The argument
that the field sports of hunting, shooting and fishing are good for the countryside
and good for biodiversity has often been heard in the past few years as the UK
parliament has flirted with bills to abolish hunting with hounds on the grounds
of cruelty. A survey of three fox hunting areas in the shires of central England
now provides some support for the idea that field sports bring biodiversity benefits.
Landowners who take part in hunting or game-bird shooting tend to maintain more
woodland and hedgerows than those who do not, despite the availability of subsidies
to pay for environmental management. Those opposed to hunting can also take a
cue from these results, and argue that when hunting is banned, subsidies for habitat
conservation might need to be increased to pay for the land management needed
to maintain biodiversity.
Field sports and conservation in the United Kingdom T. E. E. OLDFIELD, R. J. SMITH, S. R. HARROP & N. LEADER-WILLIAMS Nature423, 531533 (2003); doi:10.1038/nature01678 | First
Paragraph | Full
Text (HTML / PDF) |