Vision is an astonishingly powerful tool by which we perceive and ultimately
influence our environment. But our eyes alone can easily be misled: a
tall tower is likely to appear narrower than a squat building of the same
width, for example. If we relied on the accuracy of simple perception
when exerting visual control of action, we might find it hard to grasp
a computer mouse let alone perform tasks as complex as driving a car.
That we do have a two-tier view of the world is confirmed by experiments
reported this week. Volunteers were challenged to grasp a rectangular
block. When they looked at the block, they could not ignore its length
when judging its width. But when they grasped that same block in their
hands, across its width, its length was irrelevant. This shows that passive
perception involves 'holistic' processing of all aspects of an object's
shape, but when vision is used to direct physical engagement with an object,
only the relevant information on size and shape is used.
Visual control of action but not perception
requires analytical processing of object shape TZVI GANEL & MELVYN A. GOODALE Nature426, 664667 (2003); doi:10.1038/nature02156
| First
Paragraph | Full
Text (HTML / PDF) |