Access
To read this article in full you may need to log in, make a payment or gain access through a site license (see right).
Opinion and Comment
Nature Biotechnology 26, 29 (1 January 2008) | doi:10.1038/nbt0108-29a
Response to Where did the scientific method go?
Abstract
Noseda and McLean raise interesting points. With regard to the ability to reproduce a paper's methodology and findings, the fact that descriptions of methods in Supplementary Material online are not copy edited for grammar or clarity at Nature Biotechnology (or at any other Nature research journal for that matter) could be argued to potentially compromise the lucidness and ease with which a reader can repeat a published experiment.
To read this article in full you may need to log in, make a payment or gain access through a site license (see right).
