Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Conferences
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Bioentrepreneur
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature
Nature Medicine
Nature Genetics
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Methods
Nature Chemical Biology
news@nature.com
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Analysis
Nature Biotechnology  23, 561 - 566 (2005)
Published online: 5 May 2005; | doi:10.1038/nbt1096

Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks

Ryan Kelley1, 2 & Trey Ideker1, 2

1  Program in Bioinformatics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., San Diego, California 92093-0412, USA.

2  Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., San Diego, California 92093-0412, USA.

Correspondence should be addressed to Trey Ideker trey@bioeng.ucsd.edu
Genetic interaction analysis,in which two mutations have a combined effect not exhibited by either mutation alone, is a powerful and widespread tool for establishing functional linkages between genes. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ongoing screens have generated >4,800 such genetic interaction data. We demonstrate that by combining these data with information on protein-protein, prote in-DNA or metabolic networks, it is possible to uncover physical mechanisms behind many of the observed genetic effects. Using a probabilistic model, we found that 1,922 genetic interactions are significantly associated with either between- or within-pathway explanations encoded in the physical networks, covering approx40% of known genetic interactions. These models predict new functions for 343 proteins and suggest that between-pathway explanations are better than within-pathway explanations at interpreting genetic interactions identified in systematic screens. This study provides a road map for how genetic and physical interactions can be integrated to reveal pathway organization and function.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Astrophysics An explosion of sound

Nature Physics News and Views (01 Sep 2006)

 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

naturejobs

Figures & Tables
Supplementary info
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Biotechnology
ISSN: 1087-0156
EISSN: 1546-1696
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | Conferences | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2005 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy