Report this comment

Nature 483, 531 - 533 (7391)
Published online: 2012-03-29; | doi:10.1038/483531a

Article: Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

  1. #40692
    Date:
    2012-03-28 06:47:30 PM
    Sander Heinsalu said:

    Publication bias is a problem in all fields of research. The results of a paper should actually receive zero weight in the evaluation of its quality, otherwise there is the motivation to cherry-pick the data that give the most impressive result. The measure of quality should be the way the results were obtained – size of sample, experimental procedure, endpoints used. Ideally the reviewers of a paper should not see its results at all, only the description of the experiment.

Your details

Reason for moderation

When you hit 'submit' a message will be delivered to the moderator of this site. You should receive an email about the outcome of your complaint within days. Thank you for helping us to maintain the quality of our site.

Only use this facility for serious complaints, not merely because you disagree with something.

Please confirm the words below

In order to reduce spamming, this process ensures you are a real person and not an automated program.


Extra navigation

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT