Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Conferences
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Bioentrepreneur
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature
Nature Medicine
Nature Genetics
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Methods
Nature Chemical Biology
news@nature.com
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Editorial
Nature Biotechnology  21, 1 (2003)
doi:10.1038/nbt0103-1b

It's a gas

Despite the gloomy fact that last year was the worst in recent memory for the biotechnology industry, Nature Biotechnology is pleased to announce that innovation in some areas is as fresh and vigorous as it always was. At least, it is if you believe news released in December by the American Chemical Society.

Late last year, the society announced a special report to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. The report divulged exciting news about plans to create "green cows." No, no, not green-colored cows (the press release helpfully points out), but environmentally cleaner cows!

The big problem, it seems, is that all these cattle lowing in the mangers and fields have been chomping the cud and producing too much methane as a result of digestion and "belching" (thankfully no other bodily functions are mentioned in the release). Methane is bad, apparently, because it is "a major contributor to the greenhouse effect in the atmosphere (second only to carbon dioxide), which many scientists think contributes to global warming." Although the ACS supplied no figures to quantify methane emissions from cows, a quick search of the literature reveals an estimate from the US EPA that domestic livestock contributes 20% of the total methane in the atmosphere. At this stage, Nature Biotechnology remains uncertain as to the extent of the threat posed by bovine-derived gas to global meteorological systems.

Whatever the case, all is not lost (here's where biotechnology comes in). Researchers are apparently working around the clock to alter the digestive process in cattle, either by removing the microorganisms that produce methane from their stomachs or by creating microorganisms that can produce metabolic products other than methane. As the release puts it: "end result: green cows."

Here then, at least, is one application where agbiotech comes up smelling like daisies.

 Top
FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Biotechnology
ISSN: 1087-0156
EISSN: 1546-1696
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | Conferences | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2003 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy