Introduction
TGF-
signalling has key functions in cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, development and tumorigenesis. The mechanisms that lead to receptor activation and gene expression responses to TGF-
are generally understood1. Binding of TGF-
to a complex of two type I and two type II kinase receptors, namely T
RI and T
RII, confers T
RI activation and consequent direct carboxy-terminal phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 by T
RI. The activated Smads then associate with Smad4 and translocate into the nucleus to regulate transcription of target genes. TGF-
signalling is modulated by other signalling pathways and post-translational modifications. Indeed, the function of the Smad proteins is controlled by phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitylation and sumoylation2, 3.
Less is known about the regulation of TGF-
receptors by post-translational modification. Because the receptor complex is a central point for protein interactions, post-translational modifications could have key functions in the transduction of TGF-
signals. So far, phosphorylation and ubiquitylation have been shown to modify the receptors post-translationally3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Thus, recruitment of E3 ubiquitin ligases, including Smurfs, by the inhibitory Smad6 or Smad7 to the T
RII–T
RI complex can lead to T
RI ubiquitylation and consequent degradation. We now show that SUMO proteins, which primarily modify nuclear proteins and regulate their function, are conjugated to T
RI receptors in a regulated manner. T
RI sumoylation modulates the function of the TGF-
receptors and helps define the cellular responses to TGF-
.
Results
The type I TGF-
receptor T
RI is sumoylated
To examine the sumoylation of T
RI or T
RII, we expressed Flag-tagged rat T
RI or T
RII with Myc-tagged SUMO-1. Cell lysate immunoprecipitations with anti-Flag antibodies, followed by western blotting, detected Myc-tagged, sumoylated TGF-
receptors. As shown in Fig. 1a, SUMO was conjugated to T
RI, but not T
RII, resulting in a shift of more than 20 kDa, similar to that of other sumoylated proteins, indicating that T
RI is post-translationally sumoylated in vivo. T
RI sumoylation was increased when the E2-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 was co-expressed with SUMO-1, suggesting that Ubc9 is involved in the sumoylation of T
RI (Fig. 1b). Under conditions of Ubc9 overexpression and proportionally insufficient E3 SUMO ligase expression, up to three sumoylated T
RI forms were observed. Because only one SUMO-1 can be linked to a Lys residue, we assume that, under these conditions, the initial, site-specific sumoylation can confer additional T
RI sumoylation at other sites.
Figure 1: The type I TGF-
receptor T
RI is sumoylated.
(a) T
RI, but not T
RII, is sumoylated. Lysates of COS cells, expressing Flag-tagged (F-) T
RI or T
RII and Myc-tagged (M-) SUMO-1, were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-Flag antibody, followed by western blotting (WB) with anti-Myc to detect sumoylated TGF-
receptors. (b) Increasing expression of Ubc9 enhances T
RI sumoylation. COS cells, expressing Flag-tagged T
RI, Myc-tagged SUMO-1 and increasing levels of Ubc9, were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation, followed by western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (c) In vitro sumoylation of T
RI. Immunopurified Flag-tagged T
RI was incubated with or without recombinant SUMO-1, the E1 enzyme Aos1/Uba2 and the E2-conjugating enzyme Ubc9. The reaction mixture was analysed by western blotting with anti-Flag antibody. (d) TGF-
induces sumoylation of endogenous T
RI. Lysates of Mv1Lu or MDA-231 cells, treated with or without TGF-
, were immunoprecipitated with anti-T
RI and immunoblotted with antibody against SUMO-1. (e) T
RI, but not other type I receptors, is sumoylated. 293T cells, ectopically expressing the indicated type I receptor, Myc-tagged SUMO-1 and Ubc9, were lysed, and sumoylation was analysed by western blotting.
We next evaluated whether T
RI can be sumoylated in vitro. Immunopurified T
RI was incubated with SUMO-1, the E1 activating SUMO enzyme, Aos1/Uba2, and Ubc9 in the presence of ATP. Western blotting detected a band with a size that was compatible with the attachment of a SUMO-1 protein to T
RI and corresponded to the sumoylated T
RI in vivo. When the E1 or E2 enzyme, or SUMO-1, was absent, this band was not detected (Fig. 1c). This result suggests that T
RI was sumoylated in vitro.
Immunoprecipitation of T
RI from Mv1Lu or MDA-231 cells, treated with or without TGF-
, and immunoblotting with antibodies against SUMO-1, revealed that endogenous T
RI was sumoylated and that TGF-
induced T
RI sumoylation (Fig. 1d). These data indicate that receptor activation by TGF-
may induce sumoylation of T
RI.
We assessed whether other type I TGF-
family receptors could be sumoylated. Each type I receptor was expressed in the presence or absence of SUMO-1 and Ubc9, and sumoylation was analysed by immunoblotting. Whereas T
RI was sumoylated, other type I receptors were not (Fig. 1e).
T
RI kinase activity and phosphorylation are required for sumoylation of the T
RI receptor
To further characterize whether activation of T
RI affects its sumoylation, as apparent by the TGF-
-induced T
RI sumoylation (Fig. 1d), we compared the in vitro sumoylation efficacy of immunopurified wild-type T
RI and activated T
RI (caT
RI) with a Thr 202 to Asp mutation (Thr 202 in rat T
RI corresponds to Thr 204 in human T
RI), resulting in elevated kinase activity8. As shown in Fig. 2a, caT
RI was sumoylated much more efficiently than wild-type T
RI, suggesting that T
RI activation, which normally occurs by T
RII-mediated phosphorylation in response to TGF-
, facilitates sumoylation of the receptor.
Figure 2: The kinase activities of T
RI and T
RII are required for T
RI sumoylation.
(a) Activated T
RI is more sumoylated than wild-type T
RI. In vitro sumoylation of immunopurified Flag-tagged wild-type and activated (ca) T
RI in the presence or absence of recombinant SUMO-1, Aos1/Uba2 (E1), and Ubc9. The reaction mixture was analysed by western blotting for T
RI. (b) Effects of the T
RI kinase inhibitor and T
RI dephosphorylation on T
RI sumoylation. In vitro sumoylation was performed as in a with wild-type or activated (ca) T
RI, as indicated, in the presence or absence of the T
RI kinase inhibitor SB431542. The phosphates were removed from T
RI with lambda phosphatase before in vitro sumoylation. (c) The kinase activities of T
RII and T
RI are required for efficient T
RI sumoylation. 293T cells co-expressed a cytoplasmic receptor chimaera T
RII-RI, in which the T
RI cytoplasmic domain follows the T
RII cytoplasmic domain, or chimaeras in which the T
RII and/or T
RI kinase activities were inactivated by point mutation (KR), with Myc-tagged (M-) SUMO-1 and Ubc9. Sumoylation of the chimaera was analysed by western blotting. (d) In vitro sumoylation of immunopurified cytoplasmic receptor chimaeras or each of the kinase-defective receptor chimaeras, used in c. (e) Diagram showing TGF-
-induced sumoylation of T
RI in the receptor complex.
Because the activated T
RI has elevated kinase activity and increased phosphorylation8, we examined whether increased T
RI sumoylation resulted from increased T
RI kinase activity or phosphorylation. In vitro sumoylation of wild-type T
RI or caT
RI was decreased in the presence of SB431542, a specific T
RI kinase inhibitor, although this was more easily detected with caT
RI (Fig. 2b). These data suggested that the T
RI kinase regulates T
RI sumoylation. Because T
RI did not phosphorylate SUMO-1, the E1 enzyme (Aos/Uba2) and Ubc9 (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1a), these data suggested that T
RI autophosphorylation has a role in its sumoylation. To determine whether T
RI phosphorylation regulates T
RI sumoylation, we removed the Ser/Thr phosphorylation from T
RI by using lambda phosphatase before in vitro sumoylation. The absence or decrease of T
RI phosphorylation decreased the sumoylation of wild-type or activated T
RI (Fig. 2b). This again was more easily detected with activated T
RI than with wild-type T
RI, as a result of the difference in sumoylation level. These results suggest that increased kinase activity together with increased phosphorylation contribute remarkably to the efficiency of T
RI sumoylation.
TGF-
binding to T
RII results in stable complex formation of two T
RII and two T
RI receptors, in which T
RII phosphorylates the T
RI cytoplasmic domain and thereby activates the T
RI kinase1. The activated receptor complex permits autophosphorylation of the T
RII and T
RI dimers. To determine the roles of the T
RII and T
RI kinases in T
RI sumoylation, we used a cytoplasmic chimaera that fused the T
RI cytoplasmic domain to the T
RII cytoplasmic domain9. In this complex, the T
RII kinase activates the T
RI kinase without the need to add TGF-
. The receptor chimaera, expressed in the presence of SUMO and Ubc9, was sumoylated. Because T
RII is not sumoylated (Fig. 1a), the sumoylation site is within the T
RI cytoplasmic domain. Inactivation of the T
RI kinase by Lys 230 to Arg mutation decreased the chimaera sumoylation (Fig. 2c), which was consistent with the decreased T
RI sumoylation in the presence of SB431542 (Fig. 2b). Similar inactivation of the T
RII kinase by Lys 277 to Arg mutation also decreased sumoylation of the chimaera in comparison with the wild-type, kinase-active version (Fig. 2c). Because the T
RII cytoplasmic domain is not targeted for sumoylation, this result indicates that phosphorylation of the T
RI cytoplasmic domain by the T
RII kinase is important in the sumoylation of T
RI. Mutation of both kinase ATP-binding sites in the chimaera blocked sumoylation.
The requirement for both receptor kinase activities for sumoylation was also studied in vitro. The efficacies of in vitro sumoylation of wild-type, T
RI kinase-defective, T
RII kinase-defective and T
RI/II kinase-defective chimaeras, immunopurified from transfected cells, were compared (Fig. 2d). Inactivation of the kinase functions of T
RII or T
RI strongly decreased the sumoylation in vitro, whereas inactivation of both kinases abolished sumoylation of the chimaera (Fig. 2d).
These observations indicate that the kinase activities of both T
RI and T
RII, and the consequent phosphorylation of T
RI, are required for efficient TGF-
-induced sumoylation of T
RI in the receptor complex. This is consistent with the TGF-
-induced phosphorylation and consequent activation of T
RI by T
RII (Fig. 2e).
The T
RI receptor is sumoylated on Lys 389
Sumoylation often occurs on a lysine residue (K) within a consensus sequence
Kx(D/E), in which
represents a large hydrophobic residue10. Because this consensus sequence is absent from the amino-acid sequence of T
RI, each of the 20 lysine residues in the cytoplasmic domain was singly replaced by arginine, and the effect of each mutation on T
RI sumoylation was tested. Lysates of cells co-expressing each Flag-tagged lysine mutant of T
RI with SUMO-1 and Ubc9 were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag antibody, followed by western blotting. T
RI was not sumoylated when Lys 389 was replaced by arginine, whereas replacements of other lysine residues by arginine did not affect the sumoylation of T
RI (Fig. 3a, and data not shown), indicating that Lys 389 is a major site for T
RI sumoylation. The Lys 389 mutation also affected in vitro sumoylation, because no sumoylated T
RI was detected when Lys 389 was replaced by arginine (Fig. 3b). These results indicate that Lys 389 is the only residue targeted for sumoylation.
Figure 3: The T
RI receptor is sumoylated on Lys 389.
(a) Mutation of Lys 389 abolishes T
RI sumoylation. 293T cells expressed Flag-tagged wild-type (WT) or mutant T
RI with the indicated lysine-to-arginine mutation, with Myc-tagged SUMO-1 and Ubc9. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag antibody, followed by western blotting for SUMO-1. (b) In vitro sumoylation of wild-type T
RI or K389R T
RI. Immunopurified T
RI was subjected to in vitro sumoylation followed by immunoblotting to detect sumoylation. (c) Proposed structure of the T
RI cytoplasmic domain. The Lys 389, L45 loop, GS region and ATP-binding site are indicated. N and C indicate the N and C termini. (d) Sequence alignment of the T
RI sequence containing Lys 389 and corresponding regions of other type I receptors.
The proposed structure of the T
RI cytoplasmic domain (Fig. 3c) predicts that Lys 389 is located in the hinge between the
EF helix and the
F helix, and is exposed at the surface of the C lobe of the kinase domain. The sumoylation site faces the same orientation as the GS region, which is phosphorylated by T
RII on the binding of TGF-
, and the L45 loop, which specifies the interaction with Smad, although in a separate protein domain. The GS region and L45 loop, both located in the N lobe, interact with the Smad for phosphorylation by T
RI. The exposure of Lys 389 at the protein surface predicts that conjugation with SUMO strongly affects the cytosolic surface of T
RI and may regulate the binding of Smad to the L45 loop and GS domain of T
RI, and interactions of additional proteins with the receptor complex.
Sequence comparisons (Fig. 3d) show that Lys 389 is not conserved in other TGF-
-family type I receptors, with the exception of the activin receptor ActRIB/ALK-4. This is consistent with the absence of sumoylation of these type I receptors in vivo (Fig. 1e). The lack of ActRIB/ALK-4 sumoylation suggests that other determinants besides the target lysine are needed for sumoylation of T
RI. It is unlikely that this is due to the serine versus threonine difference, four residues preceding the sumoylated lysine residue in T
RI compared with ActRIB/ALK-4 (Fig. 3d), because S385T replacement did not affect the in vitro sumoylation of T
RI (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1b).
T
RI sumoylation regulates Smad interaction and activation
To evaluate whether sumoylation of the exposed Lys 389 affects Smad activation, we examined the interaction of Smad3 with caT
RI. Because this interaction is hard to detect by immunoprecipitation, probably as a result of its low affinity and transient nature, we examined the interaction of the Smad3D407E mutant with caT
RI. The D407E mutation in the MH2 domain was identified in Smad2 in colorectal carcinoma, and affects the interaction of Smad with T
RI and heteromerization with Smad4 (ref. 11). Increased caT
RI sumoylation by co-expressing Ubc9 and SUMO-1 enhanced the interaction of T
RI with Smad3D407E. In contrast, coexpression of SUMO and Ubc9 did not enhance the interaction of Smad3D407E with caT
RI carrying the sumoylation-resistant K389R mutation (Fig. 4a). We also incubated immobilized glutathione S-transferase (GST)–Smad3D407E with a mixture of sumoylated and unsumoylated T
RI. Western blotting of purified GST–Smad3–T
RI complexes showed preferential binding of Smad3 to sumoylated T
RI, in comparison with unsumoylated T
RI, even though the latter was in large excess (Fig. 4b). This result, together with the data in Fig. 4a, indicates that sumoylation of T
RI enhances Smad3 recruitment and suggests that T
RI sumoylation enhances Smad activation.
Figure 4: T
RI sumoylation regulates Smad activation and TGF-
responses.
(a) Interaction of Smad3 with T
RI. Activated (ca) T
RI or its K389R mutant were coexpressed with Myc-tagged (M-) SUMO-1 and Ubc9, and/or Smad3D407E in 293T cells. The lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation, and analysed by western blotting. (b) In vitro interaction of Smad3 with T
RI. Immobilized GST or GST–Smad3(D407E) were incubated with in vitro sumoylated and non-sumoylated Flag-tagged T
RI. Adsorbed proteins were subjected to western blotting for T
RI. The lower panel shows Coomassie blue staining of GST and GST–Smad3(D407E) used for the adsorption. (c) The indicated fibroblasts were subjected to western blotting to assess the expression of T
RI. (d) Biotin-labelled cell-surface proteins from the indicated MEFs were subjected to avidin precipitation, followed by western blotting to assess the cell-surface expression levels of T
RI. (e) Wild-type and K389R T
RI have similar kinase activities. T
RI, immunopurified from transfected 293T cells, was subjected to kinase reactions without or with T
RI kinase inhibitor. (f, g) Lack of T
RI sumoylation confers a lower level of Smad3 (f) or Smad2 (g) activation. Tgfbr1-
/-
fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type or K389R T
RI were treated without or with TGF-
for the indicated time. Cell lysates were analysed by western blotting. (h) Lack of T
RI sumoylation decreases Smad3-mediated transcription. Tgfbr1-
/-
fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type T
RI or K389R mutant T
RI were transfected with the Smad3-responsive (CAGA)12-luciferase reporter. Luciferase activities were measured. The error bars represent s.d. (n = 2) (i) Lack of T
RI sumoylation decreases TGF-
-induced endogenous gene expression. Tgfbr1-
/-
fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type T
RI or K389R mutant T
RI were treated without or with TGF-
. Smad7 mRNA was quantified with real-time PCR. The error bars represent s.d. (n = 3) (j) Lack of T
RI sumoylation decreases TGF-
-induced growth inhibition. Tgfbr1-
/-
fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type or K389R T
RI, or with an empty vector, were cultured without or with the indicated dose of TGF-
for 3 days. The cells were then counted. The error bars represent s.d. (n = 3). Uncropped images of blots in a and f are shown in Supplementary Information, Fig. S4.
Because T
RI phosphorylates Smad2 and Smad3 after the binding of TGF-
, we investigated whether sumoylation of activated T
RI affects Smad3 phosphorylation. T
RI-defective mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from Tgfbr1-
/-
mice12 were retrovirally infected to express wild-type T
RI or sumoylation-resistant K389R T
RI. Stably selected cell populations, expressing either T
RI form at equal levels (Fig. 4c), showed equivalent cell-surface levels of wild-type or mutant T
RI (Fig. 4d), suggesting that the K389R mutation did not affect cell-surface transport or stability of T
RI. K389R T
RI also showed a similar phosphorylation level to that of wild-type T
RI, resulting primarily from the T
RI kinase activity, because SB431542 abolished this phosphorylation (Fig. 4e). Fractionation of cell lysates did not reveal differences in subcellular compartmentalization of wild-type versus mutant T
RI (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1c). We then compared wild-type and K389R T
RI for their ability to phosphorylate Smad3 in response to TGF-
. In fibroblasts expressing wild-type T
RI, TGF-
induced Smad3 phosphorylation within 15 min, whereas, in cells expressing K389R T
RI, the Smad3 phosphorylation kinetics in response to TGF-
was slower, with first detection at 30 min. Furthermore, the overall level of Smad3 activation was lower in cells expressing K389R T
RI than in cells expressing wild-type T
RI (Fig. 4f). Similar results were seen with TGF-
-induced activation of Smad2 (Fig. 4g). Replacement of Lys 393 in ActRIB/ALK-4, which is not sumoylated and corresponds to Lys 389 in T
RI, with arginine did not affect Smad3 activation (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1d).
The differences in level and kinetics of Smad2 and Smad3 phosphorylation by wild-type versus K389R T
RI, together with the results of the interaction of Smad3 with T
RI, suggest that T
RI sumoylation enhances the Smad interaction with T
RI, allowing more efficient phosphorylation and activation of Smad2/3 in response to TGF-
.
T
RI sumoylation regulates functional responses to TGF-
Using Tgfbr1-
/-
fibroblasts ectopically expressing wild-type or K389R T
RI, we characterized the effect of T
RI sumoylation on Smad-mediated transcription; that is, the functional consequence of Smad activation. We used a reporter in which tandem Smad-binding sites control luciferase transcription. Cells expressing K389R T
RI showed decreased transcription from the Smad3-responsive promoter compared with cells expressing wild-type T
RI (Fig. 4h). We also compared the endogenous expression of the TGF-
-responsive Smad7 gene by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR). Cells expressing K389R T
RI showed decreased expression of Smad7 messenger RNA in response to TGF-
, compared with cells expressing wild-type T
RI (Fig. 4i). Similar results were obtained with two additional populations of Tgfbr1-
/-
fibroblasts ectopically expressing T
RI or K389R T
RI at similar levels (Supplementary Information, Fig. S2). These results suggest that T
RI sumoylation defines the TGF-
-induced transcriptional regulation.
We also examined the contribution of T
RI sumoylation to the antiproliferative response to TGF-
. We seeded the fibroblasts expressing wild-type or K389R T
RI in parallel with the parental Tgfbr1-
/-
cells as control cells, and determined the proliferative response after adding TGF-
. Cells lacking T
RI were not affected in their proliferation by TGF-
, whereas those expressing wild-type T
RI responded with decreased proliferation, as assessed by cell number (Fig. 4j). In contrast with wild-type T
RI, cells expressing K389R T
RI showed a decreased growth inhibitory response to TGF-
. This result suggests that sumoylation regulates the T
RI-mediated antiproliferative response to TGF-
and renders the cells more responsive to TGF-
.
T
RI sumoylation enhances invasion and metastasis of Ras-transformed cells
Because autocrine TGF-
signalling regulates cancer progression13, 14 we postulated that resistance to sumoylation, while suppressing TGF-
growth inhibitory activities, affects tumour progression. To address this issue, the Tgfbr1-
/-
fibroblasts, carrying a control empty vector or ectopically expressing wild-type or K389R T
RI at similar levels, were transduced with a control vector or a vector expressing activated Ha-Ras (Leu 61) to generate tumorigenic cell populations. Mutant Ras was expressed and activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) MAP kinase to similar extents in all three Ras-transformed cell populations (Fig. 5a). Cells expressing activated Ras had a transformed phenotype, which was apparent from the altered cell morphology and loss of contact inhibition (data not shown).
Figure 5: Lack of T
RI sumoylation decreases TGF-
-regulated invasion and metastasis.
(a) Ras-transformed Tgfbr1-
/-
fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type or K389R T
RI, or with an empty vector, were subjected to western blotting for T
RI, Ras or phospho-ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) as a marker of Ras activation. (b, c) T
RI-mediated TGF-
responsiveness of Ras-transformed cells promotes invasion, which is decreased by lack of T
RI sumoylation. Cells were seeded on a Matrigel-coated Transwell filter and incubated for 24 h to allow invasion towards 10% serum. Cells that migrated through the filter were stained with crystal violet. The white stipples indicate the pores in the filter. A representative picture and quantification of invaded cells are shown in b and c, respectively. Error bars represent s.d. (n = 4) (d, e) Ras-transformed Tgfbr1-
/-
fibroblasts expressing wild-type or K389R T
RI, or with an empty vector, were injected into the tail vein of nude mice. The lung tumour nodules were counted after 3 weeks. (d) Representative pictures of lungs from mice with Ras-transformed MEFs are shown in the upper panels, and corresponding haematoxylin/eosin-stained sections of tumour nodules at the same magnification (
10 objective) are shown in the lower panels. (e) Quantification of tumour nodules in the lungs. Error bars represent s.e.m. (n = 6). The single and double asterisks indicate P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively, compared with wild-type T
RI.
We examined the invasion of the Ras-transformed cells by using a modified Boyden chamber assay in which cells migrate through Matrigel towards serum. Ras-transformed Tgfbr1-
/-
cells ectopically expressing wild-type T
RI showed a higher invasion activity than Ras-transformed Tgfbr1-
/-
cells lacking T
RI (Fig. 5b), indicating that the invasive capacity of Ras-transformed MEFs depends on T
RI signalling. Ras-transformed Tgfbr1-
/-
MEFs expressing K389R T
RI were less invasive than cells expressing wild-type T
RI, indicating that, in this system, lack of T
RI sumoylation impairs the T
RI-dependent invasion of transformed cells (Fig. 5b, c). These observations are consistent with the role of sumoylation of T
RI in TGF-
-induced gene expression and growth inhibition (Fig. 4h–j).
Metastasis is a complex process, requiring cell growth, migration, invasion, intravasation and extravasation, and cell survival in the circulatory system and at the metastatic site. Using a mouse tail-vein injection model, autocrine TGF-
signalling was shown to enhance the ability of tumour cells to establish metastatic nodules within the lung15, 16. To determine the roles of T
RI and sumoylation of T
RI in the formation of metastatic nodules in this model, we compared the ability of the Tgfbr1-
/-
MEF derivatives to colonize the lung. Colonization of the lungs by MEFs was fully dependent on expression of activated Ha-Ras (Fig. 5d, e; data not shown). Ras-transformed Tgfbr1-
/-
cells gave rise to only few very small lung tumour nodules (Fig. 5d, e). Tumour cells were proliferative with a high incidence of apoptosis (Supplementary Information, Fig. S3h). The tumours were morphologically heterogeneous, and large cells with massive nuclei were indicative of chromosomal instability (Supplementary Information, Fig. S3e). Remarkably, Ras-transformed Tgfbr1-
/-
cells ectopically expressing wild-type or K389R T
RI developed numerous large metastatic nodules (Fig. 5d, e). MEFs expressing sumoylation-defective T
RI gave rise to fewer tumour nodules than cells expressing the wild-type receptor (Fig. 5e). These nodules were generally smaller than those from wild-type MEFs expressing T
RI (Fig. 5d, and data not shown), although their histological appearance (Fig. 5d) and proliferative rates (Supplementary Information, Fig. S3a) were similar. These results suggest that, in this model of TGF-
-mediated metastasis, T
RI sumoylation contributes to tumour progression by enhancing tumour cell extravasation, survival and/or growth at the metastatic site.
The Ser385Tyr mutation of T
RI, implicated in metastatic cancer, confers sumoylation resistance
Mutations in TGF-
signalling mediators, including TGFBR1, have been associated with human cancers13. Among these, a missense mutation, S387Y, in TGFBR1 was enriched in breast and head-and-neck cancer metastases, in comparison with corresponding primary tumours17, 18. This mutation confers diminished TGF-
signalling and is the only mutation in TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 known to associate specifically with tumour metastases17. Because the corresponding residue in rat T
RI, namely Ser 385, localizes close to the Lys 389 sumoylation site of T
RI (Fig. 6a), we examined whether rat S385Y T
RI was sumoylated. In contrast with wild-type T
RI, this mutant was not sumoylated in cells overexpressing SUMO-1 and Ubc9 (Fig. 6b). In vitro, replacement of Ser 385 with Tyr (Fig. 6c) or Ala (Fig. 6d) also strongly decreased sumoylation. In contrast, replacement of Ser 385 with Thr, which may, similarly to Ser, be targeted for phosphorylation by Ser/Thr kinases, did not affect sumoylation (Supplementary Information, Fig. S1b). These results indicate that this single amino-acid substitution prevents T
RI sumoylation.
Figure 6: The Ser385Tyr mutation impairs T
RI sumoylation and function.
(a, b) Ser385Tyr T
RI is not sumoylated. (a) The rat T
RI sequence is shown with Lys 389 as sumoylation site four amino-acid residues away from Ser 385, which is equivalent to Ser 387 in human T
RI. (b) 293T cells co-expressing wild-type, K389R or S385Y T
RI, with Myc-tagged (M-) SUMO-1 and Ubc9, were lysed and analysed by western blotting to detect sumoylation. (c, d) In vitro sumoylation of S385Y mutant T
RI (c) or S385A T
RI (d) in comparison with wild-type T
RI. Immunopurified T
RI was subjected to in vitro sumoylation followed by immunoblotting to detect sumoylation. (e) Tgfbr1-
/-
fibroblasts stably expressing wild-type, K389R or S385Y T
RI were transfected with the Smad3-responsive (CAGA)12-luciferase reporter. Luciferase activities without or in response to added TGF-
were measured. Error bars represent s.d. (n = 3). (f) Representative pictures of lungs from mice with Ras-transformed MEFs are shown in upper panels, and corresponding haematoxylin/eosin-stained sections of tumour nodules at the same magnification (
10 objective) are shown in the lower panels. (g) Quantification of tumour nodules in the lungs. Error bars represent s.e.m. (n = 6). Double asterisk indicates P < 0.01 compared with wild-type T
RI.
We examined whether the S385Y mutation decreased the responsiveness to TGF-
, as observed with the sumoylation-defective K389R T
RI (Fig. 4). Using the Smad3-responsive reporter of Fig. 4h, cells expressing S385Y T
RI responded to TGF-
with a lower level of transcription than cells expressing wild-type T
RI, but a higher level than cells expressing K389R T
RI (Fig. 6e), indicating that the decreased TGF-
responsiveness associated with S385Y T
RI correlates with impaired T
RI sumoylation. We also evaluated the S385Y T
RI mutation in the lung colonization tumour model. Ras-transformed MEFs expressing S385Y T
RI formed fewer and smaller metastatic nodules than cells expressing wild-type T
RI (Fig. 6f, g). Although this difference in tumour nodule formation is qualitatively comparable to that of K389R T
RI cells, the efficiency of metastatic nodule formation was more impaired in S385Y T
RI cells than in K389R T
RI cells. This quantitative difference between cells expressing K389R T
RI or S385Y T
RI, when compared with their differential activities in transcription assays, raises the possibility that the impaired T
RI sumoylation resulting from the S385Y mutation may be complemented with an additional defect of relevance to cancer progression.
Discussion
Here we provide evidence that a cell-surface polypeptide growth factor receptor is modified by sumoylation in a regulated, ligand-dependent manner. Conjugation of SUMO to T
RI depends on T
RI activation by phosphorylation, which in turn is induced by the binding of TGF-
to the T
RII–T
RI complex. TGF-
receptor sumoylation enhances the recruitment and activation of Smad3, and consequently regulates TGF-
responses.
Little is known about the sumoylation of transmembrane proteins and how this affects their function. The ion channel proteins K2P1 and Kv1.5 are sumoylated, and this modification regulates their inactivation19, 20. Sumoylation of the kainate receptor subunit GluR6 is increased in response to kainate and enhances endocytosis, resulting in a negative effect on synaptic transmission21. This raises the possibility that T
RI sumoylation affects the internalization, recycling and/or stability of receptors.
Interplay between different modifications provides a mechanism for regulating protein function. For example, phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation and ubiquitylation of histone H3 and H4 amino-terminal sequences affect each other to control gene expression22. Stress-induced N-terminal phosphorylation of p53 regulates its C-terminal acetylation23. In addition, Smad7 acetylation inhibits its ubiquitylation24. Here we show interplay between phosphorylation and sumoylation in regulating T
RI function. Thus, TGF-
-induced phosphorylation of T
RI by itself and T
RII is required for the sumoylation of T
RI to regulate its function. Phosphorylation-dependent sumoylation has been observed in transcription regulators, such as heat-shock factors, GATA-1 and MEF-2, and was shown to involve a
KxExxSP motif25. Within this motif, serine phosphorylation was suggested to contribute to sumoylation of lysine. Although T
RI lacks this motif, the dependence of T
RI sumoylation on phosphorylation is consistent with the requirements of the kinase activities of the receptor complex, and consequent T
RI phosphorylation, for T
RI sumoylation. How T
RI phosphorylation augments sumoylation remains to be determined.
T
RI sumoylation provides a new mechanism for the functional regulation of TGF-
responses. By regulating Smad activation and downstream transcription responses, T
RI sumoylation may elaborate the TGF-
responses that drive cancer progression. Indeed, sumoylation is thought to be important in tumorigenesis because some oncogene proteins and tumour suppressors26, 27, 28, 29 are sumoylated. In addition, sumoylation of the reptin chromatin complex regulates the KAI1 metastasis suppressor gene and the invasive activity of cancer cells30. We here provide independent data to link sumoylation with tumour progression. Increased TGF-
1 expression by tumour cells and their microenvironment, and increased TGF-
signalling within tumour cells, are thought to be important factors in cancer progression16, 18. In a model of TGF-
-dependent metastasis of cancer cells to the lung, T
RI sumoylation enhanced tumorigenesis.
The proposed association of a sumoylation-resistant T
RI mutant with breast cancer metastasis14 seems at odds with our in vivo results with Ras-transformed Tgfbr1-
/-
fibroblasts. Differences in cellular origin of the tumours (highly malignant epithelial cells versus diploid embryonic fibroblasts31) and the use of an immune-incompetent mouse model that addresses only a few components of the metastatic process may explain this discrepancy. In comparison with MEFs, human metastatic tumours bear multiple mutations32; these tumours have elevated levels of sumoylating enzymes and diminished levels of desumoylating enzymes30. Thus, there may be a metastatic advantage to mutating the T
RI sumoylation site to prevent overactivation of the receptor. Retention of functional TGF-
receptors is advantageous to the spread of metastatic tumours15; thus, human tumours with homozygous deletion of TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 are rare13, 14 and present a better prognosis for patient survival13, 14. Mutation of the sumoylation site might more subtly alter T
RI activity, modulating a mechanism that contributes to metastasis while retaining enough T
RI activity for the intravasation and extravasation of tumour cells. Overall, though, along with a previous report30, our data suggest a connection between sumoylation and cancer progression.
Methods
Plasmids.
The expression plasmids for N-terminally Flag-tagged or Myc-tagged SUMO-1, or Ubc9 or C-terminally Flag-tagged T
RI have been described33, 34. The expression plasmid for the Flag-tagged T
RII–T
RI cytoplasmic chimaera has also been described9. Site-directed mutagenesis with the QuikChange kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) generated plasmids encoding C-terminally Flag-tagged T
RI or T
RII–T
RI cytoplasmic chimaeras with amino-acid substitutions, and mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing. To generate retroviral vectors expressing Flag-tagged T
RI, the coding region was inserted into the HpaI site of LNCX35. The retroviral vector pBABE-H-Ras(Leu 61)-IRES-Puro36 was provided by R. Davis (University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA). The expression plamid for Myc-tagged Smad3(D407E)11 was provided by K. Miyazono (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan). Expression plasmids for haemagglutinin (HA)-tagged ALK-1, ALK-3 or ALK-6 were generated by subcloning the coding regions from pcDNA3-HA-ALK1, pcDNA3-HA-ALK3 and pcDNA3-HA-ALK6 (refs 37, 38), provided by P. ten Dijke (University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands), into the EcoRI/XhoI site of pRK5. A plasmid encoding Flag-tagged ALK-2 was made by inserting the coding region from pRK5-Myc-ALK2 into the EcoRI/SalI site of pXFIF39. To generate a plasmid encoding Flag-tagged ALK-4, the coding region from pcDNA1-hALK4 (ref. 37), provided by C. H. Heldin (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Uppsala, Sweden) was amplified by PCR and inserted into the EcoRI/SalI site of pRK5 (ref. 40). The reporter plasmid (CAGA)12-luciferase41 was also provided by P. ten Dijke.
Cell culture and transfections.
Tgfbr1-
/-
MEFs12 were provided by S. Karlsson (Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden), immortalized and cultured in DMEM medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cells were plated at 2
105 cells per well in six-well plates and transfected with reporter and
-galactosidase plasmids using Lipofectamine Plus (Invitrogen). One day after transfection, cells were transferred to medium containing 0.2% FBS with or without TGF-
(1–5 ng ml-
1) for 16 h. Cell extracts were prepared and assayed for luciferase activity as described42. Luciferase activities were normalized to
-galactosidase activity from a co-transfected
-galactosidase plasmid.
Immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting.
COS or 293T cells were harvested 48 h after transfection and lysed by brief sonication in lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% TritonX-100, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitor cocktail). Lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag M2 agarose (Sigma-Aldrich). Immune complexes were washed three times with lysis buffer and subjected to western blotting with anti-Flag or anti-Myc antibodies. To detect sumoylation of endogenous T
RI, Mv1Lu or MDA-231 cells were cultured for 3 h in DMEM with 0.2% FBS with or without TGF-
(10 ng ml-
1). Cells were washed twice with PBS, harvested and lysed by sonication in lysis buffer containing 10 mM N-ethylmaleimide. The lysates were precleared with mouse IgG and incubated with rabbit anti-T
RI antibody (Santa Cruz Biotech) or IgG. Immune complexes were precipitated with protein G beads, and immunoblotted with mouse anti-SUMO-1 (Cell Signaling Technologies) or rabbit anti-T
RI antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotech).
In vitro sumoylation.
293T cells were transfected with plasmids expressing Flag-tagged proteins. Lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Flag M2 agarose, and immune complexes were eluted with Flag peptide (Sigma-Aldrich). The immunopurified proteins were incubated with 2
g of recombinant SUMO-1 (BIOMOL International, Plymouth Meeting, PA), 0.5
g of Aos1/Uba2 (BIOMOL International), and 0.1
g of Ubc9 (BIOMOL International) for 2 h in 20
l of 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM ATP. The reaction mixture was analysed by western blotting with anti-Flag antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). The T
RI kinase was inhibited by adding 5
M SB431542 (Sigma-Aldrich). T
RI was dephosphorylated by treatment with lambda protein phosphatase (New England Biolabs) for 30 min.
GST adsorption assays.
Immunopurified Flag-tagged T
RI was subjected to in vitro sumoylation. The mixture of sumoylated and unsumoylated T
RI was incubated with immobilized GST–Smad3(D407E) in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 120 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P40, 10% glycerol and protease inhibitor cocktail. After pull-down, precipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by western blotting with anti-Flag antibody to detect T
RI.
Generation of stable cell lines.
Tgfbr1-
/-
cells were infected with the LNCX-based retroviral vector expressing Flag-tagged wild-type or K389R T
RI, and stably infected cell populations were generated as described43. The expression levels of T
RI were assessed by western blotting with anti-Flag antibody.
To generate Ras-transformed cells, Tgfbr1-
/-
cell populations with an empty vector or expressing Flag-tagged wild-type or K389R T
RI were transduced with the retroviral vector pBABE-H-Ras(Leu 61)-IRES-Puro or control vector pBABE-Puro, and selected with 2
g ml-
1 puromycin. The expression levels of H-Ras(Leu 61) were examined by western blotting with anti-c-H-Ras antibody (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), and phosphorylated ERK1/2 was detected by western blotting with anti-phospho-ERK1/2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technologies).
In vitro kinase assays.
Immunopurified receptors were incubated at 30 °C for 30 min in 10 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM CaCl2 with or without 5
M T
RI kinase inhibitor SB431542. The reaction mixture was subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography.
Cell-surface TGF-
receptor biotinylation and precipitation.
Tgfbr1-
/-
cells expressing wild-type or K389R T
RI, or transfected with an empty vector, were grown to confluence and labelled with sulpho-N-hydroxysuccinimido biotin (Pierce) at 4 °C for 2 h. Cells were washed with 100 mM glyine and lysed by brief sonication in 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton cX-100, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitor cocktail. Biotinylated cell-surface proteins were precipitated with avidin-immobilized beads (Pierce) and subjected to western blotting with anti-Flag antibody to detect cell-surface T
RI.
TGF-
response analyses.
To evaluate Smad3 phosphorylation, Tgfbr1-
/-
cells expressing wild-type or K389R T
RI were treated without or with 2.5 ng ml-
1 TGF-
for 10, 30, 60 or 120 min, and cell lysates were analysed by western blotting with anti-phospho-Smad3 (Cell Signaling Technologies) or anti-Smad3 antibody (Invitrogen).
To perform the cell growth inhibition assay, 5
104Tgfbr1-
/-
cells expressing wild-type or K389R T
RI or having an empty vector were grown for 3 days in DMEM with 10% FBS without or with TGF-
, and cell numbers were counted with a haemocytometer.
To quantify Smad7 mRNA expression, Tgfbr1-
/-
cells expressing Flag-tagged wild-type or K389R T
RI were treated with or without TGF-
(2.5 ng ml-
1) for 4 h. RNA was isolated with RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and used as a template for reverse transcriptase. The Smad7 mRNA was quantified by real-time PCR with cyber-green (Invitrogen), and normalized against RPL19 mRNA. The primer sequences were as follows: Smad7, 5'-TCTGGACAGTCTGCAGTTGG-3' (forward) and 5'-TCCTGCTGTGCAAAGTGTTC-3' (reverse); RPL19, 5'-GGAAGAGGAAGGGTACTGCC-3' (forward) and 5'-GGATTCCCGGTATCTCCTGAG-3' (reverse).
In vitro invasion assay.
In vitro invasion assays were performed with Biocoat Matrigel Invasion chambers (BD Biosciences). Cells (2.5
104) were seeded into the upper insert of the chamber and incubated for 24 h, allowing invasion through Matrigel towards 10% serum. The invaded cells were fixed with 96% ethanol and stained with 0.05% crystal violet.
Tumour formation.
To perform lung tumour formation assays, 5
105 cells were injected into the tail vein of eight-week-old nude mice36. Three weeks after injection, the mice were labelled by intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg kg-
1 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU). At 1 h after injection of BrdU, the mice were killed, lung tumour nodules were counted, and lungs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for histological analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue sections.
Immunostaining for BrdU was performed with biotin-conjugated mouse anti-BrdU antibody (Alexis Biochemicals); detection was with the Vectastain Elite ABC kit detection system (Vector Laboratories).
Note: Supplementary Information is available on the Nature Cell Biology website.
Author contributions
J.S.K., R.J.A. and R.D. conceived and designed the studies; J.S.K. and E.F.S. performed the experiments; J.S.K., E.F.S., R.J.A. and R.D. prepared the manuscript.

