Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Conferences
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Bioentrepreneur
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature
Nature Medicine
Nature Genetics
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Methods
Nature Chemical Biology
news@nature.com
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Dateline
Bio/Technology  10, 617 (1992)
doi:10.1038/nbt0692-617

What Went Wrong With Centoxin

Stephen M. Edgington

REFERENCES
    1. Baumgartner, J.D, Heumann, D., Gerain, J. et al. 1990. J. Exp.Med. 171: 889–896. | Article | ChemPort |
    2. Teng, N., Kaplan, H., Hebert, J. et al. 1985. PNAS82: 1790–1794.
    3. Wenzel, R. 1992. NEJM. 326: 1151–1152. | PubMed | ChemPort |
    4. Ziegler, E. and Smith, C. 1992. NEJM. 326: 1165. | PubMed | ChemPort |
 Top
 Top
References
| Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link

natureevents

References
Export citation
Export references
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
Nature Biotechnology
ISSN: 1087-0156
EISSN: 1546-1696
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | Conferences | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©1992 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy