Access

Letter

Nature advance online publication 30 September 2009 | doi:10.1038/nature08472; Received 7 August 2009; Accepted 3 September 2009; Published online 30 September 2009

Open Innovation Challenges

  • Methods to Analyze Consumer Emotions

    • Deadline: Jan 17 2010
    • Reward: $10,000 USD

    The Seeker is looking for methods to analyze consumer emotions. This Challenge requires only a writ...

  • Single-cell Analysis Platform

    • Deadline: Dec 02 2009
    • Reward: $5,000 USD

    This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...

naturejobs

Cheater-resistance is not futile

Anupama Khare1, Lorenzo A. Santorelli1,2, Joan E. Strassmann2, David C. Queller2, Adam Kuspa1,2,3 & Gad Shaulsky1,2

  1. Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
  2. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
  3. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030, USA

Correspondence to: Gad Shaulsky1,2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to G.S. (Email: gadi@bcm.edu).

Top

Cooperative social systems are susceptible to cheating by individuals that reap the benefits of cooperation without incurring the costs1. There are various theoretical mechanisms for the repression of cheating2 and many have been tested experimentally. One possibility that has not been tested rigorously is the evolution of mutations that confer resistance to cheating. Here we show that the presence of a cheater in a population of randomly mutated social amoebae can select for cheater-resistance. Furthermore, we show that this cheater-resistance can be a noble strategy because the resister strain does not necessarily exploit other strains. Thus, the evolution of resisters may be instrumental in preserving cooperative behaviour in the face of cheating.