Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Conferences
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Bioentrepreneur
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature
Nature Medicine
Nature Genetics
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Methods
Nature Chemical Biology
news@nature.com
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Business and Regulatory News
Nature Biotechnology  19, 5 (2001)
doi:10.1038/83520

GMO roundup

John Hodgson
UK civil servants prove themselves as adept as ever at handling potentially sensitive genetic modification issues. In the run up to the trial of four people accused of vandalizing crops in Scotland, Mae-Wan Ho of the Institute of Science in Society (London) announced at a press conference organized by the Scottish Green Party that an enzyme toxic to human health was present in crops currently in UK field trials. The enzyme she had in mind was barnase, Bacillus amyloliquifaciens RNAse, used in some oil-seed rape crops as part of a "terminator" approach. There is some evidence that the enzyme can be toxic to isolated human cells. In an attempt to smooth over the rumpus that was threatening, a spokesperson from the UK's Department of Environment, Transport, and the Regions said that it was the barnase gene and not the enzyme that was present in the crops, adding reassuringly that whereas the gene was not harmful, the enzyme would be poisonous.

Responding to the US EPA's deliberations over Aventis' StarLink corn (see p.11), a spokesperson for the US Organic Consumers Association said, "The health of Americans should not be put at risk simply for the convenience of the biotech industry." Quite so, and neither should it for the sake of organic farming, a user of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal toxins for many decades.

"In the light of the increasing consumer awareness in Germany, we already decided this year to approve only animal fodder that does not contain genetically engineered ingredients." This come from Matthias C. Baumgarten, director of communications at McDonald's Deutschland (although not himself a Hamburger). Now weren't McDonalds the folks whose customers were so aware that the company had to put a notice on its coffee cups warning that their contents might be hot?

 Top
FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

naturejobs

Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Biotechnology
ISSN: 1087-0156
EISSN: 1546-1696
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | Conferences | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2001 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy