Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature , | doi:10.1038/nature06816; Received 22 August 2007; Accepted 4 February 2008; Published online 26 March 2008
nature jobs
Experienced QC Manager, Temp to hire for Consumer Products Company in Allentown, Pa
- KSR
- Wyomissing, PA, USA
Temp Geotechs-Fresh Science Grads Welcome-North Houston
- KSR
- Houston, TX, USA
Retinotopic order in the absence of axon competition
Nathan J. Gosse1, Linda M. Nevin2 & Herwig Baier1,2
- Program in Developmental Biology, and,
- Program in Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, Department of Physiology, 1550 Fourth Street, San Francisco, California 94158-2324, USA
Correspondence to: Herwig Baier1,2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to H.B. (Email: herwig.baier@ucsf.edu).
Abstract
The retinotectal projection has long been studied experimentally and theoretically, as a model for the formation of topographic brain maps1, 2, 3. Neighbouring retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) project their axons to neighbouring positions in the optic tectum, thus re-establishing a continuous neural representation of visual space. Mapping along this axis requires chemorepellent signalling from tectal cells, expressing ephrin-A ligands, to retinal growth cones, expressing EphA receptors4. High concentrations of ephrin A, increasing from anterior to posterior, prevent temporal axons from invading the posterior tectum. However, the force that drives nasal axons to extend past the anterior tectum and terminate in posterior regions remains to be identified. We tested whether axonaxon interactions, such as competition, are required for posterior tectum innervation. By transplanting blastomeres from a wild-type (WT) zebrafish into a lakritz (lak) mutant, which lacks all RGCs5, we created chimaeras with eyes that contained single RGCs. These solitary RGCs often extended axons into the tectum, where they branched to form a terminal arbor. Here we show that the distal tips of these arbors were positioned at retinotopically appropriate positions, ruling out an essential role for competition in innervation of the ephrin-A-rich posterior tectum. However, solitary arbors were larger and more complex than under normal, crowded conditions, owing to a lack of pruning of proximal branches during refinement of the retinotectal projection. We conclude that dense innervation is not required for targeting of retinal axons within the zebrafish tectum but serves to restrict arbor size and shape.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
