Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Conferences
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Bioentrepreneur
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature
Nature Medicine
Nature Genetics
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Methods
Nature Chemical Biology
news@nature.com
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Feature
Nature Biotechnology 24, 31 - 39 (2006)
doi:10.1038/nbt0106-31

The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey

Lori Pressman1, Richard Burgess2, Robert M Cook-Deegan3, Stephen J McCormack4, Io Nami-Wolk5, Melissa Soucy5 & LeRoy Walters6

1  Lori Pressman is a Consultant to the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, 4 Crawford St., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

2  Richard Burgess is at IP Data Corporation, 2003 Old Mission Road, New Smyrna Beach, Florida 32162, USA

3  Robert M. Cook-Deegan is at the Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Box 90141, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0141, USA

4  Stephen J. McCormack is at NeuroSystec Corporation, Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Biomedical Engineering, 25134 Rye Canyon Loop, Valencia, California 91355, USA

5  Io Nami-Wolk and Melissa Soucy are at the Joseph and Rose Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057-1212, USA

6  LeRoy Walters is at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics and Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057-1212, USA.

Correspondence should be addressed to LeRoy Walters waltersl@georgetown.edu

A survey of technology transfer of DNA inventions at 19 top US research universities reveals consensus, diversity and flexibility in intellectual property management. Patent filing and license terms are influenced by intended uses of inventions, outside market interest and NIH guidelines.

 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
CrossRef lists 10 articles citing this articleCrossRef lists 10 articles citing this article
Save this linkSave this link

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

Figures & Tables
Supplementary info
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
Nature Biotechnology
ISSN: 1087-0156
EISSN: 1546-1696
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | Conferences | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy