Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements and Focuses
Image gallery
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
The Cell Migration Gateway
Nature Reports Stem Cells
Nature Reports Avian Flu
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Brief Communication
Nature Cell Biology  1, 72 - 74 (1999)
doi:10.1038/9048

Endocytic vesicles move at the tips of actin tails in cultured mast cells

Christien J. Merrifield1, 4, Stephen E. Moss1, Christoph Ballestrem2, Beat A. Imhof2, Günter Giese3, Ilse Wunderlich3 & Wolfhard Almers3, 4

1 Department of Physiology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK

2 Department of Pathology, Centre Medical Universitaire, Rue Michel-Servet 1, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland

3 Max Planck Institute für Medizinische Forschung, Jahnstrasse 29, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

4 Present address: Vollum Institute, 3181 Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, Oregon 97201-3098, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Wolfhard Almers almersw@ohsu.edu
Actin polymerization is thought to provide the motive force for crawling cells by driving the spread of lamellipodia 1. It may also be involved when membrane ruffles engulf external fluid during macropinocytosis 2. Here we show that, in cells transfected with a fusion protein consisting of green fluorescent protein (GFP) and beta-actin, pinosomes (vesicles used for fluid uptake) ignite a burst of actin polymerization when they are pinched off from the plasma membrane. Pinosomes then move into the cytosol at the tips of short-lived actin 'comet tails' that are similar to those that propel Listeria 3 and other microorganisms 4, 5 through infected cells. Like Listeria, pinosomes appear to carry the machinery required for propulsive actin polymerization. The direction of pinosome movement indicates that they may acquire this machinery from the crests of membrane ruffles. We suggest that actin polymerization moves the leading edge of ruffles. Endocytic vesicles may also use actin polymerization to move into the cytosol after being pinched off from the plasma membrane.

We transfected rat basophilic leukaemia (RBL) cells with GFP-labelled beta-actin 6 and allowed them to ruffle and undergo macropinocytosis in a mildly hyperosmolar medium 7. Ruffles faintly aglow with GFP−actin engulfed fluid and formed vesicular structures near the plasma membrane (not shown). The structures fluoresced (Fig. 1a, arrowhead) as they ignited a burst of actin polymerization that caused a streak of actin to move through the cell, much like actin 'comet tails'. The tips of the actin tails were cup-shaped as if to accommodate vesicles, and appeared to push spherical objects that were visible as dark shadows. Large tails sometimes appeared hollow (not shown).

Figure 1. Tails of F-actin move through live RBL cells.
Figure 1 thumbnail

a, Formation of GFP-labelled actin tails during pinocytosis. Arrowhead points to polymerized actin partly surrounding a dark structure that probably represents a pinocytic vesicle; arrows show the growth of an actin tail whose cup-shaped end probably propels the pinocytic vesicle. Results were recorded by EFM 8. Times are relative to the beginning of the sequence. Video sequences showing actin comet tails in cells expressing GFP−actin are available as Supplementary Information . b, The speed of motile actin tails is plotted. The abscissa shows speed, measured as the distance between the tip of an actin tail in successive video frames divided by 5 s (the interval between frames). Mean speed was 0.24 plusminus 0.10 µm s-1 (plusminuss.d.). Actin tails persist for some time after they have stopped moving; the speed of such 'spent' actin tails (0−0.05 µm s-1) was not included in the histogram or the mean, as it would result in a large bar at the origin. We made 699 measurements of 126 actin tails in 9 cells; results were recorded as in a. c, Average fluorescence in a region of interest (ROI, see inset) measured in successive frames and plotted against time. Curves from 25 tails in 3 cells were normalized, with 100% representing peak fluorescence and 0% the local background, and then averaged; bars give s.e.m. In a−c the external solution was mildly hyperosmolar and in b, c it also contained 10 nM PMA to enhance the frequency of pinocytic events 18.



Full FigureFull Figure and legend (97K)
The results shown in Fig. 1a were recorded by evanescent field fluorescence microscopy (EFM) 8, a technique that selectively images the bottom of cells where they adhere to a glass coverslip. Some actin tails seemed to originate in the middle of the cell in such recordings; such tails were also seen when the bottom of chemically fixed cells was viewed by laser-scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM). However, three-dimensional images of such tails reconstructed from serial confocal sections showed them to extend to the plasma membrane above (data not shown). In four cells analysed in this way, the appearance of all tails was consistent with the tails having begun at the plasma membrane.

To characterize the motion of actin tails, we recorded video clips by EFM and plotted the speed of actin tails as a histogram (Fig. 1b ). The speed at the peak of the histogram (0.2 µm s-1 ; mean 0.24 µm s-1) was comparable to results obtained with Listeria 9 (0.23 µm s-1) and Shigella 4 (0.1 µm s-1). We also measured the fluorescence at a fixed point on an actin tail and watched it dim as the tail moved on and the actin depolymerized. Tails dimmed with half-lives of 20 s (Fig. 1c), values that are again comparable with those obtained for Listeria 3 (33 s) and Shigella 10 (38 s). Actin tails thus appear to exhibit the same speed and persistence regardless of whether they propel pinosomes or bacteria. However, whereas Listeria tails are active for up to 30 min 11, pinosome tails stopped and faded after only 1−2 min under our experimental conditions (Fig. 1a). Under more physiological conditions, tails may be shorter and even less persistent, making them harder to see and causing endosomes to move more slowly 2 or for less time. The limited lifetime of actin tails indicates that actin polymerization may be regulated during pinocytosis.

To identify the cargo carried by actin tails, we added rhodamine-labelled dextran to the external medium and studied live cells in equatorial sections by LSCM. Cells contained red, dextran-containing pinosomes (42.0 plusminus 2.9 per section and cell), of which 20.4 plusminus 6.2% were associated with a green tail (consisting of GFP−actin) during 250 s of observation (Fig. 2a). At least 90% of the tails (62 of 69 in 7 cells) had red pinosomes at their tips. The actual percentage of tails carrying pinosomes is probably higher, as very small vesicles must be well in focus to be seen and it is possible that the tips of some actin tails were never in focus during the observation time. Fig. 2b shows the plasma membrane invaginating to engulf fluid in a pinosome. An actin tail was initiated between the plasma membrane and the pinosome, and moved inward and out of the focal plane. The pinosome beneath the plasma membrane vanished, presumably carried away by the actin tail. Actin tails thus appear to begin at plasma-membrane sites of pinosome formation. For one cell, speeds of pinosomes were measured over 250 s and plotted as a histogram (Fig. 2c). Pinosomes moved rapidly only when associated with an actin tail.

Figure 2. Actin tails propel pinosomes.
Figure 2 thumbnail

a, A GFP−actin-expressing cell in external medium containing 4 mg ml-1 Texas-Red-conjugated dextran (Molecular Probes). Dextran generated a uniform red background and filled pinosomes so they became visible as red spots. Two (arrows) were associated with an actin tail. b, Magnified images of the same cell as shown in a, taken at the indicated intervals. Arrow, site of a plasma-membrane invagination. Red, Texas-Red-labelled dextran; green, GFP−actin. c, Speed of pinosomes in association with actin (right) or unassociated with actin (left). Ten of the forty-five pinosomes in this cell were temporarily associated with actin, most often with an actin tail. As actin tails do not vanish immediately after pinosomes have stopped moving, even actin-associated pinosomes experience periods of immobility. d, Angle of actin tails initiated at the plasma membrane. Fluorescent phalloidin marks an F-actin tail (green); fluorescent IgE (red) is taken up at the plasma membrane in a pinosome (arrow) in a fixed cell. e, Histogram showing the angles of actin tails with the plasma membrane. Abscissa, angles with the plasma membrane (dashed lines in d); these angles are positive when actin tails point their pinosomes into the cytosol and negative when they point towards the plasma membrane. LSCM was used throughout. External medium contained PMA and was isosmolar in a, b and mildly hyperosmolar in c−e. f−h, A model of how pinosomes gain polarity and direction. f, Ruffles carry actin-polymerization sites (black) at their crests. Polymerizing actin moves the tips in the direction shown by arrows; lines illustrate the direction of polymerization. g, The ruffle deposits the actin-polymerizing machinery at the point at which the pinocytic cup pinches off. h, Continued actin polymerization at this site forms a tail that propels the pinosome into the cytosol.



Full FigureFull Figure and legend (34K)
To determine whether actin tails were an artefact of transfection or GFP expression, we studied fixed, untransfected cells. Pinosomes were labelled by letting cells take up fluorescent immunoglobulin E bound to Fcalt epsilonRI receptors on the plasma membrane, and F-actin was labelled with fluorescent phalloidin. Phalloidin easily stained actin tails. Cells were viewed by LSCM in equatorial sections that were focused as much as possible on the tips of tails (Fig. 2d). Of 84 actin tails in 50 cells, 78 clearly carried pinosomes and only 2 clearly did not. Thus actin tails also occur in untransfected cells, and most or all carry pinosomes at their tips.

To determine whether pinosomes depart from the plasma membrane in a preferred direction, we studied actin tails that touched the plasma membrane (29 of 84). We measured the angles of these tails in relation to the plasma membrane (Fig. 2d) and plotted them as a histogram ( Fig. 2e). Most tails (26 of 29) pointed towards the cytosol, and 23 of these were within 45° of being perpendicular to the membrane. Thus, actin tails do not form at random angles with the plasma membrane (P<0.001, Komolgoroff−Smirnov test).

We have shown that pinosomes ignite transient bursts of actin polymerization after they pinch off from the plasma membrane, and that they then move into the cytosol at the tip of the resulting actin 'comet tails'. Comet tails have previously been seen in association with 'rocketing endosomes' in intact, uninfected, La3+- and Ni2+-treated cells 12 and, most recently, with Golgi-derived clathrin-coated vesicles in intact, uninfected HeLa cells 13. We have shown now that actin tails in RBL cells are associated specifically with moving pinosomes. These tails are similar or identical to those that propel Listeria and Shigella, in both their speed and their persistence. In Listeria, movement is thought to result from propulsive actin polymerization 3 and the same may apply to pinocyte movement.

Our results show that the machinery for propulsive actin polymerization is concentrated in ruffles. Ruffles must carry this machinery (which may include the complex Arp2/3 (ref. 14) because pinosomes do, and they are formed from ruffles 2. Most pinosomes have a region in which this machinery is more active than elsewhere, because uniform actin polymerization over the entire pinosome surface would prohibit movement. (Indeed, rare pinosomes that show GFP−actin fluorescence around their entire circumference do not move; data not shown.) This more active region must usually be the 'navel' (the point at which the pinosome pinched off from the plasma membrane), because most pinosomes move nearly vertically into the cytosol. The consistent localization of actin polymerization on the pinosome can be explained most simply if the machinery for actin polymerization is most active at the crests of ruffles (Fig. 2f−h). Its presence there strengthens the idea that ruffles extend by a mechanism involving actin polymerization.

After budding from the plasma membrane, pinosomes and endocytic vesicles must generally move into the cytosol for processing. Actin is widely thought to participate in endocytosis 7, 15, 16, 17. We propose that one of actin's functions in both endocytosis and pinocytosis may be to help endocytic vesicles and pinosomes move into the cytosol, by means of a brief burst of actin polymerization.

Methods
Cells.
Human beta-actin was fused to the carboxy terminus of EGFP (Clontech) and expressed under control of the long beta-actin promoter as described 6. RBL cells were grown to confluence at 37 °C and in 5% CO2 in RPMI medium (Sigma). For transfection, they were collected from 90-mm dishes by scraping, washed three times in HBS (150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 0.8 mM MgCl2, 20 mM HEPES, 1 mM glucose, pH 7.4), suspended in 0.4 ml HBS and electroporated with 30 µg vector. Cells were then plated onto flamed glass coverslips and used 24−48 h later. For imaging, glass coverslips with adherent cells were transferred to the experimental chamber containing HBS supplemented with either 10 nM PMA or 150 mM sucrose or both, as indicated. They were imaged 15−30 min later and kept at 37 °C throughout.

Imaging.
Cells were observed with an epi-illumination evanescent-field microscope that selectively illuminated a thin layer of cytosol where cells adhered to the glass coverslip 8. Even in thick cells the method avoids exciting significant out-of-focus fluorescence, so that all fluorescent light returning through the objective can be used for imaging and none is lost at the pinhole of a confocal microscope. Up to 200 images were taken with a back-illuminated cooled charge-coupled-device camera (Princeton Instruments) at 0.2 Hz from single cells without significant bleaching or photodamage. Movements observed are projections of three-dimensional trajectories into the plane of the coverslip. For simultaneous viewing of two fluorophores in living cells, we used a Leica TCS-NT confocal microscope (times100, 1.3 NA oil objective). Closed experimental chambers were made of a microscope slide, a piece of parafilm and a coverslip with adherent cells, and sealed with silicone grease. Up to 50 images were taken at 0.2 Hz with the confocal pinhole opened to increase light collection. Throughout, the microscope or microscope stage, specimen and objective were placed in an enclosure and maintained at 37 °C. Images were analysed with MetaMorph (Universal Imaging); the resulting numerical data were analysed in Origin (MicroCal).

Immunofluorescence.
For immunofluorescence, untransfected RBL cells were washed at room temperature to remove medium and then incubated for 30 min (4 °C) in hyperosmolar HBS with 10 nM PMA and 2 µg ml -1 anti-DNP-IgE (Sigma) conjugated to Alexa-568 (Molecular Probes). Alexa-568−IgE binds to the Fcalt epsilonRI receptor and is internalized in pinosomes. Cells were washed thrice in HBS (4 °C), placed in stimulation buffer (15 min at 37 °C), then fixed in PBS (Sigma) plus 3.7% paraformaldehyde (15 min), permeabilized with PBS + 0.1% Triton-X100 (2 min) and stained for F-actin in PBS + 20 U ml-1 Oregon-green−phalloidin (Molecular Probes) for 60 min (all at 20 °C). Cells were then viewed by LSCM with the pinhole stopped down to maximize resolution. Serial confocal sections of phalloidin-stained cells were deconvoluted using the Huygens-2 software package (Scientific Volume Imaging, Hilversum, Netherlands); the point spread function was determined by optical serial-sectioning of a fluorescent bead. Vertical sections were calculated using the program Imaris (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland).

 Top
Received 25 February 1999; Accepted 6 April 1999

REFERENCES
  1. Theriot, J. A. & Mitchison, T. J. Nature 352, 126−131 (1991). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  2. Swanson, J. A. & Watts, C. Trends Cell Biol. 5, 424−428 (1995). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Theriot, J. A., Mitchison, T. J., Tilney, L. G. & Portnoy, D. A. Nature 357, 257−260 (1992). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  4. Zeile, W. L., Purich, D. L. & Southwick, F. S. J. Cell Biol. 133, 49−59 (1996). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Cudmore, S., Cossart, P., Griffiths, G. & Way, M. Nature 378, 636−638 (1995). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Ballestrem, C., Wehrle-Haller, B. & Imhof, B. A. J. Cell Sci. 111, 1649−1658 (1998). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  7. Parton, R. G., Joggerst, B. & Simons, K. J. Cell Biol. 127, 1199−1215 (1994). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  8. Steyer, J. A. & Almers, W. Biophys. J. 76, 2262−2271 (1999). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Smith, G. A., Theriot, J. A. & Portnoy, D. A. J. Cell Biol. 135, 647−660 (1996). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Goldberg, M. B. & Theriot, J. A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6572−6576 (1995). | PubMed  | ChemPort |
  11. Nanavati, D., Ashton, F. T., Sanger, J. M. & Sanger, J. W. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 28, 346−358 (1994). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. Heuser, J. E. & Morisaki, J. H. Mol. Biol. Cell Abstr. 3, 172 (1992).
  13. Frischkecht, F. et al. Curr. Biol. 9, 89−92 (1999). | Article | PubMed  |
  14. Welch, M. D., DePace, A. H., Verma, S., Iwamatsu, A. & Mitchison, T. J. J. Cell Biol. 138, 375−384 (1997). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  15. Kubler, E. & Riezman, H. EMBO J. 12, 2855−2862 (1993). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  16. Gottlieb, T. A., Ivanov, I. E., Adesnik, M. & Sabatini, D. D. J. Cell Biol. 120, 695−710 (1993). | Article | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
  17. Lamaze, C., Fujimoto, L.M., Yin, H. L. & Schmid, S. L. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20333−20335 (1997). | Article |
  18. Swanson, J. A. J. Cell Sci. 94, 135−142 (1989). | PubMed  | ISI | ChemPort |
 Top
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Schweizerische Krebsliga and the Swiss National Science Foundation, by a European Commission grant and by the Max Planck Society. C.J.M. was the recipient of an EMBO short-term fellowship. We thank T. Soldati and T. Lang for comments on the manuscript.

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to W. A.



Supplementary information is available on Nature Cell Biology's World-Wide Web site (http://www.nature.com/ncb/webfocus/index.html).

FULL TEXT
Previous
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

naturejobs

Methods
Figures & Tables
Acknowledgements
References
Supplementary info
Export citation
Export references
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Cell Biology
ISSN: 1465-7392
EISSN: 1476-4679
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | For authors | Online submission | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | Reprints and permissions | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©1999 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy