Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Conferences
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Bioentrepreneur
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature
Nature Medicine
Nature Genetics
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Methods
Nature Chemical Biology
news@nature.com
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Review
Environmental
     Contents                 Editorial                   Commentary       
Reviews Careers Feedback


Nature Biotechnology  20, 567 - 574 (2002)
doi:10.1038/nbt0602-567


There is an Errata (August 2002) associated with this Review.

Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops

Philip J. Dale1, Belinda Clarke2 & Eliana M.G. Fontes3

1  John Innes Centre, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.

2  Norwich Research Park Science, PO Box 715, Norwich NR4 7SY, UK.

3  Embrapa-Cenargen, PqEB-Final Av. W3 Norte, Brasilia, DF70770-900, Brazil.

Correspondence should be addressed to Philip J. Dale phil.dale@bbsrc.ac.uk
In recent years, there has been increasing interest in how changes in agricultural practice associated with the introduction of particular genetically modified (GM) crops might indirectly impact the environment. There is also interest in any effects that might be associated with recombinant and novel combinations of DNA passing into the environment, and the possibility that they may be taken up by microorganisms or other live biological material. From the current state of knowledge, the impact of free DNA of transgenic origin is likely to be negligible compared with the large amount of total free DNA. We can find no compelling scientific arguments to demonstrate that GM crops are innately different from non-GM crops. The kinds of potential impacts of GM crops fall into classes familiar from the cultivation of non-GM crops (e.g., invasiveness, weediness, toxicity, or biodiversity). It is likely, however, that the novelty of some of the products of GM crop improvement will present new challenges and perhaps opportunities to manage particular crops in creative ways.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

REFERENCE
Conservation of Biodiversity
Nature Encyclopaedia of Life Sciences
 See all 6 matches for Reference

REVIEWS
Genetic modification: Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives
Nature Reviews Genetics Review (01 Oct 2003)
 See all 10 matches for Reviews

NEWS AND VIEWS
Bollworms, genes and ecologists
Nature News and Views (05 Aug 1999)
Crop genetics: Reducing transgene escape routes
Nature News and Views (16 Apr 1998)
 See all 6 matches for News And Views

RESEARCH
Farm-scale evaluation of GM crops explained
Nature Correspondence (24 Jun 1999)
 See all 21 matches for Research

 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

naturejobs

Figures & Tables
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Biotechnology
ISSN: 1087-0156
EISSN: 1546-1696
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | Conferences | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2002 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy