Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Conferences
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
Press releases

Please quote Nature Biotechnology as the source of these items.

The July 2001 issue of Nature Biotechnology is available online.

 July 2001 Previous | Next

Molecular ID codes

Nature Biotechnology pp 631 - 635 and pp 621 - 622

Existing ways of labeling and visualizing DNA and protein molecules rely on a limited palette of radioactive elements, chemical dyes, or natural fluorescent protein molecules, such as green fluorescent protein. Biological research urgently needs a wider array of reliable, robust, and safe labeling molecules to facilitate studies for determining the types of molecules present in a cell, their cellular location, activity, and concentration. Now, a team of scientists led by Shuming Nie of Indiana University has invented a way to bar code DNA using tiny light-emitting crystals known as quantum dots. By embedding these quantum dots in microbeads bearing short strands of DNA, the researchers have created labels that can recognize particular DNA molecules of interest and tag them with a unique identification code.

Alternative labeling techniques, which often rely on radioactivity or organic dyes, have several drawbacks: Radioactive markers can have short half-lives and are toxic, while organic dyes come in a limited number of colors and may lose their glow too quickly. Quantum-dot microbeads are superior to these approaches in several ways. For instance, compared with organic dyes, quantum dots are brighter, more stable, and give sharper signals. Moreover, the color of a quantum dot can easily be changed by changing its size, yet differently colored dots can all be excited by a single wavelength of light—an approach not possible with other labeling systems.

The researchers predict that several tens of thousands of uniquely coded beads could be built using different combinations of colors and intensity levels. These molecular ID codes could then be used to simultaneously analyze a large number of molecules. Ultimately, the codes should be easily be tagged onto both nucleic acids and proteins—facilitating research in many areas of biomedical research, including drug screening, gene expression studies, and clinical diagnostics.


Quantum-dot-tagged microbeads for multiplexed optical coding of biomolecules pp 631 - 635
Mingyong Han, Xiaohu Gao, Jack Z. Su & Shuming Nie
doi:10.1038/90228
Abstract | Full text | PDF


Bar-coding biomolecules with fluorescent nanocrystals pp 621 - 622
Sandra J. Rosenthal
doi:10.1038/90213
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Top

Nanopores for DNA Diagnostics?

Nature Biotechnology pp 636 - 639 and pp 622 - 623

Sequencing DNA without gels seems pretty far-fetched. But Stefan Howorka and colleagues have shown that this may be possible. They have exploited the electrical conductivity properties of a nanopore—membrane-embedded proteins that form a channel—to detect single nucleotide changes in a sequence of DNA.

As a molecule moves through a nanopore, there are characteristic electrical conductivity changes that can be measured. Such conductivity profiles correspond with the size (and other characteristics) of the molecule moving through the pore.

The authors engineered a nanopore, tethering a short sequence of DNA at the entrance of the pore. Then they distinguished the DNA molecules drawn into the pore by examining the changes in current flow through the pore: Those DNA sequences that complemented the tethered DNA likely formed a duplex with the tethered molecule before passing through the membrane, producing a current reduction that was of longer duration than that generated by sequences containing mismatches. The researchers also determined the partial sequence of a DNA strand tethered to a nanopore by applying a series of DNA molecules of known sequence to the pore.

However, before nanopores can be used for routine DNA analysis and sequencing, further work needs to be done to engineer more robust and reproducible nanopores and, for sequencing, their fabrication into arrays.


Sequence-specific detection of individual DNA strands using engineered nanopores pp 636 - 639
Stefan Howorka, Stephen Cheley & Hagan Bayley
doi:10.1038/90236
Abstract | Full text | PDF


Nanopores with a spark for single-molecule detection pp 622 - 623
Hui Wang & Daniel Branton
doi:10.1038/90216
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Top

Combating corn rootworm

Nature Biotechnology pp 668 - 672 and pp 624 - 625

Corn rootworms (Diabrotica spp) are a persistent pest causing around $1 billion in damage to corn crops each year in the United States alone. To combat this problem, researchers have developed a genetically modified corn plant that gives the munching marauders a dose of deadly proteins.

Currently, corn rootworm infestations are treated either with insecticides or through crop rotation (when a crop other than corn is planted while the soil is still infected with rootworm eggs). Neither solution is ideal: rootworms have become resistant to insecticides; and delayed egg "hatching" enables the larvae to emerge just in time for the next planting of corn. So, building on work done on other transgenic crops, Dan Moellenbeck and colleagues expressed two novel native proteins—so-called endotoxins—from a common soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), whose toxins have been used previously in GM corn. Field trials of the new Bt endotoxin-expressing corn suggest that the plants suffer much less damage from the rootworm larvae than wild-type corn. The modified plants provided equivalent protection to wildtype plants treated with insecticide.

Although Bt technology has been applied before—for example, to protect plants against corn borer and Colorado potato beetle—this novel application could provide a new weapon against a serious corn pest and help reduce the use of insecticides. As with other types of Bt (or GM) corn, however, research is urgently needed to understand how to avoid the emergence of resistance to the toxin in the target pest, how to prevent cross contamination of conventional crops and wild relatives with the transgene, the safety of the Bt corn for use as a foodstuff, and its resistance to all members of the rootworm family that cause crop infestations.


Insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis protect corn from corn rootworms pp 668 - 672
Daniel J. Moellenbeck, Melvin L. Peters, James W. Bing, James R. Rouse, Laura S. Higgins, Lynne Sims, Tony Nevshemal, Lisa Marshall, R. Tracy Ellis, Paul G. Bystrak, Bruce A. Lang, James L. Stewart, Kristen Kouba, Valerie Sondag, Vicki Gustafson, Katy Nour, Deping Xu, Jan Swenson, Jian Zhang, Thomas Czapla, George Schwab, Susan Jayne, Brian A. Stockhoff, Kenneth Narva, H. Ernest Schnepf, Steven J. Stelman, Candace Poutre, Michael Koziel & Nicholas Duck
doi:10.1038/90282
Abstract | Full text | PDF


Crafting crop resistance to corn rootworms pp 624 - 625
Ken Ostlie
doi:10.1038/90219
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Top
Register-TOCRegister for table of contents e-alerts
RecommendRecommend to your library
ReceiveReceive news feeds
what is a news feed?
Nature Biotechnology in the news
Impact factor

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Biotechnology
ISSN: 1087-0156
EISSN: 1546-1696
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | Conferences | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works ©1998 - 2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy