Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements and Focuses
Image gallery
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
Content types
Primary research formats
Other formats

The guide for authors and the editorial policies, including the guide for referees, are available in PDF format.

PRIMARY RESEARCH FORMATS
An Article is a substantial novel research study, with a complex dataset often involving several techniques or approaches. The main text (including abstract, but excluding Methods, references and figure legends) is up to 3,500 words. The abstract is typically 150 words, unreferenced. Articles have up to 8 display items (figures and/or tables). An introduction (without heading) is followed by sections headed Results, Discussion and Methods. The Results and Methods should be divided by topical subheadings. Methods should be restricted to 1,200 words. If statistical testing was used to analyze the data, the Methods section must contain a subsection on statistical analysis. References are limited to 50.

Articles include received/accepted dates. They may be accompanied by supplementary information, comprising four items of text, figures or movies. Articles are peer reviewed, and authors must provide a competing financial interests statement before publication.

A Letter reports an important novel research result, but is less substantial than an Article. This format begins with an introductory paragraph (not abstract) of approximately 180 words, summarizing the background, rationale, main results and implications. This paragraph should be referenced, as in Nature style, and should be considered part of main text, so that any subsequent introductory material avoids too much redundancy with the introductory paragraph. The text is limited to 2,500 words, including the introductory paragraph, but excluding Methods, references and figure legends. References are limited to 30. Letters should have no more than 5 display items (figures and/or tables). Letters are not divided by headings, except for the Methods heading. If statistical testing was used to analyze the data, the Methods section must contain a subsection on statistical analysis.

Letters include received/accepted dates. They may be accompanied by supplementary information, usually comprising up to four items of text, figures or movies. Letters are peer reviewed, and authors must provide a competing financial interests statement before publication.

A Brief Communication reports a concise study of high quality and broad interest. Brief Communications begin with a brief unreferenced abstract (no more than 100 words), which will appear on Medline. The main text is typically 1,000-1,500 words, including abstract, but excluding references and figure legends, and contains no headings. Brief Communications normally have no more than 2 display items, although this may be flexible at the discretion of the editor. References are limited to 15. Article titles are omitted from the reference list.

Brief Communications include received/accepted dates. They may be accompanied by supplementary information. Brief Communications are peer reviewed, and authors must provide a competing financial interests statement before publication.

Top

OTHER FORMATS
Correspondence (formerly 'Letters to the Editor') is a flexible format that may include anything of interest to the journal's readers, from policy debates to announcements to 'refutations' from research papers. A Correspondence may describe primary research data, but only in summary form; this format is not intended for full presentation of data. Correspondence should never be more than one printed page, and usually much less. The number of references should not exceed 10 for either the Correspondence or its Reply, and article titles are omitted from the reference list. Titles for correspondence are supplied by the editors.

Authors must submit a competing financial interests statement, which is printed only if they declare that they have competing interests. In cases where a correspondence is critical of a previous research paper, the authors are normally given the option of publishing a brief reply. Criticism of opinions or other secondary matter does not involve an automatic right of reply.

Refutations are always peer reviewed. Other types of Correspondence may be peer reviewed at the editors' discretion.

News and Views are by prior arrangement only. They may be linked to articles in Nature Cell Biology, or they may focus on papers of exceptional significance that are published elsewhere. Unsolicited contributions will not normally be considered, although prospective authors are welcome to make proposals. News and Views are not peer reviewed. Authors must provide a competing financial interests statement before publication.

Book Reviews are by prior arrangement only, although suggestions are welcome. Book reviews are not peer reviewed. Authors must provide a competing financial interests statement before publication.

A Review is an authoritative, balanced and scholarly survey of recent developments in a research field. The requirement for balance need not prevent authors from proposing a specific viewpoint, but if there are controversies in the field, the authors must treat them in an even-handed way. Reviews are normally 3,000-4,000 words, and illustrations are strongly encouraged. References are limited to 100, with exceptions possible in special cases. Citations should be selective and, in the case of particularly important studies (≤ 10% of all the references), we encourage authors to provide short annotations explaining why these are key contributions. The scope of a Review should be broad enough that it is not dominated by the work of a single laboratory, and particularly not by the authors' own work.

Review authors must provide a competing financial interests statement before publication. Received/accepted dates are not included. Reviews are always peer reviewed to ensure factual accuracy, appropriate citations and scholarly balance.

Commentary is a very flexible format; Commentaries may be on policy, science and society or purely scientific issues. The main criteria are that they should be of immediate interest to a broad readership and should be written in an accessible, non-technical style. Their length is typically 1-4 pages, although some may be longer. Because the content is variable, the format is also flexible. Commentaries do not normally contain primary research data, although they may present 'sociological' data (funding trends, demographics, bibliographic data, etc.). References are limited to 25, and article titles are omitted from the reference list.

The related format Historical Commentary is a journalistic treatment of the history of a particular discovery or technical development. These pieces may be a personal account by one of the participants or may present strong personal opinions. This format does not necessarily seek scholarly balance, and it should be journalistic and accessible rather than scholarly in style.

Commentary authors must provide a competing financial interests statement before publication. Commentaries may be peer reviewed at the editors' discretion.

Perspective is a new format for scholarly reviews and discussions of the primary research literature that are too technical for a Commentary but do not meet the criteria for a Review—either because the scope is too narrow, or because the author is advocating a controversial position or a speculative hypothesis or discussing work primarily from one group. Two reviews advocating opposite sides in a research controversy are normally published as Perspectives. The text should not normally exceed 3000 words. References are limited to 50.

The related format Historical Perspective is a more technical account of a particular scientific development. Like other Perspectives, and in contrast to Historical Commentary, Historical Perspectives are scholarly reviews, including citation of key references, aiming to present a balanced account of the historical events, not merely personal opinions or reminiscences.

Perspective authors must provide a competing financial interests statement before publication. Received/accepted dates are not included. Perspectives are always peer reviewed.

The guide for authors and the editorial policies, including the guide for referees, are available in PDF format.

Top
Register-TOCSign up for table of contents e-alerts
RecommendRecommend to your library
ReceiveReceive news feeds
what is a news feed?

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Cell Biology
ISSN: 1465-7392
EISSN: 1476-4679
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | For authors | Online submission | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | Reprints and permissions | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works ©1999 - 2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy