the lung, TbetaRI sumoylation enhanced tumorigenesis.

The proposed association of a sumoylation-resistant TbetaRI mutant with breast cancer metastasis14 seems at odds with our in vivo results with Ras-transformed Tgfbr1- /- fibroblasts. Differences in cellular origin of the tumours (highly malignant epithelial cells versus diploid embryonic fibroblasts31) and the use of an immune-incompetent mouse model that addresses only a few components of the metastatic process may explain this discrepancy. In comparison with MEFs, human metastatic tumours bear multiple mutations32; these tumours have elevated levels of sumoylating enzymes and diminished levels of desumoylating enzymes30. Thus, there may be a metastatic advantage to mutating the TbetaRI sumoylation site to prevent overactivation of the receptor. Retention of functional TGF-beta receptors is advantageous to the spread of metastatic tumours15; thus, human tumours with homozygous deletion of TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 are rare13, 14 and present a better prognosis for patient survival13, 14. Mutation of the sumoylation site might more subtly alter TbetaRI activity, modulating a mechanism that contributes to metastasis while retaining enough TbetaRI activity for the intravasation and extravasation of tumour cells. Overall, though, along with a previous report30, our data suggest a connection between sumoylation and cancer progression.

Top

Methods

Plasmids.

The expression plasmids for N-terminally Flag-tagged or Myc-tagged SUMO-1, or Ubc9 or C-terminally Flag-tagged TbetaRI have been described33, 34. The expression plasmid for the Flag-tagged TbetaRII–TbetaRI cytoplasmic chimaera has also been described9. Site-directed mutagenesis with the QuikChange kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) generated plasmids encoding C-terminally Flag-tagged TbetaRI or TbetaRII–TbetaRI cytoplasmic chimaeras with amino-acid substitutions, and mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing. To generate retroviral vectors expressing Flag-tagged TbetaRI, the coding region was inserted into the HpaI site of LNCX35. The retroviral vector pBABE-H-Ras(Leu 61)-IRES-Puro36 was provided by R. Davis (University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA). The expression plamid for Myc-tagged Smad3(D407E)11 was provided by K. Miyazono (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan). Expression plasmids for haemagglutinin (HA)-tagged ALK-1, ALK-3 or ALK-6 were generated by subcloning the coding regions from pcDNA3-HA-ALK1, pcDNA3-HA-ALK3 and pcDNA3-HA-ALK6 (refs 37, 38), provided by P. ten Dijke (University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands), into the EcoRI/XhoI site of pRK5. A plasmid encoding Flag-tagged ALK-2 was made by inserting the coding region from pRK5-Myc-ALK2 into the EcoRI/SalI site of pXFIF39. To generate a plasmid encoding Flag-tagged ALK-4, the coding region from pcDNA1-hALK4 (ref. 37), provided by C. H. Heldin (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Uppsala, Sweden) was amplified by PCR and inserted into the EcoRI/SalI site of pRK5 (ref. 40). The reporter plasmid (CAGA)12-luciferase41 was also provided by P. ten Dijke.

Cell culture and transfections.

Tgfbr1- /- MEFs12 were provided by S. Karlsson (Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden), immortalized and cultured in DMEM medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were plated at 2 times 105 cells per well in six-well plates and transfected with reporter and beta-galactosidase plasmids using Lipofectamine Plus (Invitrogen). One day after transfection, cells were transferred to medium containing 0.2% FBS with or without TGF-beta (1–5 ng ml- 1) for 16 h. Cell extracts were prepared and assayed for luciferase activity as described42. Luciferase activities were normalized to beta-galactosidase activity from a co-transfected beta-galactosidase plasmid.

Immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting.

COS or 293T cells were harvested 48 h after transfection and lysed by brief sonication in lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% TritonX-100, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitor cocktail). Lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag M2 agarose (Sigma-Aldrich). Immune complexes were washed three times with lysis buffer and subjected to western blotting with anti-Flag or anti-Myc antibodies. To detect sumoylation of endogenous TbetaRI, Mv1Lu or MDA-231 cells were cultured for 3 h in DMEM with 0.2% FBS with or without TGF-beta (10 ng ml- 1). Cells were washed twice with PBS, harvested and lysed by sonication in lysis buffer containing 10 mM N-ethylmaleimide. The lysates were precleared with mouse IgG and incubated with rabbit anti-TbetaRI antibody (Santa Cruz Biotech) or IgG. Immune complexes were precipitated with protein G beads, and immunoblotted with mouse anti-SUMO-1 (Cell Signaling Technologies) or rabbit anti-TbetaRI antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotech).

In vitro sumoylation.

293T cells were transfected with plasmids expressing Flag-tagged proteins. Lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag M2 agarose, and immune complexes were eluted with Flag peptide (Sigma-Aldrich). The immunopurified proteins were incubated with 2 mug of recombinant SUMO-1 (BIOMOL International, Plymouth Meeting, PA), 0.5 mug of Aos1/Uba2 (BIOMOL International), and 0.1 mug of Ubc9 (BIOMOL International) for 2 h in 20 mul of 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM ATP. The reaction mixture was analysed by western blotting with anti-Flag antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). The TbetaRI kinase was inhibited by adding 5 muM SB431542 (Sigma-Aldrich). TbetaRI was dephosphorylated by treatment with lambda protein phosphatase (New England Biolabs) for 30 min.

GST adsorption assays.

Immunopurified Flag-tagged TbetaRI was subjected to in vitro sumoylation. The mixture of sumoylated and unsumoylated TbetaRI was incubated with immobilized GST–Smad3(D407E) in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 120 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P40, 10% glycerol and protease inhibitor cocktail. After pull-down, precipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by western blotting with anti-Flag antibody to detect TbetaRI.

Generation of stable cell lines.

Tgfbr1- /- cells were infected with the LNCX-based retroviral vector expressing Flag-tagged wild-type or K389R TbetaRI, and stably infected cell populations were generated as described43. The expression levels of TbetaRI were assessed by western blotting with anti-Flag antibody.

To generate Ras-transformed cells, Tgfbr1- /- cell populations with an empty vector or expressing Flag-tagged wild-type or K389R TbetaRI were transduced with the retroviral vector pBABE-H-Ras(Leu 61)-IRES-Puro or control vector pBABE-Puro, and selected with 2 mug ml- 1 puromycin. The expression levels of H-Ras(Leu 61) were examined by western blotting with anti-c-H-Ras antibody (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), and phosphorylated ERK1/2 was detected by western blotting with anti-phospho-ERK1/2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technologies).

In vitro kinase assays.

Immunopurified receptors were incubated at 30 °C for 30 min in 10 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM CaCl2 with or without 5 muM TbetaRI kinase inhibitor SB431542. The reaction mixture was subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography.

Cell-surface TGF-beta receptor biotinylation and precipitation.

Tgfbr1- /- cells expressing wild-type or K389R TbetaRI, or transfected with an empty vector, were grown to confluence and labelled with sulpho-N-hydroxysuccinimido biotin (Pierce) at 4 °C for 2 h. Cells were washed with 100 mM glyine and lysed by brief sonication in 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton cX-100, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitor cocktail. Biotinylated cell-surface proteins were precipitated with avidin-immobilized beads (Pierce) and subjected to western blotting with anti-Flag antibody to detect cell-surface TbetaRI.

TGF-betaresponse analyses.

To evaluate Smad3 phosphorylation, Tgfbr1- /- cells expressing wild-type or K389R TbetaRI were treated without or with 2.5 ng ml- 1 TGF-beta for 10, 30, 60 or 120 min, and cell lysates were analysed by western blotting with anti-phospho-Smad3 (Cell Signaling Technologies) or anti-Smad3 antibody (Invitrogen).

To perform the cell growth inhibition assay, 5 times 104Tgfbr1- /- cells expressing wild-type or K389R TbetaRI or having an empty vector were grown for 3 days in DMEM with 10% FBS without or with TGF-beta, and cell numbers were counted with a haemocytometer.

To quantify Smad7 mRNA expression, Tgfbr1- /- cells expressing Flag-tagged wild-type or K389R TbetaRI were treated with or without TGF-beta (2.5 ng ml- 1) for 4 h. RNA was isolated with RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and used as a template for reverse transcriptase. The Smad7 mRNA was quantified by real-time PCR with cyber-green (Invitrogen), and normalized against RPL19 mRNA. The primer sequences were as follows: Smad7, 5'-TCTGGACAGTCTGCAGTTGG-3' (forward) and 5'-TCCTGCTGTGCAAAGTGTTC-3' (reverse); RPL19, 5'-GGAAGAGGAAGGGTACTGCC-3' (forward) and 5'-GGATTCCCGGTATCTCCTGAG-3' (reverse).

In vitro invasion assay.

In vitro invasion assays were performed with Biocoat Matrigel Invasion chambers (BD Biosciences). Cells (2.5 times 104) were seeded into the upper insert of the chamber and incubated for 24 h, allowing invasion through Matrigel towards 10% serum. The invaded cells were fixed with 96% ethanol and stained with 0.05% crystal violet.

Tumour formation.

To perform lung tumour formation assays, 5 times 105 cells were injected into the tail vein of eight-week-old nude mice36. Three weeks after injection, the mice were labelled by intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg kg- 1 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU). At 1 h after injection of BrdU, the mice were killed, lung tumour nodules were counted, and lungs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for histological analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue sections.

Immunostaining for BrdU was performed with biotin-conjugated mouse anti-BrdU antibody (Alexis Biochemicals); detection was with the Vectastain Elite ABC kit detection system (Vector Laboratories).

Note: Supplementary Information is available on the Nature Cell Biology website.

Author contributions

J.S.K., R.J.A. and R.D. conceived and designed the studies; J.S.K. and E.F.S. performed the experiments; J.S.K., E.F.S., R.J.A. and R.D. prepared the manuscript.



Top

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants RO1-CA63101 and R21-CA125190 to R.D. and PO1 AR050440 and RO1s CA116019 and HL078564 to R.J.A. from the National Institutes of Health, and a Scientist Development grant 0630322N to J.S.K. from the American Heart Association.

Competing interests statement:

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Received 25 February 2008; Accepted 17 April 2008; Published online 11 May 2008.

Top

References

  1. Feng, X. H. & Derynck, R. Specificity and versatility in TGF-beta signaling through Smads. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 659–693 (2005). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  2. Massagué, J., Seoane, J. & Wotton, D. Smad transcription factors. Genes Dev. 19, 2783–2810 (2005). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Izzi, L. & Attisano, L. Ubiquitin-dependent regulation of TGFbeta signaling in cancer. Neoplasia 8, 677–688 (2006). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  4. Kavsak, P. et al. Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGFbeta receptor for degradation. Mol. Cell 6, 1365–1375 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Ebisawa, T. et al. Smurf1 interacts with transforming growth factor-beta type I receptor through Smad7 and induces receptor degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 12477–12480 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Kuratomi, G. et al. NEDD4-2 (neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-2) negatively regulates TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) signalling by inducing ubiquitin-mediated degradation of Smad2 and TGF-beta type I receptor. Biochem. J. 386, 461–470 (2005). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  7. Komuro, A. et al. Negative regulation of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling by WW domain-containing protein 1 (WWP1). Oncogene 23, 6914–6923 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  8. Wieser, R., Wrana, J. L. & Massagué, J. GS domain mutations that constitutively activate TbetaR-I, the downstream signaling component in the TGF-beta receptor complex. EMBO J. 14, 2199–2208 (1995). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Feng, X. H. & Derynck, R. Ligand-independent activation of transforming growth factor (TGF) beta signaling pathways by heteromeric cytoplasmic domains of TGF-beta receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13123–13129 (1996). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Johnson, E. S. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73, 355–382 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Goto, D. et al. A single missense mutant of Smad3 inhibits activation of both Smad2 and Smad3, and has a dominant negative effect on TGF-beta signals. FEBS Lett. 430, 201–204 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. Larsson, J. et al. Abnormal angiogenesis but intact hematopoietic potential in TGF-beta type I receptor-deficient mice. EMBO J. 20, 1663–1673 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  13. Levy, L. & Hill, C. S. Alterations in components of the TGF-beta superfamily signaling pathways in human cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 17, 41–58 (2006). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  14. Derynck, R., Akhurst, R. J. & Balmain, A. TGF-beta signaling in tumor suppression and cancer progression. Nature Genet. 29, 117–129 (2001). | Article |
  15. Oft, M., Heider, K. H. & Beug, H. TGFbeta signaling is necessary for carcinoma cell invasiveness and metastasis. Curr. Biol. 8, 1243–1252 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  16. Oft, M., Akhurst, R. J. & Balmain, A. Metastasis is driven by sequential elevation of H-ras and Smad2 levels. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 487–494 (2002). | Article |
  17. Chen, T., Carter, D., Garrigue-Antar, L. & Reiss, M. Transforming growth factor beta type I receptor kinase mutant associated with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 58, 4805–4810 (1998). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  18. Chen, T. et al. Novel inactivating mutations of transforming growth factor-beta type I receptor gene in head-and-neck cancer metastases. Int. J. Cancer 93, 653–661 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  19. Rajan, S., Plant, L. D., Rabin, M. L., Butler, M. H. & Goldstein, S. A. Sumoylation silences the plasma membrane leak K+ channel K2P1. Cell 121, 37–47 (2005). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  20. Benson, M. D. et al. SUMO modification regulates inactivation of the voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.5. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1805–1810 (2007). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  21. Martin, S., Nishimune, A., Mellor, J. R. & Henley, J. M. SUMOylation regulates kainate-receptor-mediated synaptic transmission. Nature 447, 321–325 (2007). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  22. Li, B., Carey, M. & Workman, J. L. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 128, 707–719 (2007). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  23. Bode, A. M. & Dong, Z. Post-translational modification of p53 in tumorigenesis. Nature Rev. Cancer 4, 793–805 (2004). | Article |
  24. Grönroos, E., Hellman, U., Heldin, C. H. & Ericsson, J. Control of Smad7 stability by competition between acetylation and ubiquitination. Mol. Cell 10, 483–493 (2002). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  25. Hietakangas, V. et al. PDSM, a motif for phosphorylation-dependent SUMO modification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 45–50 (2006). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  26. Rodriguez, M. S. et al. SUMO-1 modification activates the transcriptional response of p53. EMBO J. 18, 6455–6461 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  27. Buschmann, T., Fuchs, S. Y., Lee, C. G., Pan, Z. Q. & Ronai, Z. SUMO-1 modification of Mdm2 prevents its self-ubiquitylation and increases Mdm2 ability to ubiquitinate p53. Cell 101, 753–762 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  28. Schmidt, D. & Müller, S. Members of the PIAS family act as SUMO ligases for c-Jun and p53 and repress p53 activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2872–2877 (2002). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  29. Bies, J., Markus, J. & Wolff, L. Covalent attachment of the SUMO-1 protein to the negative regulatory domain of the c-Myb transcription factor modifies its stability and transactivation capacity. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 8999–9009 (2002). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  30. Kim, J. H. et al. Roles of sumoylation of a reptin chromatin-remodelling complex in cancer metastasis. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 631–639 (2006). | Article |
  31. Dore, J. J. Jr et al. Mechanisms of transforming growth factor-beta receptor endocytosis and intracellular sorting differ between fibroblasts and epithelial cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 675–684 (2001). | PubMed | ChemPort |
  32. Greenman, C. et al. Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature 446, 153–158 (2007). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  33. Lee, P. S., Chang, C., Liu, D. & Derynck, R. Sumoylation of Smad4, the common Smad mediator of transforming growth factor-beta family signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 27853–27863 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  34. Feng, X. H., Filvaroff, E. H. & Derynck, R. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta)-induced down-regulation of cyclin A expression requires a functional TGF-beta receptor complex. Characterization of chimeric and truncated type I and type II receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24237–24245 (1995). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  35. Miller, A. D. & Rosman, G. J. Improved retroviral vectors for gene transfer and expression. Biotechniques 7, 980–982, 984–986, 989–990 (1989). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  36. Johnson, R., Spiegelman, B., Hanahan, D. & Wisdom, R. Cellular transformation and malignancy induced by ras require c-jun. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4504–4511 (1996). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  37. ten Dijke, P. et al. Activin receptor-like kinases: a novel subclass of cell-surface receptors with predicted serine/threonine kinase activity. Oncogene 8, 2879–2887 (1993). | PubMed | ChemPort |
  38. ten Dijke, P. et al. Characterization of type I receptors for transforming growth factor-beta and activin. Science 264, 101–104 (1994). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  39. Feng, X. H., Zhang, Y., Wu, R. Y. & Derynck, R. The tumor suppressor Smad4/DPC4 and transcriptional adaptor CBP/p300 are coactivators for Smad3 in TGF-beta-induced transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 12, 2153–2163 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  40. Graycar, J. L. et al. Human transforming growth factor-beta3: recombinant expression, purification, and biological activities in comparison with transforming growth factors-beta1 and -beta2. Mol. Endocrinol. 3, 1977–1986 (1989). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  41. Dennler, S. et al. Direct binding of Smad3 and Smad4 to critical TGFbeta-inducible elements in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 gene. EMBO J. 17, 3091–3100 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  42. Kang, J. S., Alliston, T., Delston, R. & Derynck, R. Repression of Runx2 function by TGF-beta through recruitment of class II histone deacetylases by Smad3. EMBO J. 24, 2543–2555 (2005). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  43. Choy, L., Skillington, J. & Derynck, R. Roles of autocrine TGF-beta receptor and Smad signaling in adipocyte differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 149, 667–682 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  1. Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, Program in Cell Biology, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
  2. Cancer Research Institute, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
  3. Department of Anatomy, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
  4. Program In Human Genetics, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.

Correspondence to: Rik Derynck1,3 e-mail: rik.derynck@ucsf.edu

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

SUMO amplifies TGF-β signalling

Nature Cell Biology News and Views (01 Jun 2008)


Extra navigation

Subscribe to Nature Cell Biology

Subscribe

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs