Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS AND VIEWS

The search for eruption signals in volcanic noise

A volcano that erupted with few precursory signals offers a test bed for seeking out ways of forecasting disaster — and a reminder that analysis on a global scale is necessary for a comprehensive understanding of volcanoes.
  1. Emily K. Montgomery-Brown

    1. Emily K. Montgomery-Brown is at the US Geological Survey, Cascades Volcano Observatory, Vancouver, Washington 98683, USA.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

The beginnings of volcanic eruptions are often heralded by changes in observable features such as seismic activity, gas chemistry and the shape of the volcano. That wasn’t the case, however, on 22 May 2021, when Mount Nyiragongo in the Democratic Republic of the Congo erupted. As Smittarello et al.1 report in a paper in Nature, the volcano had been undergoing low-intensity eruptive activity since 2002 and had remained mostly unchanged from this condition until its striking and destructive eruption. The authors’ analysis provides clues to how such eruptions can be forecast in the absence of the usual precursors.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 609, 36-38 (2022)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-02347-x

References

  1. Smittarello, D. et al. Nature 609, 83–88 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrière, J. et al. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 528, 115821 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burgi, P.-Y., Boudoire, G., Rufino, F., Karume, K. & Tedesco, D. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088484 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrière, J. et al. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 127, e2021JB023858 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boudoire, G. et al. Sci. Rep. 12, 7488 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Montgomery-Brown, E. K. & Miklius, A. Geology 49, 397–401 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebinger, C. Astron. Geophys. 46, 2.16–2.21 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shreve, T. et al. Sci. Rep. 9, 18868 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carracedo, J. C. et al. Geol. Today 38, 94–107 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sigmundsson, F. et al. Nature 517, 191–195 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neal, C. A. et al. Science 363, 367–374 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Novellis, V. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 5817–5827 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peltier, A., Bachèlery, P. & Staudacher, T. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 184, 93–108 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links